The osseointegration and stability of dental implants with different surface treatments in animal models: a network meta-analysis

Abstract Dental implants are commonly used to repair missing teeth. The implant surface plays a critical role in promoting osseointegration and implant success. However, little information is available about which implant surface treatment technology best promotes osseointegration and implant stabil...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chun-Ping Hao, Nan-Jue Cao, Yu-He Zhu, Wei Wang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/565173305b37437da18d0d93566c5229
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:565173305b37437da18d0d93566c5229
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:565173305b37437da18d0d93566c52292021-12-02T15:23:08ZThe osseointegration and stability of dental implants with different surface treatments in animal models: a network meta-analysis10.1038/s41598-021-93307-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/565173305b37437da18d0d93566c52292021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93307-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Dental implants are commonly used to repair missing teeth. The implant surface plays a critical role in promoting osseointegration and implant success. However, little information is available about which implant surface treatment technology best promotes osseointegration and implant stability. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to evaluate the osseointegration and stability of four commonly used dental implants (SLA, SLActive, TiUnite, and Osseotite). The protocol of the current meta-analysis is registered in PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) under the code CRD42020190907 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk ). We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA and Cochrane Recommendations. Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Embase, and the Web of Science databases were searched. Only randomized controlled trials were considered. Twelve studies were included in the current network meta-analysis, eleven studies were included concerning the osseointegration effect and five studies were included for stability analysis (four studies were used to assess both stability and osseointegration). Rank possibility shows that the SLActive surface best promoted bone formation at an early healing stage and TiUnite seemed to be the best surface for overall osseointegration. For stability, TiUnite seemed to be the best surface. The present network meta-analysis showed that the SLActive surface has the potential to promote osseointegration at an early stage. The TiUnite surface had the best effect on osseointegration regarding the overall healing period. The TiUnite surface also had the best effect in stability.Chun-Ping HaoNan-Jue CaoYu-He ZhuWei WangNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Chun-Ping Hao
Nan-Jue Cao
Yu-He Zhu
Wei Wang
The osseointegration and stability of dental implants with different surface treatments in animal models: a network meta-analysis
description Abstract Dental implants are commonly used to repair missing teeth. The implant surface plays a critical role in promoting osseointegration and implant success. However, little information is available about which implant surface treatment technology best promotes osseointegration and implant stability. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to evaluate the osseointegration and stability of four commonly used dental implants (SLA, SLActive, TiUnite, and Osseotite). The protocol of the current meta-analysis is registered in PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) under the code CRD42020190907 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk ). We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA and Cochrane Recommendations. Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Embase, and the Web of Science databases were searched. Only randomized controlled trials were considered. Twelve studies were included in the current network meta-analysis, eleven studies were included concerning the osseointegration effect and five studies were included for stability analysis (four studies were used to assess both stability and osseointegration). Rank possibility shows that the SLActive surface best promoted bone formation at an early healing stage and TiUnite seemed to be the best surface for overall osseointegration. For stability, TiUnite seemed to be the best surface. The present network meta-analysis showed that the SLActive surface has the potential to promote osseointegration at an early stage. The TiUnite surface had the best effect on osseointegration regarding the overall healing period. The TiUnite surface also had the best effect in stability.
format article
author Chun-Ping Hao
Nan-Jue Cao
Yu-He Zhu
Wei Wang
author_facet Chun-Ping Hao
Nan-Jue Cao
Yu-He Zhu
Wei Wang
author_sort Chun-Ping Hao
title The osseointegration and stability of dental implants with different surface treatments in animal models: a network meta-analysis
title_short The osseointegration and stability of dental implants with different surface treatments in animal models: a network meta-analysis
title_full The osseointegration and stability of dental implants with different surface treatments in animal models: a network meta-analysis
title_fullStr The osseointegration and stability of dental implants with different surface treatments in animal models: a network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The osseointegration and stability of dental implants with different surface treatments in animal models: a network meta-analysis
title_sort osseointegration and stability of dental implants with different surface treatments in animal models: a network meta-analysis
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/565173305b37437da18d0d93566c5229
work_keys_str_mv AT chunpinghao theosseointegrationandstabilityofdentalimplantswithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsinanimalmodelsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT nanjuecao theosseointegrationandstabilityofdentalimplantswithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsinanimalmodelsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT yuhezhu theosseointegrationandstabilityofdentalimplantswithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsinanimalmodelsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT weiwang theosseointegrationandstabilityofdentalimplantswithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsinanimalmodelsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT chunpinghao osseointegrationandstabilityofdentalimplantswithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsinanimalmodelsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT nanjuecao osseointegrationandstabilityofdentalimplantswithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsinanimalmodelsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT yuhezhu osseointegrationandstabilityofdentalimplantswithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsinanimalmodelsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT weiwang osseointegrationandstabilityofdentalimplantswithdifferentsurfacetreatmentsinanimalmodelsanetworkmetaanalysis
_version_ 1718387325210198016