Indoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context

Over the past decades, Southern European residential architecture has been typically associated with heavyweight hollow brick masonry and reinforced concrete construction systems; however, more industrialised alternative systems have been gaining a significant market share, such as the light steel f...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eduardo Roque, Romeu Vicente, Ricardo M. S. F. Almeida
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/56785e52f9134ad7a3c6cc604b2c6df2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:56785e52f9134ad7a3c6cc604b2c6df2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:56785e52f9134ad7a3c6cc604b2c6df22021-11-11T15:50:40ZIndoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context10.3390/en142170251996-1073https://doaj.org/article/56785e52f9134ad7a3c6cc604b2c6df22021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7025https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073Over the past decades, Southern European residential architecture has been typically associated with heavyweight hollow brick masonry and reinforced concrete construction systems; however, more industrialised alternative systems have been gaining a significant market share, such as the light steel framing (LSF). Regardless of the proliferation of LSF buildings, a lack of experimental research studies have been performed on this construction system in terms of the indoor thermal environment and thermal comfort in the Southern European climate context. Moreover, a research gap also exists regarding experimental comparisons with typical brick masonry buildings. The present study focused on this research gap by characterising and comparing the performance of these two construction systems. A long-term experimental campaign was carried out, involving the construction and monitoring of two identical test cells, differing only by construction system. The test cells were located in Portugal and were monitored over an entire year. The results revealed that the LSF experimental test cell presented higher daily indoor air temperature fluctuations, leading to more extreme maximum and minimum values, closely following the outdoor dry bulb temperature variations. The more responsive behaviour was also reflected in the indoor thermal comfort analysis, with the LSF cell presenting slightly worse performance; however, some advantages were also observed regarding the LSF construction system, which could provide benefits during intermittent residential occupation, especially in mild climates, in which overheating is not a major concern.Eduardo RoqueRomeu VicenteRicardo M. S. F. AlmeidaMDPI AGarticlelight steel framingSouthern European climatemasonrythermal comfortthermal behaviourTechnologyTENEnergies, Vol 14, Iss 7025, p 7025 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic light steel framing
Southern European climate
masonry
thermal comfort
thermal behaviour
Technology
T
spellingShingle light steel framing
Southern European climate
masonry
thermal comfort
thermal behaviour
Technology
T
Eduardo Roque
Romeu Vicente
Ricardo M. S. F. Almeida
Indoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context
description Over the past decades, Southern European residential architecture has been typically associated with heavyweight hollow brick masonry and reinforced concrete construction systems; however, more industrialised alternative systems have been gaining a significant market share, such as the light steel framing (LSF). Regardless of the proliferation of LSF buildings, a lack of experimental research studies have been performed on this construction system in terms of the indoor thermal environment and thermal comfort in the Southern European climate context. Moreover, a research gap also exists regarding experimental comparisons with typical brick masonry buildings. The present study focused on this research gap by characterising and comparing the performance of these two construction systems. A long-term experimental campaign was carried out, involving the construction and monitoring of two identical test cells, differing only by construction system. The test cells were located in Portugal and were monitored over an entire year. The results revealed that the LSF experimental test cell presented higher daily indoor air temperature fluctuations, leading to more extreme maximum and minimum values, closely following the outdoor dry bulb temperature variations. The more responsive behaviour was also reflected in the indoor thermal comfort analysis, with the LSF cell presenting slightly worse performance; however, some advantages were also observed regarding the LSF construction system, which could provide benefits during intermittent residential occupation, especially in mild climates, in which overheating is not a major concern.
format article
author Eduardo Roque
Romeu Vicente
Ricardo M. S. F. Almeida
author_facet Eduardo Roque
Romeu Vicente
Ricardo M. S. F. Almeida
author_sort Eduardo Roque
title Indoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context
title_short Indoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context
title_full Indoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context
title_fullStr Indoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context
title_full_unstemmed Indoor Thermal Environment Challenges of Light Steel Framing in the Southern European Context
title_sort indoor thermal environment challenges of light steel framing in the southern european context
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/56785e52f9134ad7a3c6cc604b2c6df2
work_keys_str_mv AT eduardoroque indoorthermalenvironmentchallengesoflightsteelframinginthesoutherneuropeancontext
AT romeuvicente indoorthermalenvironmentchallengesoflightsteelframinginthesoutherneuropeancontext
AT ricardomsfalmeida indoorthermalenvironmentchallengesoflightsteelframinginthesoutherneuropeancontext
_version_ 1718433571813720064