Education Research Quantitative Analysis for Little Respondents
Many researchers are confused about which software to use because there is no research on software comparisons for quantitative research data analysis. The purpose of this study is to compare the results of quantitative research data processing in the field of education management using Lisrel, Tet...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN ID |
| Publicado: |
Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/552f1c8c848b4f37b17a69fc473d8036 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Many researchers are confused about which software to use because there is no research on software comparisons for quantitative research data analysis. The purpose of this study is to compare the results of quantitative research data processing in the field of education management using Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS software for small samples or respondents. This research method is quantitative and research data analysis uses the four types of software to obtain a comparison of the results of the analysis. The analysis in this study focuses on the analysis of hypothesis testing and regression analysis. Regression analysis is used to measure how much influence the independent variable has on the dependent variable. The field of this research is education management and the research data uses quantitative data derived from questionnaire data for a small sample of 40 respondents with three research variables, namely the independent variable of transformational leadership and job satisfaction, while the dependent variable is teacher performance. Based on the results of the analysis using Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS software, the results showed that for a small sample there was no significant difference in the significance value of p-value and t-value. There is also no significant difference in the determination value, and the correlation value in the resulting structural equation also has no significant difference in results, while for CB-SEM represented by Lisrel, Tetrad cannot process data with a Little respondents size. The novelty of this research is the result of comparative analysis of Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS
|
|---|