Plasticity in timing of avian breeding in response to spring temperature differs between early and late nesting species

Abstract Plasticity for breeding dates may influence population vulnerability to climate change via phenological mismatch between an organism’s life cycle requirements and resource availability in occupied environments. Some life history traits may constrain plasticity, however there have been remar...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: David J. Messmer, Ray T. Alisauskas, Hannu Pöysä, Pentti Runko, Robert G. Clark
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5561b8ca1d6f4e369b3e64b9d57e4761
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5561b8ca1d6f4e369b3e64b9d57e4761
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5561b8ca1d6f4e369b3e64b9d57e47612021-12-02T13:20:04ZPlasticity in timing of avian breeding in response to spring temperature differs between early and late nesting species10.1038/s41598-021-84160-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/5561b8ca1d6f4e369b3e64b9d57e47612021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84160-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Plasticity for breeding dates may influence population vulnerability to climate change via phenological mismatch between an organism’s life cycle requirements and resource availability in occupied environments. Some life history traits may constrain plasticity, however there have been remarkably few comparisons of how closely-related species, differing in key traits, respond to common phenology gradients. We compared population- and individual-level plasticity in clutch initiation dates (CID) in response to spring temperature among five duck species with early- to late-season nesting life histories. Plasticity was strongest in females of the earliest breeding species (common goldeneye [Bucephala clangula], mallard [Anas platyrhynchos], and gadwall [Mareca strepera]), whereas late-nesting lesser scaup (Aythya affinis) and white-winged scoter (Melanitta fusca deglandi) did not respond. These results contrast with previous work in other bird families that suggested late-breeders are generally more flexible. Nevertheless, late-breeding species exhibited annual variation in mean CID, suggesting response to other environmental factors unrelated to spring temperature. Goldeneye and gadwall females varied in their strength of individual plasticity (‘individual × environment’ interactions) and goldeneye and scoter females showed evidence of interannual repeatability of CID. Fitness consequences of CID plasticity in response to spring phenology, including trophic mechanisms and population consequences, warrant investigation.David J. MessmerRay T. AlisauskasHannu PöysäPentti RunkoRobert G. ClarkNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
David J. Messmer
Ray T. Alisauskas
Hannu Pöysä
Pentti Runko
Robert G. Clark
Plasticity in timing of avian breeding in response to spring temperature differs between early and late nesting species
description Abstract Plasticity for breeding dates may influence population vulnerability to climate change via phenological mismatch between an organism’s life cycle requirements and resource availability in occupied environments. Some life history traits may constrain plasticity, however there have been remarkably few comparisons of how closely-related species, differing in key traits, respond to common phenology gradients. We compared population- and individual-level plasticity in clutch initiation dates (CID) in response to spring temperature among five duck species with early- to late-season nesting life histories. Plasticity was strongest in females of the earliest breeding species (common goldeneye [Bucephala clangula], mallard [Anas platyrhynchos], and gadwall [Mareca strepera]), whereas late-nesting lesser scaup (Aythya affinis) and white-winged scoter (Melanitta fusca deglandi) did not respond. These results contrast with previous work in other bird families that suggested late-breeders are generally more flexible. Nevertheless, late-breeding species exhibited annual variation in mean CID, suggesting response to other environmental factors unrelated to spring temperature. Goldeneye and gadwall females varied in their strength of individual plasticity (‘individual × environment’ interactions) and goldeneye and scoter females showed evidence of interannual repeatability of CID. Fitness consequences of CID plasticity in response to spring phenology, including trophic mechanisms and population consequences, warrant investigation.
format article
author David J. Messmer
Ray T. Alisauskas
Hannu Pöysä
Pentti Runko
Robert G. Clark
author_facet David J. Messmer
Ray T. Alisauskas
Hannu Pöysä
Pentti Runko
Robert G. Clark
author_sort David J. Messmer
title Plasticity in timing of avian breeding in response to spring temperature differs between early and late nesting species
title_short Plasticity in timing of avian breeding in response to spring temperature differs between early and late nesting species
title_full Plasticity in timing of avian breeding in response to spring temperature differs between early and late nesting species
title_fullStr Plasticity in timing of avian breeding in response to spring temperature differs between early and late nesting species
title_full_unstemmed Plasticity in timing of avian breeding in response to spring temperature differs between early and late nesting species
title_sort plasticity in timing of avian breeding in response to spring temperature differs between early and late nesting species
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5561b8ca1d6f4e369b3e64b9d57e4761
work_keys_str_mv AT davidjmessmer plasticityintimingofavianbreedinginresponsetospringtemperaturediffersbetweenearlyandlatenestingspecies
AT raytalisauskas plasticityintimingofavianbreedinginresponsetospringtemperaturediffersbetweenearlyandlatenestingspecies
AT hannupoysa plasticityintimingofavianbreedinginresponsetospringtemperaturediffersbetweenearlyandlatenestingspecies
AT penttirunko plasticityintimingofavianbreedinginresponsetospringtemperaturediffersbetweenearlyandlatenestingspecies
AT robertgclark plasticityintimingofavianbreedinginresponsetospringtemperaturediffersbetweenearlyandlatenestingspecies
_version_ 1718393210770817024