Impact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections

Abstract Vascular graft or endograft Infections (VGEI) are rare but severe complications of vascular reconstructive surgery, and associated with significant mortality and morbidity risk. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (PET/CT) has been shown to have a hi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lars Husmann, Nadia Eberhard, Martin W. Huellner, Bruno Ledergerber, Anna Mueller, Hannes Gruenig, Michael Messerli, Carlos-A. Mestres, Zoran Rancic, Alexander Zimmermann, Barbara Hasse
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/54d2626d12af46cfaab163b1bc796f84
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:54d2626d12af46cfaab163b1bc796f84
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:54d2626d12af46cfaab163b1bc796f842021-12-02T14:34:03ZImpact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections10.1038/s41598-021-93331-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/54d2626d12af46cfaab163b1bc796f842021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93331-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Vascular graft or endograft Infections (VGEI) are rare but severe complications of vascular reconstructive surgery, and associated with significant mortality and morbidity risk. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (PET/CT) has been shown to have a high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of VGEI. In this single-center prospective cohort study, we assessed the rate and the impact on patient management of relevant unknown incidental findings in PET/CT of patients with proven or suspected VGEI, and clinical follow-up of all patients was performed. Our study results show a comparably high rate of relevant unknown incidental findings (181 in 502 examinations), with documented direct impact on patient management in 80 of 181 (44%) of all findings. PET/CT scan- and patient-based evaluation revealed impact on patient management in 76 of 502 (17%) of all PET/CT scans, and in 59 of 162 (36%) of all patients, respectively. Furthermore, PET/CT correctly identified the final diagnosis in 20 of 36 (56%) patients without VGEI. In conclusion, in proven and suspected VGEI, PET/CT detects a high rate of relevant unknown incidental findings with high impact on patient management.Lars HusmannNadia EberhardMartin W. HuellnerBruno LedergerberAnna MuellerHannes GruenigMichael MesserliCarlos-A. MestresZoran RancicAlexander ZimmermannBarbara HasseNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Lars Husmann
Nadia Eberhard
Martin W. Huellner
Bruno Ledergerber
Anna Mueller
Hannes Gruenig
Michael Messerli
Carlos-A. Mestres
Zoran Rancic
Alexander Zimmermann
Barbara Hasse
Impact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections
description Abstract Vascular graft or endograft Infections (VGEI) are rare but severe complications of vascular reconstructive surgery, and associated with significant mortality and morbidity risk. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (PET/CT) has been shown to have a high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of VGEI. In this single-center prospective cohort study, we assessed the rate and the impact on patient management of relevant unknown incidental findings in PET/CT of patients with proven or suspected VGEI, and clinical follow-up of all patients was performed. Our study results show a comparably high rate of relevant unknown incidental findings (181 in 502 examinations), with documented direct impact on patient management in 80 of 181 (44%) of all findings. PET/CT scan- and patient-based evaluation revealed impact on patient management in 76 of 502 (17%) of all PET/CT scans, and in 59 of 162 (36%) of all patients, respectively. Furthermore, PET/CT correctly identified the final diagnosis in 20 of 36 (56%) patients without VGEI. In conclusion, in proven and suspected VGEI, PET/CT detects a high rate of relevant unknown incidental findings with high impact on patient management.
format article
author Lars Husmann
Nadia Eberhard
Martin W. Huellner
Bruno Ledergerber
Anna Mueller
Hannes Gruenig
Michael Messerli
Carlos-A. Mestres
Zoran Rancic
Alexander Zimmermann
Barbara Hasse
author_facet Lars Husmann
Nadia Eberhard
Martin W. Huellner
Bruno Ledergerber
Anna Mueller
Hannes Gruenig
Michael Messerli
Carlos-A. Mestres
Zoran Rancic
Alexander Zimmermann
Barbara Hasse
author_sort Lars Husmann
title Impact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections
title_short Impact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections
title_full Impact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections
title_fullStr Impact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections
title_full_unstemmed Impact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections
title_sort impact of unknown incidental findings in pet/ct examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/54d2626d12af46cfaab163b1bc796f84
work_keys_str_mv AT larshusmann impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections
AT nadiaeberhard impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections
AT martinwhuellner impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections
AT brunoledergerber impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections
AT annamueller impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections
AT hannesgruenig impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections
AT michaelmesserli impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections
AT carlosamestres impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections
AT zoranrancic impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections
AT alexanderzimmermann impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections
AT barbarahasse impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections
_version_ 1718391128607162368