The identification of effective welfare indicators for laboratory-housed macaques using a Delphi consultation process

Abstract Despite the importance for both animal welfare and scientific integrity of effective welfare assessment in non-human primates, there has been little or no consensus as what should be assessed. A Delphi consultation process was undertaken to identify the animal- and environment-based measure...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melissa A. Truelove, Jessica E. Martin, Fritha M. Langford, Matthew C. Leach
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/557aef0be1864712867599b8ac81bc01
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:557aef0be1864712867599b8ac81bc01
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:557aef0be1864712867599b8ac81bc012021-12-02T12:33:44ZThe identification of effective welfare indicators for laboratory-housed macaques using a Delphi consultation process10.1038/s41598-020-77437-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/557aef0be1864712867599b8ac81bc012020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77437-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Despite the importance for both animal welfare and scientific integrity of effective welfare assessment in non-human primates, there has been little or no consensus as what should be assessed. A Delphi consultation process was undertaken to identify the animal- and environment-based measures of welfare for laboratory-housed macaques and to determine their relative importance in on-site welfare assessments. One-hundred fifteen potential indictors were identified through a comprehensive literature search, followed by a two-round iterative electronic survey process to collect expert opinion. Stable group response and consensus about the validity, reliability, and feasibility of the proposed indicators (67.5% agreement) was achieved by the completion of Round Two. A substantially higher proportion of environment-based measures (72%: n = 44/61) were considered as valid, reliable, and feasible compared to the animal-based measures (22%: n = 12/54). The indicators that ranked most highly for assessing welfare were the presence of self-harm behaviours and the provision of social enrichment. This study provides an empirical basis upon which these indicators can be validated and then integrated into assessment tools developed for macaques and emphasises the need to include both animal- and environment-based indicators for accurate welfare monitoring.Melissa A. TrueloveJessica E. MartinFritha M. LangfordMatthew C. LeachNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Melissa A. Truelove
Jessica E. Martin
Fritha M. Langford
Matthew C. Leach
The identification of effective welfare indicators for laboratory-housed macaques using a Delphi consultation process
description Abstract Despite the importance for both animal welfare and scientific integrity of effective welfare assessment in non-human primates, there has been little or no consensus as what should be assessed. A Delphi consultation process was undertaken to identify the animal- and environment-based measures of welfare for laboratory-housed macaques and to determine their relative importance in on-site welfare assessments. One-hundred fifteen potential indictors were identified through a comprehensive literature search, followed by a two-round iterative electronic survey process to collect expert opinion. Stable group response and consensus about the validity, reliability, and feasibility of the proposed indicators (67.5% agreement) was achieved by the completion of Round Two. A substantially higher proportion of environment-based measures (72%: n = 44/61) were considered as valid, reliable, and feasible compared to the animal-based measures (22%: n = 12/54). The indicators that ranked most highly for assessing welfare were the presence of self-harm behaviours and the provision of social enrichment. This study provides an empirical basis upon which these indicators can be validated and then integrated into assessment tools developed for macaques and emphasises the need to include both animal- and environment-based indicators for accurate welfare monitoring.
format article
author Melissa A. Truelove
Jessica E. Martin
Fritha M. Langford
Matthew C. Leach
author_facet Melissa A. Truelove
Jessica E. Martin
Fritha M. Langford
Matthew C. Leach
author_sort Melissa A. Truelove
title The identification of effective welfare indicators for laboratory-housed macaques using a Delphi consultation process
title_short The identification of effective welfare indicators for laboratory-housed macaques using a Delphi consultation process
title_full The identification of effective welfare indicators for laboratory-housed macaques using a Delphi consultation process
title_fullStr The identification of effective welfare indicators for laboratory-housed macaques using a Delphi consultation process
title_full_unstemmed The identification of effective welfare indicators for laboratory-housed macaques using a Delphi consultation process
title_sort identification of effective welfare indicators for laboratory-housed macaques using a delphi consultation process
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/557aef0be1864712867599b8ac81bc01
work_keys_str_mv AT melissaatruelove theidentificationofeffectivewelfareindicatorsforlaboratoryhousedmacaquesusingadelphiconsultationprocess
AT jessicaemartin theidentificationofeffectivewelfareindicatorsforlaboratoryhousedmacaquesusingadelphiconsultationprocess
AT frithamlangford theidentificationofeffectivewelfareindicatorsforlaboratoryhousedmacaquesusingadelphiconsultationprocess
AT matthewcleach theidentificationofeffectivewelfareindicatorsforlaboratoryhousedmacaquesusingadelphiconsultationprocess
AT melissaatruelove identificationofeffectivewelfareindicatorsforlaboratoryhousedmacaquesusingadelphiconsultationprocess
AT jessicaemartin identificationofeffectivewelfareindicatorsforlaboratoryhousedmacaquesusingadelphiconsultationprocess
AT frithamlangford identificationofeffectivewelfareindicatorsforlaboratoryhousedmacaquesusingadelphiconsultationprocess
AT matthewcleach identificationofeffectivewelfareindicatorsforlaboratoryhousedmacaquesusingadelphiconsultationprocess
_version_ 1718393858988965888