Impact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections
Abstract Vascular graft or endograft Infections (VGEI) are rare but severe complications of vascular reconstructive surgery, and associated with significant mortality and morbidity risk. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (PET/CT) has been shown to have a hi...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/54d2626d12af46cfaab163b1bc796f84 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:54d2626d12af46cfaab163b1bc796f84 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:54d2626d12af46cfaab163b1bc796f842021-12-02T14:34:03ZImpact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections10.1038/s41598-021-93331-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/54d2626d12af46cfaab163b1bc796f842021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93331-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Vascular graft or endograft Infections (VGEI) are rare but severe complications of vascular reconstructive surgery, and associated with significant mortality and morbidity risk. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (PET/CT) has been shown to have a high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of VGEI. In this single-center prospective cohort study, we assessed the rate and the impact on patient management of relevant unknown incidental findings in PET/CT of patients with proven or suspected VGEI, and clinical follow-up of all patients was performed. Our study results show a comparably high rate of relevant unknown incidental findings (181 in 502 examinations), with documented direct impact on patient management in 80 of 181 (44%) of all findings. PET/CT scan- and patient-based evaluation revealed impact on patient management in 76 of 502 (17%) of all PET/CT scans, and in 59 of 162 (36%) of all patients, respectively. Furthermore, PET/CT correctly identified the final diagnosis in 20 of 36 (56%) patients without VGEI. In conclusion, in proven and suspected VGEI, PET/CT detects a high rate of relevant unknown incidental findings with high impact on patient management.Lars HusmannNadia EberhardMartin W. HuellnerBruno LedergerberAnna MuellerHannes GruenigMichael MesserliCarlos-A. MestresZoran RancicAlexander ZimmermannBarbara HasseNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Lars Husmann Nadia Eberhard Martin W. Huellner Bruno Ledergerber Anna Mueller Hannes Gruenig Michael Messerli Carlos-A. Mestres Zoran Rancic Alexander Zimmermann Barbara Hasse Impact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections |
description |
Abstract Vascular graft or endograft Infections (VGEI) are rare but severe complications of vascular reconstructive surgery, and associated with significant mortality and morbidity risk. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (PET/CT) has been shown to have a high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of VGEI. In this single-center prospective cohort study, we assessed the rate and the impact on patient management of relevant unknown incidental findings in PET/CT of patients with proven or suspected VGEI, and clinical follow-up of all patients was performed. Our study results show a comparably high rate of relevant unknown incidental findings (181 in 502 examinations), with documented direct impact on patient management in 80 of 181 (44%) of all findings. PET/CT scan- and patient-based evaluation revealed impact on patient management in 76 of 502 (17%) of all PET/CT scans, and in 59 of 162 (36%) of all patients, respectively. Furthermore, PET/CT correctly identified the final diagnosis in 20 of 36 (56%) patients without VGEI. In conclusion, in proven and suspected VGEI, PET/CT detects a high rate of relevant unknown incidental findings with high impact on patient management. |
format |
article |
author |
Lars Husmann Nadia Eberhard Martin W. Huellner Bruno Ledergerber Anna Mueller Hannes Gruenig Michael Messerli Carlos-A. Mestres Zoran Rancic Alexander Zimmermann Barbara Hasse |
author_facet |
Lars Husmann Nadia Eberhard Martin W. Huellner Bruno Ledergerber Anna Mueller Hannes Gruenig Michael Messerli Carlos-A. Mestres Zoran Rancic Alexander Zimmermann Barbara Hasse |
author_sort |
Lars Husmann |
title |
Impact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections |
title_short |
Impact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections |
title_full |
Impact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections |
title_fullStr |
Impact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of unknown incidental findings in PET/CT examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections |
title_sort |
impact of unknown incidental findings in pet/ct examinations of patients with proven or suspected vascular graft or endograft infections |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/54d2626d12af46cfaab163b1bc796f84 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT larshusmann impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections AT nadiaeberhard impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections AT martinwhuellner impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections AT brunoledergerber impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections AT annamueller impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections AT hannesgruenig impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections AT michaelmesserli impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections AT carlosamestres impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections AT zoranrancic impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections AT alexanderzimmermann impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections AT barbarahasse impactofunknownincidentalfindingsinpetctexaminationsofpatientswithprovenorsuspectedvasculargraftorendograftinfections |
_version_ |
1718391128607162368 |