Dietary and non-dietary contributions to among-individual variation in carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of lake trout

Variation among individuals in stable isotope composition is increasingly being used as an ecological index of trophic niche size. This is based on the assumption that most of the observed variation arises from differences in diet. We tested this assumption by comparing variability in C and N isotop...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: T.A. Johnston, A.D. Ehrman, J.J. Montgomery, H.K. Swanson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/55f87b100336438186c77d548c932f23
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:55f87b100336438186c77d548c932f23
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:55f87b100336438186c77d548c932f232021-12-01T04:43:39ZDietary and non-dietary contributions to among-individual variation in carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of lake trout1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107349https://doaj.org/article/55f87b100336438186c77d548c932f232021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21000145https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XVariation among individuals in stable isotope composition is increasingly being used as an ecological index of trophic niche size. This is based on the assumption that most of the observed variation arises from differences in diet. We tested this assumption by comparing variability in C and N isotopic compositions of adult female lake trout in five wild populations with those of their captive counterparts reared on a common diet, using mature ova as the tissue of comparison. Variation in δ13C and δ15N were related to female size and age, and to a lesser extent growth rate, in both wild and captive fish but relationships were generally stronger for wild fish. Variation among strains in mean δ13C and δ15N was much lower in captive than wild fish, but δ13C and δ15N still varied significantly among strains for the captive fish. As expected, the magnitude and orientation of individual dispersion in δ15N – δ13C space (ID) was much less variable among captive populations than among wild populations. The ID of captive populations expressed as a percentage of the ID of corresponding wild populations ranged from 3 to 16% when δ13C and δ15N were adjusted for body size covariation, and from 3 to 28% when data were not adjusted. Relationships between ID and growth rate at the population level were positive for captive lake trout and negative for wild lake trout but neither were significant. Our results suggest that non-dietary variation in δ13C and δ15N is usually a small component of the δ13C and δ15N variation seen in wild lake trout populations and current isotopic niche metrics primarily capture dietary variation.T.A. JohnstonA.D. EhrmanJ.J. MontgomeryH.K. SwansonElsevierarticleStable isotopesTrophic ecologyNiche metricsFishEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 123, Iss , Pp 107349- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Stable isotopes
Trophic ecology
Niche metrics
Fish
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Stable isotopes
Trophic ecology
Niche metrics
Fish
Ecology
QH540-549.5
T.A. Johnston
A.D. Ehrman
J.J. Montgomery
H.K. Swanson
Dietary and non-dietary contributions to among-individual variation in carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of lake trout
description Variation among individuals in stable isotope composition is increasingly being used as an ecological index of trophic niche size. This is based on the assumption that most of the observed variation arises from differences in diet. We tested this assumption by comparing variability in C and N isotopic compositions of adult female lake trout in five wild populations with those of their captive counterparts reared on a common diet, using mature ova as the tissue of comparison. Variation in δ13C and δ15N were related to female size and age, and to a lesser extent growth rate, in both wild and captive fish but relationships were generally stronger for wild fish. Variation among strains in mean δ13C and δ15N was much lower in captive than wild fish, but δ13C and δ15N still varied significantly among strains for the captive fish. As expected, the magnitude and orientation of individual dispersion in δ15N – δ13C space (ID) was much less variable among captive populations than among wild populations. The ID of captive populations expressed as a percentage of the ID of corresponding wild populations ranged from 3 to 16% when δ13C and δ15N were adjusted for body size covariation, and from 3 to 28% when data were not adjusted. Relationships between ID and growth rate at the population level were positive for captive lake trout and negative for wild lake trout but neither were significant. Our results suggest that non-dietary variation in δ13C and δ15N is usually a small component of the δ13C and δ15N variation seen in wild lake trout populations and current isotopic niche metrics primarily capture dietary variation.
format article
author T.A. Johnston
A.D. Ehrman
J.J. Montgomery
H.K. Swanson
author_facet T.A. Johnston
A.D. Ehrman
J.J. Montgomery
H.K. Swanson
author_sort T.A. Johnston
title Dietary and non-dietary contributions to among-individual variation in carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of lake trout
title_short Dietary and non-dietary contributions to among-individual variation in carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of lake trout
title_full Dietary and non-dietary contributions to among-individual variation in carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of lake trout
title_fullStr Dietary and non-dietary contributions to among-individual variation in carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of lake trout
title_full_unstemmed Dietary and non-dietary contributions to among-individual variation in carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of lake trout
title_sort dietary and non-dietary contributions to among-individual variation in carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of lake trout
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/55f87b100336438186c77d548c932f23
work_keys_str_mv AT tajohnston dietaryandnondietarycontributionstoamongindividualvariationincarbonandnitrogenisotopiccompositionoflaketrout
AT adehrman dietaryandnondietarycontributionstoamongindividualvariationincarbonandnitrogenisotopiccompositionoflaketrout
AT jjmontgomery dietaryandnondietarycontributionstoamongindividualvariationincarbonandnitrogenisotopiccompositionoflaketrout
AT hkswanson dietaryandnondietarycontributionstoamongindividualvariationincarbonandnitrogenisotopiccompositionoflaketrout
_version_ 1718405774692057088