Framing agricultural policy through the EC’s strategies on CAP reforms (1992–2017)

Abstract The periodic reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) are announced each time by a strategic document in the form of a Communication by the European Commission (EC). The content of the last Communication differs from previous ones, which raises the questions of what frames the EC has...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karmen Erjavec, Emil Erjavec
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: SpringerOpen 2021
Materias:
CAP
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/56b6a96a23354fd987eb991101477a92
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:56b6a96a23354fd987eb991101477a92
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:56b6a96a23354fd987eb991101477a922021-11-08T10:44:28ZFraming agricultural policy through the EC’s strategies on CAP reforms (1992–2017)10.1186/s40100-021-00178-42193-7532https://doaj.org/article/56b6a96a23354fd987eb991101477a922021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-021-00178-4https://doaj.org/toc/2193-7532Abstract The periodic reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) are announced each time by a strategic document in the form of a Communication by the European Commission (EC). The content of the last Communication differs from previous ones, which raises the questions of what frames the EC has employed with respect to its CAP reforms and how these frames have been modified over the past 26 years (from 1991 to 2017) in order to legitimise the preservation of the CAP. This paper tries to fill the gap in the research of frames in the main strategic documents on the CAP by employing comparative historical framing analysis. The results show consistent use of five frames: the policy mechanism frame, farmers’ economic frame, foreign trade frame, budgetary frame, and the societal concerns frame. While they have all remained in use, most have been changed significantly over the years. Throughout the analysed period, the farmers’ economic frame has retained its primacy and continuity, demonstrating the power of the farmers’ lobbies and conservative member states. If in the initial Communications the environment was barely present within the societal concerns frame, it has gained importance in the recent Communications, in addition to other general societal issues, such as climate change, food security and quality, health, digitalisation, innovation, and even migration. By marginalising the policy mechanism frame and replacing it with the implementation model and increasingly emphasising the societal concerns frame with social justifications of the CAP, the EC is trying to legitimise the CAP after 2021.Karmen ErjavecEmil ErjavecSpringerOpenarticleCAPEuropean UnionEuropean CommissionCommunicationNutrition. Foods and food supplyTX341-641Agricultural industriesHD9000-9495ENAgricultural and Food Economics, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-18 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic CAP
European Union
European Commission
Communication
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
Agricultural industries
HD9000-9495
spellingShingle CAP
European Union
European Commission
Communication
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
Agricultural industries
HD9000-9495
Karmen Erjavec
Emil Erjavec
Framing agricultural policy through the EC’s strategies on CAP reforms (1992–2017)
description Abstract The periodic reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) are announced each time by a strategic document in the form of a Communication by the European Commission (EC). The content of the last Communication differs from previous ones, which raises the questions of what frames the EC has employed with respect to its CAP reforms and how these frames have been modified over the past 26 years (from 1991 to 2017) in order to legitimise the preservation of the CAP. This paper tries to fill the gap in the research of frames in the main strategic documents on the CAP by employing comparative historical framing analysis. The results show consistent use of five frames: the policy mechanism frame, farmers’ economic frame, foreign trade frame, budgetary frame, and the societal concerns frame. While they have all remained in use, most have been changed significantly over the years. Throughout the analysed period, the farmers’ economic frame has retained its primacy and continuity, demonstrating the power of the farmers’ lobbies and conservative member states. If in the initial Communications the environment was barely present within the societal concerns frame, it has gained importance in the recent Communications, in addition to other general societal issues, such as climate change, food security and quality, health, digitalisation, innovation, and even migration. By marginalising the policy mechanism frame and replacing it with the implementation model and increasingly emphasising the societal concerns frame with social justifications of the CAP, the EC is trying to legitimise the CAP after 2021.
format article
author Karmen Erjavec
Emil Erjavec
author_facet Karmen Erjavec
Emil Erjavec
author_sort Karmen Erjavec
title Framing agricultural policy through the EC’s strategies on CAP reforms (1992–2017)
title_short Framing agricultural policy through the EC’s strategies on CAP reforms (1992–2017)
title_full Framing agricultural policy through the EC’s strategies on CAP reforms (1992–2017)
title_fullStr Framing agricultural policy through the EC’s strategies on CAP reforms (1992–2017)
title_full_unstemmed Framing agricultural policy through the EC’s strategies on CAP reforms (1992–2017)
title_sort framing agricultural policy through the ec’s strategies on cap reforms (1992–2017)
publisher SpringerOpen
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/56b6a96a23354fd987eb991101477a92
work_keys_str_mv AT karmenerjavec framingagriculturalpolicythroughtheecsstrategiesoncapreforms19922017
AT emilerjavec framingagriculturalpolicythroughtheecsstrategiesoncapreforms19922017
_version_ 1718442617432178688