Evaluating the scientific credentials of the supporters of public petitions denying anthropogenic climate change

Notwithstanding the extensive media coverage of topics related to climate change, communication initiatives in open contradiction with the scientific understanding of climate change as a primarily anthropogenic phenomenon are still widespread. We focus here on a recent such initiative, which gained...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Stefano Caserini, Sylvie Coyaud, Giulia Persico, Gabriele Messori
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:	climate change communication climate change denial climate change miscommunication Oceanography GC1-1581 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/54f0c25711bf4ff9bbc86be9c881af66
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:54f0c25711bf4ff9bbc86be9c881af66
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:54f0c25711bf4ff9bbc86be9c881af662021-12-01T14:40:58ZEvaluating the scientific credentials of the supporters of public petitions denying anthropogenic climate change1600-087010.1080/16000870.2021.1875727https://doaj.org/article/54f0c25711bf4ff9bbc86be9c881af662021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2021.1875727https://doaj.org/toc/1600-0870Notwithstanding the extensive media coverage of topics related to climate change, communication initiatives in open contradiction with the scientific understanding of climate change as a primarily anthropogenic phenomenon are still widespread. We focus here on a recent such initiative, which gained notoriety between the second half of 2019 and the first half of 2020. We show that its promoters and signatories generally display an extremely low level of scientific activity within the field of climate change. We use this as a basis to reflect upon the scientific credentials of those behind climate change misinformation and the broader context of the communication of climate change.Stefano CaseriniSylvie CoyaudGiulia PersicoGabriele MessoriTaylor & Francis Grouparticleclimate change communicationclimate change denialclimate change miscommunicationOceanographyGC1-1581Meteorology. ClimatologyQC851-999ENTellus: Series A, Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, Vol 73, Iss 1, Pp 1-4 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	climate change communication climate change denial climate change miscommunication Oceanography GC1-1581 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999
spellingShingle	climate change communication climate change denial climate change miscommunication Oceanography GC1-1581 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 Stefano Caserini Sylvie Coyaud Giulia Persico Gabriele Messori Evaluating the scientific credentials of the supporters of public petitions denying anthropogenic climate change
description	Notwithstanding the extensive media coverage of topics related to climate change, communication initiatives in open contradiction with the scientific understanding of climate change as a primarily anthropogenic phenomenon are still widespread. We focus here on a recent such initiative, which gained notoriety between the second half of 2019 and the first half of 2020. We show that its promoters and signatories generally display an extremely low level of scientific activity within the field of climate change. We use this as a basis to reflect upon the scientific credentials of those behind climate change misinformation and the broader context of the communication of climate change.
format	article
author	Stefano Caserini Sylvie Coyaud Giulia Persico Gabriele Messori
author_facet	Stefano Caserini Sylvie Coyaud Giulia Persico Gabriele Messori
author_sort	Stefano Caserini
title	Evaluating the scientific credentials of the supporters of public petitions denying anthropogenic climate change
title_short	Evaluating the scientific credentials of the supporters of public petitions denying anthropogenic climate change
title_full	Evaluating the scientific credentials of the supporters of public petitions denying anthropogenic climate change
title_fullStr	Evaluating the scientific credentials of the supporters of public petitions denying anthropogenic climate change
title_full_unstemmed	Evaluating the scientific credentials of the supporters of public petitions denying anthropogenic climate change
title_sort	evaluating the scientific credentials of the supporters of public petitions denying anthropogenic climate change
publisher	Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/54f0c25711bf4ff9bbc86be9c881af66
work_keys_str_mv	AT stefanocaserini evaluatingthescientificcredentialsofthesupportersofpublicpetitionsdenyinganthropogenicclimatechange AT sylviecoyaud evaluatingthescientificcredentialsofthesupportersofpublicpetitionsdenyinganthropogenicclimatechange AT giuliapersico evaluatingthescientificcredentialsofthesupportersofpublicpetitionsdenyinganthropogenicclimatechange AT gabrielemessori evaluatingthescientificcredentialsofthesupportersofpublicpetitionsdenyinganthropogenicclimatechange
_version_	1718404991350210560

Evaluating the scientific credentials of the supporters of public petitions denying anthropogenic climate change

Ejemplares similares