A risk prediction model for screening bacteremic patients: a cross sectional study.

<h4>Background</h4>Bacteraemia is a frequent and severe condition with a high mortality rate. Despite profound knowledge about the pre-test probability of bacteraemia, blood culture analysis often results in low rates of pathogen detection and therefore increasing diagnostic costs. To im...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franz Ratzinger, Michel Dedeyan, Matthias Rammerstorfer, Thomas Perkmann, Heinz Burgmann, Athanasios Makristathis, Georg Dorffner, Felix Lötsch, Alexander Blacky, Michael Ramharter
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/55169854b6d34492af5130be821d3d3c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:55169854b6d34492af5130be821d3d3c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:55169854b6d34492af5130be821d3d3c2021-11-25T06:02:10ZA risk prediction model for screening bacteremic patients: a cross sectional study.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0106765https://doaj.org/article/55169854b6d34492af5130be821d3d3c2014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/25184209/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Bacteraemia is a frequent and severe condition with a high mortality rate. Despite profound knowledge about the pre-test probability of bacteraemia, blood culture analysis often results in low rates of pathogen detection and therefore increasing diagnostic costs. To improve the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling, we computed a risk prediction model based on highly standardizable variables, with the ultimate goal to identify via an automated decision support tool patients with very low risk for bacteraemia.<h4>Methods</h4>In this retrospective hospital-wide cohort study evaluating 15,985 patients with suspected bacteraemia, 51 variables were assessed for their diagnostic potency. A derivation cohort (n = 14.699) was used for feature and model selection as well as for cut-off specification. Models were established using the A2DE classifier, a supervised Bayesian classifier. Two internally validated models were further evaluated by a validation cohort (n = 1,286).<h4>Results</h4>The proportion of neutrophile leukocytes in differential blood count was the best individual variable to predict bacteraemia (ROC-AUC: 0.694). Applying the A2DE classifier, two models, model 1 (20 variables) and model 2 (10 variables) were established with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.767 and 0.759, respectively. In the validation cohort, ROC-AUCs of 0.800 and 0.786 were achieved. Using predefined cut-off points, 16% and 12% of patients were allocated to the low risk group with a negative predictive value of more than 98.8%.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Applying the proposed models, more than ten percent of patients with suspected blood stream infection were identified having minimal risk for bacteraemia. Based on these data the application of this model as an automated decision support tool for physicians is conceivable leading to a potential increase in the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling. External prospective validation of the model's generalizability is needed for further appreciation of the usefulness of this tool.Franz RatzingerMichel DedeyanMatthias RammerstorferThomas PerkmannHeinz BurgmannAthanasios MakristathisGeorg DorffnerFelix LötschAlexander BlackyMichael RamharterPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 9, p e106765 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Franz Ratzinger
Michel Dedeyan
Matthias Rammerstorfer
Thomas Perkmann
Heinz Burgmann
Athanasios Makristathis
Georg Dorffner
Felix Lötsch
Alexander Blacky
Michael Ramharter
A risk prediction model for screening bacteremic patients: a cross sectional study.
description <h4>Background</h4>Bacteraemia is a frequent and severe condition with a high mortality rate. Despite profound knowledge about the pre-test probability of bacteraemia, blood culture analysis often results in low rates of pathogen detection and therefore increasing diagnostic costs. To improve the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling, we computed a risk prediction model based on highly standardizable variables, with the ultimate goal to identify via an automated decision support tool patients with very low risk for bacteraemia.<h4>Methods</h4>In this retrospective hospital-wide cohort study evaluating 15,985 patients with suspected bacteraemia, 51 variables were assessed for their diagnostic potency. A derivation cohort (n = 14.699) was used for feature and model selection as well as for cut-off specification. Models were established using the A2DE classifier, a supervised Bayesian classifier. Two internally validated models were further evaluated by a validation cohort (n = 1,286).<h4>Results</h4>The proportion of neutrophile leukocytes in differential blood count was the best individual variable to predict bacteraemia (ROC-AUC: 0.694). Applying the A2DE classifier, two models, model 1 (20 variables) and model 2 (10 variables) were established with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.767 and 0.759, respectively. In the validation cohort, ROC-AUCs of 0.800 and 0.786 were achieved. Using predefined cut-off points, 16% and 12% of patients were allocated to the low risk group with a negative predictive value of more than 98.8%.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Applying the proposed models, more than ten percent of patients with suspected blood stream infection were identified having minimal risk for bacteraemia. Based on these data the application of this model as an automated decision support tool for physicians is conceivable leading to a potential increase in the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling. External prospective validation of the model's generalizability is needed for further appreciation of the usefulness of this tool.
format article
author Franz Ratzinger
Michel Dedeyan
Matthias Rammerstorfer
Thomas Perkmann
Heinz Burgmann
Athanasios Makristathis
Georg Dorffner
Felix Lötsch
Alexander Blacky
Michael Ramharter
author_facet Franz Ratzinger
Michel Dedeyan
Matthias Rammerstorfer
Thomas Perkmann
Heinz Burgmann
Athanasios Makristathis
Georg Dorffner
Felix Lötsch
Alexander Blacky
Michael Ramharter
author_sort Franz Ratzinger
title A risk prediction model for screening bacteremic patients: a cross sectional study.
title_short A risk prediction model for screening bacteremic patients: a cross sectional study.
title_full A risk prediction model for screening bacteremic patients: a cross sectional study.
title_fullStr A risk prediction model for screening bacteremic patients: a cross sectional study.
title_full_unstemmed A risk prediction model for screening bacteremic patients: a cross sectional study.
title_sort risk prediction model for screening bacteremic patients: a cross sectional study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/55169854b6d34492af5130be821d3d3c
work_keys_str_mv AT franzratzinger ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT micheldedeyan ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT matthiasrammerstorfer ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT thomasperkmann ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT heinzburgmann ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT athanasiosmakristathis ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT georgdorffner ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT felixlotsch ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT alexanderblacky ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT michaelramharter ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT franzratzinger riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT micheldedeyan riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT matthiasrammerstorfer riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT thomasperkmann riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT heinzburgmann riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT athanasiosmakristathis riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT georgdorffner riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT felixlotsch riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT alexanderblacky riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT michaelramharter riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1718414281377054720