Teaching nonscience majors about electromagnetic radiation

[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Curriculum Development: Theory into Design.] We discuss the theoretical underpinnings that informed the considerations and decisions that shaped the design of a curriculum unit entitled “Electromagnetic radiation—principles, applications, and decision...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shulamit Kapon, Hagar Veksler
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Physical Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/554401edda1e43b3b61d1c3c762d66f3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:554401edda1e43b3b61d1c3c762d66f3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:554401edda1e43b3b61d1c3c762d66f32021-12-02T14:09:02ZTeaching nonscience majors about electromagnetic radiation10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.0201412469-9896https://doaj.org/article/554401edda1e43b3b61d1c3c762d66f32020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020141http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020141https://doaj.org/toc/2469-9896[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Curriculum Development: Theory into Design.] We discuss the theoretical underpinnings that informed the considerations and decisions that shaped the design of a curriculum unit entitled “Electromagnetic radiation—principles, applications, and decisions”. This unit is part (45 h) of the compulsory general science requirement for the Israeli high school matriculation curriculum in science for students who choose not to major in any scientific discipline. Its goal is to develop scientific literacy rather than expertise. During the problematizing phase that preceded the design we identified two challenges presented by the formal goal of the unit and its target audience: (i) how to foster meaningful engagement on the part of diverse groups of “outsiders to science” with complex scientific content such as electromagnetic radiation, (ii) how to translate scientific and engineering findings related to a complex phenomenon such as electromagnetic radiation, which emerge within a context of specialized knowledge and vocabulary, into lay language without corrupting their meaning. The first section of this article explores these questions through a theoretical discussion of (i) relevance, personal relevance, and meaningfulness; (ii) the implications of pursuing personal relevance on the meaning ascribed to scientific literacy of nonscientists, and the ways to support its development in school; and (iii) the ways in which personal relevance comes to bear on the choice of content and explanatory means. We then illustrate how these theoretical principles and insights were translated into curriculum design.Shulamit KaponHagar VekslerAmerican Physical SocietyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691PhysicsQC1-999ENPhysical Review Physics Education Research, Vol 16, Iss 2, p 020141 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
Shulamit Kapon
Hagar Veksler
Teaching nonscience majors about electromagnetic radiation
description [This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Curriculum Development: Theory into Design.] We discuss the theoretical underpinnings that informed the considerations and decisions that shaped the design of a curriculum unit entitled “Electromagnetic radiation—principles, applications, and decisions”. This unit is part (45 h) of the compulsory general science requirement for the Israeli high school matriculation curriculum in science for students who choose not to major in any scientific discipline. Its goal is to develop scientific literacy rather than expertise. During the problematizing phase that preceded the design we identified two challenges presented by the formal goal of the unit and its target audience: (i) how to foster meaningful engagement on the part of diverse groups of “outsiders to science” with complex scientific content such as electromagnetic radiation, (ii) how to translate scientific and engineering findings related to a complex phenomenon such as electromagnetic radiation, which emerge within a context of specialized knowledge and vocabulary, into lay language without corrupting their meaning. The first section of this article explores these questions through a theoretical discussion of (i) relevance, personal relevance, and meaningfulness; (ii) the implications of pursuing personal relevance on the meaning ascribed to scientific literacy of nonscientists, and the ways to support its development in school; and (iii) the ways in which personal relevance comes to bear on the choice of content and explanatory means. We then illustrate how these theoretical principles and insights were translated into curriculum design.
format article
author Shulamit Kapon
Hagar Veksler
author_facet Shulamit Kapon
Hagar Veksler
author_sort Shulamit Kapon
title Teaching nonscience majors about electromagnetic radiation
title_short Teaching nonscience majors about electromagnetic radiation
title_full Teaching nonscience majors about electromagnetic radiation
title_fullStr Teaching nonscience majors about electromagnetic radiation
title_full_unstemmed Teaching nonscience majors about electromagnetic radiation
title_sort teaching nonscience majors about electromagnetic radiation
publisher American Physical Society
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/554401edda1e43b3b61d1c3c762d66f3
work_keys_str_mv AT shulamitkapon teachingnonsciencemajorsaboutelectromagneticradiation
AT hagarveksler teachingnonsciencemajorsaboutelectromagneticradiation
_version_ 1718391906942058496