Indoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context
Over the past decades, Southern European residential architecture has been typically associated with heavyweight hollow brick masonry and reinforced concrete construction systems; however, more industrialised alternative systems have been gaining a significant market share, such as the light steel f...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/56785e52f9134ad7a3c6cc604b2c6df2 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:56785e52f9134ad7a3c6cc604b2c6df2 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:56785e52f9134ad7a3c6cc604b2c6df22021-11-11T15:50:40ZIndoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context10.3390/en142170251996-1073https://doaj.org/article/56785e52f9134ad7a3c6cc604b2c6df22021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7025https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073Over the past decades, Southern European residential architecture has been typically associated with heavyweight hollow brick masonry and reinforced concrete construction systems; however, more industrialised alternative systems have been gaining a significant market share, such as the light steel framing (LSF). Regardless of the proliferation of LSF buildings, a lack of experimental research studies have been performed on this construction system in terms of the indoor thermal environment and thermal comfort in the Southern European climate context. Moreover, a research gap also exists regarding experimental comparisons with typical brick masonry buildings. The present study focused on this research gap by characterising and comparing the performance of these two construction systems. A long-term experimental campaign was carried out, involving the construction and monitoring of two identical test cells, differing only by construction system. The test cells were located in Portugal and were monitored over an entire year. The results revealed that the LSF experimental test cell presented higher daily indoor air temperature fluctuations, leading to more extreme maximum and minimum values, closely following the outdoor dry bulb temperature variations. The more responsive behaviour was also reflected in the indoor thermal comfort analysis, with the LSF cell presenting slightly worse performance; however, some advantages were also observed regarding the LSF construction system, which could provide benefits during intermittent residential occupation, especially in mild climates, in which overheating is not a major concern.Eduardo RoqueRomeu VicenteRicardo M. S. F. AlmeidaMDPI AGarticlelight steel framingSouthern European climatemasonrythermal comfortthermal behaviourTechnologyTENEnergies, Vol 14, Iss 7025, p 7025 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
light steel framing Southern European climate masonry thermal comfort thermal behaviour Technology T |
spellingShingle |
light steel framing Southern European climate masonry thermal comfort thermal behaviour Technology T Eduardo Roque Romeu Vicente Ricardo M. S. F. Almeida Indoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context |
description |
Over the past decades, Southern European residential architecture has been typically associated with heavyweight hollow brick masonry and reinforced concrete construction systems; however, more industrialised alternative systems have been gaining a significant market share, such as the light steel framing (LSF). Regardless of the proliferation of LSF buildings, a lack of experimental research studies have been performed on this construction system in terms of the indoor thermal environment and thermal comfort in the Southern European climate context. Moreover, a research gap also exists regarding experimental comparisons with typical brick masonry buildings. The present study focused on this research gap by characterising and comparing the performance of these two construction systems. A long-term experimental campaign was carried out, involving the construction and monitoring of two identical test cells, differing only by construction system. The test cells were located in Portugal and were monitored over an entire year. The results revealed that the LSF experimental test cell presented higher daily indoor air temperature fluctuations, leading to more extreme maximum and minimum values, closely following the outdoor dry bulb temperature variations. The more responsive behaviour was also reflected in the indoor thermal comfort analysis, with the LSF cell presenting slightly worse performance; however, some advantages were also observed regarding the LSF construction system, which could provide benefits during intermittent residential occupation, especially in mild climates, in which overheating is not a major concern. |
format |
article |
author |
Eduardo Roque Romeu Vicente Ricardo M. S. F. Almeida |
author_facet |
Eduardo Roque Romeu Vicente Ricardo M. S. F. Almeida |
author_sort |
Eduardo Roque |
title |
Indoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context |
title_short |
Indoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context |
title_full |
Indoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context |
title_fullStr |
Indoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context |
title_full_unstemmed |
Indoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context |
title_sort |
indoor thermal environment challenges of light steel framing in the southern european context |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/56785e52f9134ad7a3c6cc604b2c6df2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT eduardoroque indoorthermalenvironmentchallengesoflightsteelframinginthesoutherneuropeancontext AT romeuvicente indoorthermalenvironmentchallengesoflightsteelframinginthesoutherneuropeancontext AT ricardomsfalmeida indoorthermalenvironmentchallengesoflightsteelframinginthesoutherneuropeancontext |
_version_ |
1718433571813720064 |