Machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples

Abstract Somatic mutations in cancer driver genes can help diagnosis, prognosis and treatment decisions. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimen is the main source of DNA for somatic mutation detection. To overcome constraints of DNA isolated from FFPE, we compared pyrosequencing and ddPCR...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gabriel A. Colozza-Gama, Fabiano Callegari, Nikola Bešič, Ana C. de J. Paviza, Janete M. Cerutti
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/55aa917f941f45fd82d24a098048504b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:55aa917f941f45fd82d24a098048504b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:55aa917f941f45fd82d24a098048504b2021-12-02T17:40:47ZMachine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples10.1038/s41598-021-92014-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/55aa917f941f45fd82d24a098048504b2021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92014-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Somatic mutations in cancer driver genes can help diagnosis, prognosis and treatment decisions. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimen is the main source of DNA for somatic mutation detection. To overcome constraints of DNA isolated from FFPE, we compared pyrosequencing and ddPCR analysis for absolute quantification of BRAF V600E mutation in the DNA extracted from FFPE specimens and compared the results to the qualitative detection information obtained by Sanger Sequencing. Sanger sequencing was able to detect BRAF V600E mutation only when it was present in more than 15% total alleles. Although the sensitivity of ddPCR is higher than that observed for Sanger, it was less consistent than pyrosequencing, likely due to droplet classification bias of FFPE-derived DNA. To address the droplet allocation bias in ddPCR analysis, we have compared different algorithms for automated droplet classification and next correlated these findings with those obtained from pyrosequencing. By examining the addition of non-classifiable droplets (rain) in ddPCR, it was possible to obtain better qualitative classification of droplets and better quantitative classification compared to no rain droplets, when considering pyrosequencing results. Notable, only the Machine learning k-NN algorithm was able to automatically classify the samples, surpassing manual classification based on no-template controls, which shows promise in clinical practice.Gabriel A. Colozza-GamaFabiano CallegariNikola BešičAna C. de J. PavizaJanete M. CeruttiNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Gabriel A. Colozza-Gama
Fabiano Callegari
Nikola Bešič
Ana C. de J. Paviza
Janete M. Cerutti
Machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples
description Abstract Somatic mutations in cancer driver genes can help diagnosis, prognosis and treatment decisions. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimen is the main source of DNA for somatic mutation detection. To overcome constraints of DNA isolated from FFPE, we compared pyrosequencing and ddPCR analysis for absolute quantification of BRAF V600E mutation in the DNA extracted from FFPE specimens and compared the results to the qualitative detection information obtained by Sanger Sequencing. Sanger sequencing was able to detect BRAF V600E mutation only when it was present in more than 15% total alleles. Although the sensitivity of ddPCR is higher than that observed for Sanger, it was less consistent than pyrosequencing, likely due to droplet classification bias of FFPE-derived DNA. To address the droplet allocation bias in ddPCR analysis, we have compared different algorithms for automated droplet classification and next correlated these findings with those obtained from pyrosequencing. By examining the addition of non-classifiable droplets (rain) in ddPCR, it was possible to obtain better qualitative classification of droplets and better quantitative classification compared to no rain droplets, when considering pyrosequencing results. Notable, only the Machine learning k-NN algorithm was able to automatically classify the samples, surpassing manual classification based on no-template controls, which shows promise in clinical practice.
format article
author Gabriel A. Colozza-Gama
Fabiano Callegari
Nikola Bešič
Ana C. de J. Paviza
Janete M. Cerutti
author_facet Gabriel A. Colozza-Gama
Fabiano Callegari
Nikola Bešič
Ana C. de J. Paviza
Janete M. Cerutti
author_sort Gabriel A. Colozza-Gama
title Machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples
title_short Machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples
title_full Machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples
title_fullStr Machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddPCR for detection of BRAF V600E in paraffin-embedded samples
title_sort machine learning algorithm improved automated droplet classification of ddpcr for detection of braf v600e in paraffin-embedded samples
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/55aa917f941f45fd82d24a098048504b
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielacolozzagama machinelearningalgorithmimprovedautomateddropletclassificationofddpcrfordetectionofbrafv600einparaffinembeddedsamples
AT fabianocallegari machinelearningalgorithmimprovedautomateddropletclassificationofddpcrfordetectionofbrafv600einparaffinembeddedsamples
AT nikolabesic machinelearningalgorithmimprovedautomateddropletclassificationofddpcrfordetectionofbrafv600einparaffinembeddedsamples
AT anacdejpaviza machinelearningalgorithmimprovedautomateddropletclassificationofddpcrfordetectionofbrafv600einparaffinembeddedsamples
AT janetemcerutti machinelearningalgorithmimprovedautomateddropletclassificationofddpcrfordetectionofbrafv600einparaffinembeddedsamples
_version_ 1718379763191513088