Education Research Quantitative Analysis for Little Respondents

Many researchers are confused about which software to use because there is no research on software comparisons for quantitative research data analysis. The purpose of this study is to compare the results of quantitative research data processing in the field of education management using Lisrel, Tet...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agus Purwanto, Masduki Asbari, Teguh Iman Santoso, Denok Sunarsi, Dodi Ilham
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
ID
Publicado: Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo 2021
Materias:
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/552f1c8c848b4f37b17a69fc473d8036
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:552f1c8c848b4f37b17a69fc473d8036
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:552f1c8c848b4f37b17a69fc473d80362021-12-02T06:33:59ZEducation Research Quantitative Analysis for Little Respondents10.30605/jsgp.4.2.2021.13262654-6477https://doaj.org/article/552f1c8c848b4f37b17a69fc473d80362021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://e-journal.my.id/jsgp/article/view/1326https://doaj.org/toc/2654-6477 Many researchers are confused about which software to use because there is no research on software comparisons for quantitative research data analysis. The purpose of this study is to compare the results of quantitative research data processing in the field of education management using Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS software for small samples or respondents. This research method is quantitative and research data analysis uses the four types of software to obtain a comparison of the results of the analysis. The analysis in this study focuses on the analysis of hypothesis testing and regression analysis. Regression analysis is used to measure how much influence the independent variable has on the dependent variable. The field of this research is education management and the research data uses quantitative data derived from questionnaire data for a small sample of 40 respondents with three research variables, namely the independent variable of transformational leadership and job satisfaction, while the dependent variable is teacher performance. Based on the results of the analysis using Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS software, the results showed that for a small sample there was no significant difference in the significance value of p-value and t-value. There is also no significant difference in the determination value, and the correlation value in the resulting structural equation also has no significant difference in results, while for CB-SEM represented by Lisrel, Tetrad cannot process data with a Little respondents size. The novelty of this research is the result of comparative analysis of Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS Agus PurwantoMasduki AsbariTeguh Iman SantosoDenok SunarsiDodi IlhamUniversitas Cokroaminoto Palopoarticleeducation managementdata analysisLisrelGSCATetrad AmosSmartPLSEducationLTheory and practice of educationLB5-3640ENIDJurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, Vol 4, Iss 2 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
ID
topic education management
data analysis
Lisrel
GSCA
Tetrad Amos
SmartPLS
Education
L
Theory and practice of education
LB5-3640
spellingShingle education management
data analysis
Lisrel
GSCA
Tetrad Amos
SmartPLS
Education
L
Theory and practice of education
LB5-3640
Agus Purwanto
Masduki Asbari
Teguh Iman Santoso
Denok Sunarsi
Dodi Ilham
Education Research Quantitative Analysis for Little Respondents
description Many researchers are confused about which software to use because there is no research on software comparisons for quantitative research data analysis. The purpose of this study is to compare the results of quantitative research data processing in the field of education management using Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS software for small samples or respondents. This research method is quantitative and research data analysis uses the four types of software to obtain a comparison of the results of the analysis. The analysis in this study focuses on the analysis of hypothesis testing and regression analysis. Regression analysis is used to measure how much influence the independent variable has on the dependent variable. The field of this research is education management and the research data uses quantitative data derived from questionnaire data for a small sample of 40 respondents with three research variables, namely the independent variable of transformational leadership and job satisfaction, while the dependent variable is teacher performance. Based on the results of the analysis using Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS software, the results showed that for a small sample there was no significant difference in the significance value of p-value and t-value. There is also no significant difference in the determination value, and the correlation value in the resulting structural equation also has no significant difference in results, while for CB-SEM represented by Lisrel, Tetrad cannot process data with a Little respondents size. The novelty of this research is the result of comparative analysis of Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS
format article
author Agus Purwanto
Masduki Asbari
Teguh Iman Santoso
Denok Sunarsi
Dodi Ilham
author_facet Agus Purwanto
Masduki Asbari
Teguh Iman Santoso
Denok Sunarsi
Dodi Ilham
author_sort Agus Purwanto
title Education Research Quantitative Analysis for Little Respondents
title_short Education Research Quantitative Analysis for Little Respondents
title_full Education Research Quantitative Analysis for Little Respondents
title_fullStr Education Research Quantitative Analysis for Little Respondents
title_full_unstemmed Education Research Quantitative Analysis for Little Respondents
title_sort education research quantitative analysis for little respondents
publisher Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/552f1c8c848b4f37b17a69fc473d8036
work_keys_str_mv AT aguspurwanto educationresearchquantitativeanalysisforlittlerespondents
AT masdukiasbari educationresearchquantitativeanalysisforlittlerespondents
AT teguhimansantoso educationresearchquantitativeanalysisforlittlerespondents
AT denoksunarsi educationresearchquantitativeanalysisforlittlerespondents
AT dodiilham educationresearchquantitativeanalysisforlittlerespondents
_version_ 1718399813455708160