Machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples
Abstract Somatic mutations in cancer driver genes can help diagnosis, prognosis and treatment decisions. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimen is the main source of DNA for somatic mutation detection. To overcome constraints of DNA isolated from FFPE, we compared pyrosequencing and ddPCR...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/55aa917f941f45fd82d24a098048504b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:55aa917f941f45fd82d24a098048504b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:55aa917f941f45fd82d24a098048504b2021-12-02T17:40:47ZMachine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples10.1038/s41598-021-92014-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/55aa917f941f45fd82d24a098048504b2021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92014-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Somatic mutations in cancer driver genes can help diagnosis, prognosis and treatment decisions. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimen is the main source of DNA for somatic mutation detection. To overcome constraints of DNA isolated from FFPE, we compared pyrosequencing and ddPCR analysis for absolute quantification of BRAF V600E mutation in the DNA extracted from FFPE specimens and compared the results to the qualitative detection information obtained by Sanger Sequencing. Sanger sequencing was able to detect BRAF V600E mutation only when it was present in more than 15% total alleles. Although the sensitivity of ddPCR is higher than that observed for Sanger, it was less consistent than pyrosequencing, likely due to droplet classification bias of FFPE-derived DNA. To address the droplet allocation bias in ddPCR analysis, we have compared different algorithms for automated droplet classification and next correlated these findings with those obtained from pyrosequencing. By examining the addition of non-classifiable droplets (rain) in ddPCR, it was possible to obtain better qualitative classification of droplets and better quantitative classification compared to no rain droplets, when considering pyrosequencing results. Notable, only the Machine learning k-NN algorithm was able to automatically classify the samples, surpassing manual classification based on no-template controls, which shows promise in clinical practice.Gabriel A. Colozza-GamaFabiano CallegariNikola BešičAna C. de J. PavizaJanete M. CeruttiNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Gabriel A. Colozza-Gama Fabiano Callegari Nikola Bešič Ana C. de J. Paviza Janete M. Cerutti Machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples |
description |
Abstract Somatic mutations in cancer driver genes can help diagnosis, prognosis and treatment decisions. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimen is the main source of DNA for somatic mutation detection. To overcome constraints of DNA isolated from FFPE, we compared pyrosequencing and ddPCR analysis for absolute quantification of BRAF V600E mutation in the DNA extracted from FFPE specimens and compared the results to the qualitative detection information obtained by Sanger Sequencing. Sanger sequencing was able to detect BRAF V600E mutation only when it was present in more than 15% total alleles. Although the sensitivity of ddPCR is higher than that observed for Sanger, it was less consistent than pyrosequencing, likely due to droplet classification bias of FFPE-derived DNA. To address the droplet allocation bias in ddPCR analysis, we have compared different algorithms for automated droplet classification and next correlated these findings with those obtained from pyrosequencing. By examining the addition of non-classifiable droplets (rain) in ddPCR, it was possible to obtain better qualitative classification of droplets and better quantitative classification compared to no rain droplets, when considering pyrosequencing results. Notable, only the Machine learning k-NN algorithm was able to automatically classify the samples, surpassing manual classification based on no-template controls, which shows promise in clinical practice. |
format |
article |
author |
Gabriel A. Colozza-Gama Fabiano Callegari Nikola Bešič Ana C. de J. Paviza Janete M. Cerutti |
author_facet |
Gabriel A. Colozza-Gama Fabiano Callegari Nikola Bešič Ana C. de J. Paviza Janete M. Cerutti |
author_sort |
Gabriel A. Colozza-Gama |
title |
Machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples |
title_short |
Machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples |
title_full |
Machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples |
title_fullStr |
Machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples |
title_full_unstemmed |
Machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples |
title_sort |
machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddpcr for detection of braf v600e in paraffin-embedded samples |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/55aa917f941f45fd82d24a098048504b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gabrielacolozzagama machinelearningalgorithmimprovedautomateddropletclassificationofddpcrfordetectionofbrafv600einparaffinembeddedsamples AT fabianocallegari machinelearningalgorithmimprovedautomateddropletclassificationofddpcrfordetectionofbrafv600einparaffinembeddedsamples AT nikolabesic machinelearningalgorithmimprovedautomateddropletclassificationofddpcrfordetectionofbrafv600einparaffinembeddedsamples AT anacdejpaviza machinelearningalgorithmimprovedautomateddropletclassificationofddpcrfordetectionofbrafv600einparaffinembeddedsamples AT janetemcerutti machinelearningalgorithmimprovedautomateddropletclassificationofddpcrfordetectionofbrafv600einparaffinembeddedsamples |
_version_ |
1718379763191513088 |