Jak badać politykę?
How to study politics? Contemporary methodological discourse in political science on the example of the Flyvbjerg Debate The article is the analysis of contemporary methodological discourse in political science on the example of the Flyvbjerg Debate. The article focuses on Bent Flyvbjerg’s and Da...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN PL |
| Publicado: |
Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/549398f5459848109bf1aee6e9546b3c |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:549398f5459848109bf1aee6e9546b3c |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:549398f5459848109bf1aee6e9546b3c2021-11-27T13:15:53ZJak badać politykę?10.12797/Politeja.11.2014.32.031733-67162391-6737https://doaj.org/article/549398f5459848109bf1aee6e9546b3c2014-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/2412https://doaj.org/toc/1733-6716https://doaj.org/toc/2391-6737 How to study politics? Contemporary methodological discourse in political science on the example of the Flyvbjerg Debate The article is the analysis of contemporary methodological discourse in political science on the example of the Flyvbjerg Debate. The article focuses on Bent Flyvbjerg’s and David D. Laitin’s positions linking them with broader discussions in political science. Especially those concerning proper model of scientific researches. The author traces evolution of political science from the perspective of controversy between protagonists of analytical‑empirical model and their critics. Marek PająkKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishingarticlenauka o politycedyskurs metodologicznyFlyvbjerg DebateLawKPolitical scienceJENPLPoliteja, Vol 11, Iss 6 (32) (2014) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN PL |
| topic |
nauka o polityce dyskurs metodologiczny Flyvbjerg Debate Law K Political science J |
| spellingShingle |
nauka o polityce dyskurs metodologiczny Flyvbjerg Debate Law K Political science J Marek Pająk Jak badać politykę? |
| description |
How to study politics? Contemporary methodological discourse in political science on the example of the Flyvbjerg Debate
The article is the analysis of contemporary methodological discourse in political science on the example of the Flyvbjerg Debate. The article focuses on Bent Flyvbjerg’s and David D. Laitin’s positions linking them with broader discussions in political science. Especially those concerning proper model of scientific researches. The author traces evolution of political science from the perspective of controversy between protagonists of analytical‑empirical model and their critics.
|
| format |
article |
| author |
Marek Pająk |
| author_facet |
Marek Pająk |
| author_sort |
Marek Pająk |
| title |
Jak badać politykę? |
| title_short |
Jak badać politykę? |
| title_full |
Jak badać politykę? |
| title_fullStr |
Jak badać politykę? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Jak badać politykę? |
| title_sort |
jak badać politykę? |
| publisher |
Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/549398f5459848109bf1aee6e9546b3c |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT marekpajak jakbadacpolityke |
| _version_ |
1718408559130050560 |