How to Problematise Categories: Building the Methodological Toolbox for Linguistic Reflexivity

Following qualitative researchers’ growing interest in reflexivity, a body of scholarship has emerged that aims to turn informal practices for reflexivity into methods that can be learnt and taught alongside other research practices. This literature, however, has focused on helping researchers becom...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Audrey Alejandro
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	SAGE Publishing 2021
Materias:	Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/5556c900b9fd4e5b81a6804245f2d517
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:5556c900b9fd4e5b81a6804245f2d517
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:5556c900b9fd4e5b81a6804245f2d5172021-11-30T11:33:19ZHow to Problematise Categories: Building the Methodological Toolbox for Linguistic Reflexivity1609-406910.1177/16094069211055572https://doaj.org/article/5556c900b9fd4e5b81a6804245f2d5172021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211055572https://doaj.org/toc/1609-4069Following qualitative researchers’ growing interest in reflexivity, a body of scholarship has emerged that aims to turn informal practices for reflexivity into methods that can be learnt and taught alongside other research practices. This literature, however, has focused on helping researchers become more reflexive toward their situatedness and positionality, rather than toward their use of language and its effects on knowledge production – a process I refer to as ‘linguistic reflexivity’. This article addresses this gap by formalising a method for ‘problematising categories’, an informal approach familiar to qualitative researchers as a promising solution to the analytical and ethical blinders that result from scholars’ unconscious use of language. I proceed in three steps. First, I review the literature to show the analytical, empirical and ethical rationales behind this approach and offer a definition of problematising categories as the practice of making conscious how socio-linguistic units of categorisation unconsciously organise our perception and can represent a problem for knowledge production. This practice, I argue, enables us to decentre ourselves from the taken-for-granted nature of those categories. Second, I develop a three-stage research method for problematising categories: noticing ‘critical junctures' when problematisation is called for, identifying the categorical problem through sensitising questions and reconstructing an alternative. Third, I demonstrate how problematising categories contributes to the research process by applying this method to my experience in problematising the binary pair ‘local’ versus ‘international’ in a research project on the environmental impact of Chinese investment in the Senegalese fishery sector. I show that problematising categories leads to more rigorous empirical findings and nuanced analysis in a way that is feasible within the frame of qualitative research projects. Overall, this article expands the practical tools for linguistic reflexivity and heeds the methodological call to make conscious and explicit choices for every dimension of our research.Audrey AlejandroSAGE PublishingarticleSocial sciences (General)H1-99ENInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol 20 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	Social sciences (General) H1-99 Audrey Alejandro How to Problematise Categories: Building the Methodological Toolbox for Linguistic Reflexivity
description	Following qualitative researchers’ growing interest in reflexivity, a body of scholarship has emerged that aims to turn informal practices for reflexivity into methods that can be learnt and taught alongside other research practices. This literature, however, has focused on helping researchers become more reflexive toward their situatedness and positionality, rather than toward their use of language and its effects on knowledge production – a process I refer to as ‘linguistic reflexivity’. This article addresses this gap by formalising a method for ‘problematising categories’, an informal approach familiar to qualitative researchers as a promising solution to the analytical and ethical blinders that result from scholars’ unconscious use of language. I proceed in three steps. First, I review the literature to show the analytical, empirical and ethical rationales behind this approach and offer a definition of problematising categories as the practice of making conscious how socio-linguistic units of categorisation unconsciously organise our perception and can represent a problem for knowledge production. This practice, I argue, enables us to decentre ourselves from the taken-for-granted nature of those categories. Second, I develop a three-stage research method for problematising categories: noticing ‘critical junctures' when problematisation is called for, identifying the categorical problem through sensitising questions and reconstructing an alternative. Third, I demonstrate how problematising categories contributes to the research process by applying this method to my experience in problematising the binary pair ‘local’ versus ‘international’ in a research project on the environmental impact of Chinese investment in the Senegalese fishery sector. I show that problematising categories leads to more rigorous empirical findings and nuanced analysis in a way that is feasible within the frame of qualitative research projects. Overall, this article expands the practical tools for linguistic reflexivity and heeds the methodological call to make conscious and explicit choices for every dimension of our research.
format	article
author	Audrey Alejandro
author_facet	Audrey Alejandro
author_sort	Audrey Alejandro
title	How to Problematise Categories: Building the Methodological Toolbox for Linguistic Reflexivity
title_short	How to Problematise Categories: Building the Methodological Toolbox for Linguistic Reflexivity
title_full	How to Problematise Categories: Building the Methodological Toolbox for Linguistic Reflexivity
title_fullStr	How to Problematise Categories: Building the Methodological Toolbox for Linguistic Reflexivity
title_full_unstemmed	How to Problematise Categories: Building the Methodological Toolbox for Linguistic Reflexivity
title_sort	how to problematise categories: building the methodological toolbox for linguistic reflexivity
publisher	SAGE Publishing
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/5556c900b9fd4e5b81a6804245f2d517
work_keys_str_mv	AT audreyalejandro howtoproblematisecategoriesbuildingthemethodologicaltoolboxforlinguisticreflexivity
_version_	1718406622264426496

How to Problematise Categories: Building the Methodological Toolbox for Linguistic Reflexivity

Ejemplares similares