Classification tree analysis for an intersectionality-informed identification of population groups with non-daily vegetable intake

Abstract Background Daily vegetable intake is considered an important behavioural health resource associated with improved immune function and lower incidence of non-communicable disease. Analyses of population-based data show that being female and having a high educational status is most strongly a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emily Mena, Gabriele Bolte, on behalf of the Advance Gender study group
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/56355ac263f4430d9e8a29b8f51c6f3e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:56355ac263f4430d9e8a29b8f51c6f3e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:56355ac263f4430d9e8a29b8f51c6f3e2021-11-08T10:43:51ZClassification tree analysis for an intersectionality-informed identification of population groups with non-daily vegetable intake10.1186/s12889-021-12043-61471-2458https://doaj.org/article/56355ac263f4430d9e8a29b8f51c6f3e2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12043-6https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458Abstract Background Daily vegetable intake is considered an important behavioural health resource associated with improved immune function and lower incidence of non-communicable disease. Analyses of population-based data show that being female and having a high educational status is most strongly associated with increased vegetable intake. In contrast, men and individuals with a low educational status seem to be most affected by non-daily vegetable intake (non-DVI). From an intersectionality perspective, health inequalities are seen as a consequence of an unequal balance of power such as persisting gender inequality. Unravelling intersections of socially driven aspects underlying inequalities might be achieved by not relying exclusively on the male/female binary, but by considering different facets of gender roles as well. This study aims to analyse possible interactions of sex/gender or sex/gender related aspects with a variety of different socio-cultural, socio-demographic and socio-economic variables with regard to non-DVI as the health-related outcome. Method Comparative classification tree analyses with classification and regression tree (CART) and conditional inference tree (CIT) as quantitative, non-parametric, exploratory methods for the detection of subgroups with high prevalence of non-DVI were performed. Complete-case analyses (n = 19,512) were based on cross-sectional data from a National Health Telephone Interview Survey conducted in Germany. Results The CART-algorithm constructed overall smaller trees when compared to CIT, but the subgroups detected by CART were also detected by CIT. The most strongly differentiating factor for non-DVI, when not considering any further sex/gender related aspects, was the male/female binary with a non-DVI prevalence of 61.7% in men and 42.7% in women. However, the inclusion of further sex/gender related aspects revealed a more heterogenous distribution of non-DVI across the sample, bringing gendered differences in main earner status and being a blue-collar worker to the foreground. In blue-collar workers who do not live with a partner on whom they can rely on financially, the non-DVI prevalence was 69.6% in men and 57.4% in women respectively. Conclusions Public health monitoring and reporting with an intersectionality-informed and gender-equitable perspective might benefit from an integration of further sex/gender related aspects into quantitative analyses in order to detect population subgroups most affected by non-DVI.Emily MenaGabriele Bolteon behalf of the Advance Gender study groupBMCarticleIntersectionalityPublic health monitoringPublic health reportingSex/genderGender rolesVegetable intakePublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENBMC Public Health, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Intersectionality
Public health monitoring
Public health reporting
Sex/gender
Gender roles
Vegetable intake
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Intersectionality
Public health monitoring
Public health reporting
Sex/gender
Gender roles
Vegetable intake
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Emily Mena
Gabriele Bolte
on behalf of the Advance Gender study group
Classification tree analysis for an intersectionality-informed identification of population groups with non-daily vegetable intake
description Abstract Background Daily vegetable intake is considered an important behavioural health resource associated with improved immune function and lower incidence of non-communicable disease. Analyses of population-based data show that being female and having a high educational status is most strongly associated with increased vegetable intake. In contrast, men and individuals with a low educational status seem to be most affected by non-daily vegetable intake (non-DVI). From an intersectionality perspective, health inequalities are seen as a consequence of an unequal balance of power such as persisting gender inequality. Unravelling intersections of socially driven aspects underlying inequalities might be achieved by not relying exclusively on the male/female binary, but by considering different facets of gender roles as well. This study aims to analyse possible interactions of sex/gender or sex/gender related aspects with a variety of different socio-cultural, socio-demographic and socio-economic variables with regard to non-DVI as the health-related outcome. Method Comparative classification tree analyses with classification and regression tree (CART) and conditional inference tree (CIT) as quantitative, non-parametric, exploratory methods for the detection of subgroups with high prevalence of non-DVI were performed. Complete-case analyses (n = 19,512) were based on cross-sectional data from a National Health Telephone Interview Survey conducted in Germany. Results The CART-algorithm constructed overall smaller trees when compared to CIT, but the subgroups detected by CART were also detected by CIT. The most strongly differentiating factor for non-DVI, when not considering any further sex/gender related aspects, was the male/female binary with a non-DVI prevalence of 61.7% in men and 42.7% in women. However, the inclusion of further sex/gender related aspects revealed a more heterogenous distribution of non-DVI across the sample, bringing gendered differences in main earner status and being a blue-collar worker to the foreground. In blue-collar workers who do not live with a partner on whom they can rely on financially, the non-DVI prevalence was 69.6% in men and 57.4% in women respectively. Conclusions Public health monitoring and reporting with an intersectionality-informed and gender-equitable perspective might benefit from an integration of further sex/gender related aspects into quantitative analyses in order to detect population subgroups most affected by non-DVI.
format article
author Emily Mena
Gabriele Bolte
on behalf of the Advance Gender study group
author_facet Emily Mena
Gabriele Bolte
on behalf of the Advance Gender study group
author_sort Emily Mena
title Classification tree analysis for an intersectionality-informed identification of population groups with non-daily vegetable intake
title_short Classification tree analysis for an intersectionality-informed identification of population groups with non-daily vegetable intake
title_full Classification tree analysis for an intersectionality-informed identification of population groups with non-daily vegetable intake
title_fullStr Classification tree analysis for an intersectionality-informed identification of population groups with non-daily vegetable intake
title_full_unstemmed Classification tree analysis for an intersectionality-informed identification of population groups with non-daily vegetable intake
title_sort classification tree analysis for an intersectionality-informed identification of population groups with non-daily vegetable intake
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/56355ac263f4430d9e8a29b8f51c6f3e
work_keys_str_mv AT emilymena classificationtreeanalysisforanintersectionalityinformedidentificationofpopulationgroupswithnondailyvegetableintake
AT gabrielebolte classificationtreeanalysisforanintersectionalityinformedidentificationofpopulationgroupswithnondailyvegetableintake
AT onbehalfoftheadvancegenderstudygroup classificationtreeanalysisforanintersectionalityinformedidentificationofpopulationgroupswithnondailyvegetableintake
_version_ 1718442714745274368