Bifurcation of Corporate Management: Traditional and Innovation Logics

In conditions of the global management crisis caused by COVID-19 the issues dealing with management efficiency become especially topical. Integrated corporate structures embracing big banks and corporations make the basis both for economic and political force. Though the disintegration strategy is b...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	X. V. Sadykova
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Plekhanov Russian University of Economics 2021
Materias:	ir-strategy agent theory corporate strategy strategic management and development integrated corporate structure board of directors freedman theory stakeholder theory theory of triple criterion phantom shares Economics as a science HB71-74
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/55b26aa09d2b45c2be51e7e5c28f764c
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:55b26aa09d2b45c2be51e7e5c28f764c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:55b26aa09d2b45c2be51e7e5c28f764c2021-11-15T05:20:50ZBifurcation of Corporate Management: Traditional and Innovation Logics2413-28292587-925110.21686/2413-2829-2021-1-154-158https://doaj.org/article/55b26aa09d2b45c2be51e7e5c28f764c2021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://vest.rea.ru/jour/article/view/1016https://doaj.org/toc/2413-2829https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9251In conditions of the global management crisis caused by COVID-19 the issues dealing with management efficiency become especially topical. Integrated corporate structures embracing big banks and corporations make the basis both for economic and political force. Though the disintegration strategy is becoming more and more popular, multinational companies are not weakened and continue influencing governments of many countries of the world. Decisions made in these organizations can impact not only economy of a certain country, its ecology, social policy but often the future of states and regions. That is why corporate strategies, which should be relevant to present day realities, become so important. Today the majority of integrated corporate structures stick to traditional logics in corporate management realizing it within the frames of Freedman theory. The article compares and summarizes traditional and innovation theories of corporate management, shows their advantages and drawbacks, analyzes the experience of big global companies and provides legal substantiation of splitting responsibility inside corporations. An attempt was made to prove groundlessness of traditional logics of profit maximization in today’s world and to identify ways to shifting focus to the company development.X. V. SadykovaPlekhanov Russian University of Economicsarticleir-strategyagent theorycorporate strategystrategic management and developmentintegrated corporate structureboard of directorsfreedman theorystakeholder theorytheory of triple criterionphantom sharesEconomics as a scienceHB71-74RUВестник Российского экономического университета имени Г. В. Плеханова, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 154-158 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	ir-strategy agent theory corporate strategy strategic management and development integrated corporate structure board of directors freedman theory stakeholder theory theory of triple criterion phantom shares Economics as a science HB71-74
spellingShingle	ir-strategy agent theory corporate strategy strategic management and development integrated corporate structure board of directors freedman theory stakeholder theory theory of triple criterion phantom shares Economics as a science HB71-74 X. V. Sadykova Bifurcation of Corporate Management: Traditional and Innovation Logics
description	In conditions of the global management crisis caused by COVID-19 the issues dealing with management efficiency become especially topical. Integrated corporate structures embracing big banks and corporations make the basis both for economic and political force. Though the disintegration strategy is becoming more and more popular, multinational companies are not weakened and continue influencing governments of many countries of the world. Decisions made in these organizations can impact not only economy of a certain country, its ecology, social policy but often the future of states and regions. That is why corporate strategies, which should be relevant to present day realities, become so important. Today the majority of integrated corporate structures stick to traditional logics in corporate management realizing it within the frames of Freedman theory. The article compares and summarizes traditional and innovation theories of corporate management, shows their advantages and drawbacks, analyzes the experience of big global companies and provides legal substantiation of splitting responsibility inside corporations. An attempt was made to prove groundlessness of traditional logics of profit maximization in today’s world and to identify ways to shifting focus to the company development.
format	article
author	X. V. Sadykova
author_facet	X. V. Sadykova
author_sort	X. V. Sadykova
title	Bifurcation of Corporate Management: Traditional and Innovation Logics
title_short	Bifurcation of Corporate Management: Traditional and Innovation Logics
title_full	Bifurcation of Corporate Management: Traditional and Innovation Logics
title_fullStr	Bifurcation of Corporate Management: Traditional and Innovation Logics
title_full_unstemmed	Bifurcation of Corporate Management: Traditional and Innovation Logics
title_sort	bifurcation of corporate management: traditional and innovation logics
publisher	Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/55b26aa09d2b45c2be51e7e5c28f764c
work_keys_str_mv	AT xvsadykova bifurcationofcorporatemanagementtraditionalandinnovationlogics
_version_	1718428615012515840

Bifurcation of Corporate Management: Traditional and Innovation Logics

Ejemplares similares