Association and exclusion: the paradox of liberal constitutionalism

<p>This paper argues that a central paradox of liberal constitutionalism can be found by closely examining the freedom of association.  Freedom of association includes the right not to associate; thus a regime of individual rights facilitates the creation of marginalized individuals an...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: H.N. Hirsch
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Amsterdam Law Forum 2011
Materias:
Law
K
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/55faed4b54154bd28a85360beb486fa0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:55faed4b54154bd28a85360beb486fa0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:55faed4b54154bd28a85360beb486fa02021-12-02T07:46:58ZAssociation and exclusion: the paradox of liberal constitutionalism1876-8156https://doaj.org/article/55faed4b54154bd28a85360beb486fa02011-05-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ojs.ubvu.vu.nl/alf/article/view/204https://doaj.org/toc/1876-8156<p>This paper argues that a central paradox of liberal constitutionalism can be found by closely examining the freedom of association.  Freedom of association includes the right not to associate; thus a regime of individual rights facilitates the creation of marginalized individuals and groups.  These groups then seek social recognition, which liberal constitutionalism cannot easily grant, unless the state itself becomes complicit in discriminatory action.  The existence and protection of a sphere of civil society is thus a key mechanism of both freedom and inequality.  The paper uses American case law to explore this paradox, and to examine the status and likely strategy of societal pariah groups, and then examines the manner in which liberal political theory (Hannah Arendt, Nancy Rosenblum, Amy Gutmann, Iris Marion Young) address related questions.</p>H.N. HirschAmsterdam Law Forumarticleliberal constitutionalismindividual rightsliberal political theoryLawKENAmsterdam Law Forum, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 27-42 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic liberal constitutionalism
individual rights
liberal political theory
Law
K
spellingShingle liberal constitutionalism
individual rights
liberal political theory
Law
K
H.N. Hirsch
Association and exclusion: the paradox of liberal constitutionalism
description <p>This paper argues that a central paradox of liberal constitutionalism can be found by closely examining the freedom of association.  Freedom of association includes the right not to associate; thus a regime of individual rights facilitates the creation of marginalized individuals and groups.  These groups then seek social recognition, which liberal constitutionalism cannot easily grant, unless the state itself becomes complicit in discriminatory action.  The existence and protection of a sphere of civil society is thus a key mechanism of both freedom and inequality.  The paper uses American case law to explore this paradox, and to examine the status and likely strategy of societal pariah groups, and then examines the manner in which liberal political theory (Hannah Arendt, Nancy Rosenblum, Amy Gutmann, Iris Marion Young) address related questions.</p>
format article
author H.N. Hirsch
author_facet H.N. Hirsch
author_sort H.N. Hirsch
title Association and exclusion: the paradox of liberal constitutionalism
title_short Association and exclusion: the paradox of liberal constitutionalism
title_full Association and exclusion: the paradox of liberal constitutionalism
title_fullStr Association and exclusion: the paradox of liberal constitutionalism
title_full_unstemmed Association and exclusion: the paradox of liberal constitutionalism
title_sort association and exclusion: the paradox of liberal constitutionalism
publisher Amsterdam Law Forum
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/55faed4b54154bd28a85360beb486fa0
work_keys_str_mv AT hnhirsch associationandexclusiontheparadoxofliberalconstitutionalism
_version_ 1718399154616532992