Agent, action and agent’s awareness. A conceptual clari cation of our experience
In this paper I propose two genuine philosophical approaches to action and I compare the different positions about this topic. I attempt to show that Heidegger’s elaboration about the “worldlessness of world”, about “poverty in world of animal” and about the “world-formation of Dasein” can bring to...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN FR IT |
Publicado: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/54bd2f93550f4df6b52dc00786ba42a4 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:54bd2f93550f4df6b52dc00786ba42a4 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:54bd2f93550f4df6b52dc00786ba42a42021-12-02T10:38:59ZAgent, action and agent’s awareness. A conceptual clari cation of our experience10.13128/Phe_Mi-196462280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/54bd2f93550f4df6b52dc00786ba42a42016-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7054https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 In this paper I propose two genuine philosophical approaches to action and I compare the different positions about this topic. I attempt to show that Heidegger’s elaboration about the “worldlessness of world”, about “poverty in world of animal” and about the “world-formation of Dasein” can bring to mind Gallagher&Zahavi’s distinction about “oriented-towards-something movements”, “action”, and “action with sense of agency”. In this sense I try to reflect about act, action, agent and about the agent’s awareness to be an agent towards a phenomenology of action, towards a phenomenological clarification of our experience. In the first part I propose some philosophical elements about phenomenology of action showing how it is difficult to identify two or more experiences “as the same experiences”. In the second part I recall very briefly the main line of Gallagher&Zahavi perspective that we can find principally in “The Phenomenological Mind” where they try to explain the different aspects of movement and action proposing some reflections about agency. In the third part I expose Heidegger’s position that we can find in the “The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics”. In the fourth part, I present the synergetic attempt of comparison between Heidegger thought and Gallagher&Zahavi perspective. Luca CasartelliRosenberg & Sellierarticlephenomenology of actionagencyHeideggerGallagherAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 1 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN FR IT |
topic |
phenomenology of action agency Heidegger Gallagher Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 |
spellingShingle |
phenomenology of action agency Heidegger Gallagher Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 Luca Casartelli Agent, action and agent’s awareness. A conceptual clari cation of our experience |
description |
In this paper I propose two genuine philosophical approaches to action and I compare the different positions about this topic. I attempt to show that Heidegger’s elaboration about the “worldlessness of world”, about “poverty in world of animal” and about the “world-formation of Dasein” can bring to mind Gallagher&Zahavi’s distinction about “oriented-towards-something movements”, “action”, and “action with sense of agency”. In this sense I try to reflect about act, action, agent and about the agent’s awareness to be an agent towards a phenomenology of action, towards a phenomenological clarification of our experience. In the first part I propose some philosophical elements about phenomenology of action showing how it is difficult to identify two or more experiences “as the same experiences”. In the second part I recall very briefly the main line of Gallagher&Zahavi perspective that we can find principally in “The Phenomenological Mind” where they try to explain the different aspects of movement and action proposing some reflections about agency. In the third part I expose Heidegger’s position that we can find in the “The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics”. In the fourth part, I present the synergetic attempt of comparison between Heidegger thought and Gallagher&Zahavi perspective.
|
format |
article |
author |
Luca Casartelli |
author_facet |
Luca Casartelli |
author_sort |
Luca Casartelli |
title |
Agent, action and agent’s awareness. A conceptual clari cation of our experience |
title_short |
Agent, action and agent’s awareness. A conceptual clari cation of our experience |
title_full |
Agent, action and agent’s awareness. A conceptual clari cation of our experience |
title_fullStr |
Agent, action and agent’s awareness. A conceptual clari cation of our experience |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agent, action and agent’s awareness. A conceptual clari cation of our experience |
title_sort |
agent, action and agent’s awareness. a conceptual clari cation of our experience |
publisher |
Rosenberg & Sellier |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/54bd2f93550f4df6b52dc00786ba42a4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lucacasartelli agentactionandagentsawarenessaconceptualclaricationofourexperience |
_version_ |
1718396874341220352 |