Automated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions
This article critically examines the opportunities and challenges that automated decision-making (ADM) poses for environmental impact assessments (EIAs) as a crucial aspect of environmental law. It argues that while fully or partially automating discretionary EIA decisions is legally and technically...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Queensland University of Technology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/56cd44c6afe34491be12e55303375b8a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:56cd44c6afe34491be12e55303375b8a |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:56cd44c6afe34491be12e55303375b8a2021-11-08T01:48:43ZAutomated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions2652-407410.5204/lthj.1846https://doaj.org/article/56cd44c6afe34491be12e55303375b8a2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://lthj.qut.edu.au/article/view/1846https://doaj.org/toc/2652-4074This article critically examines the opportunities and challenges that automated decision-making (ADM) poses for environmental impact assessments (EIAs) as a crucial aspect of environmental law. It argues that while fully or partially automating discretionary EIA decisions is legally and technically problematic, there is significant potential for data-driven decision-making tools to provide superior analysis and predictions to better inform EIA processes. Discretionary decision-making is desirable for EIA decisions given the inherent complexity associated with environmental regulation and the prediction of future impacts. This article demonstrates that current ADM tools cannot adequately replicate human discretionary processes for EIAs—even if there is human oversight and review of automated outputs. Instead of fully or partially automating EIA decisions, data-driven decision-making can be more appropriately deployed to enhance data analysis and predictions to optimise EIA decision-making processes. This latter type of ADM can augment decision-making processes without displacing the critical role of human discretion in weighing the complex environmental, social and economic considerations inherent in EIA determinations.Zoe NayAnna HugginsFelicity DeaneQueensland University of Technologyarticleenvironmental impact assessmentsautomated decision-makingdiscretionary decisionsdata-driven decision-makingLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. JurisprudenceK1-7720ENLaw, Technology and Humans, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 76-90 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
environmental impact assessments automated decision-making discretionary decisions data-driven decision-making Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720 |
spellingShingle |
environmental impact assessments automated decision-making discretionary decisions data-driven decision-making Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720 Zoe Nay Anna Huggins Felicity Deane Automated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions |
description |
This article critically examines the opportunities and challenges that automated decision-making (ADM) poses for environmental impact assessments (EIAs) as a crucial aspect of environmental law. It argues that while fully or partially automating discretionary EIA decisions is legally and technically problematic, there is significant potential for data-driven decision-making tools to provide superior analysis and predictions to better inform EIA processes. Discretionary decision-making is desirable for EIA decisions given the inherent complexity associated with environmental regulation and the prediction of future impacts. This article demonstrates that current ADM tools cannot adequately replicate human discretionary processes for EIAs—even if there is human oversight and review of automated outputs. Instead of fully or partially automating EIA decisions, data-driven decision-making can be more appropriately deployed to enhance data analysis and predictions to optimise EIA decision-making processes. This latter type of ADM can augment decision-making processes without displacing the critical role of human discretion in weighing the complex environmental, social and economic considerations inherent in EIA determinations. |
format |
article |
author |
Zoe Nay Anna Huggins Felicity Deane |
author_facet |
Zoe Nay Anna Huggins Felicity Deane |
author_sort |
Zoe Nay |
title |
Automated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions |
title_short |
Automated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions |
title_full |
Automated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions |
title_fullStr |
Automated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Automated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions |
title_sort |
automated decision-making and environmental impact assessments: decisions, data analysis and predictions |
publisher |
Queensland University of Technology |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/56cd44c6afe34491be12e55303375b8a |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zoenay automateddecisionmakingandenvironmentalimpactassessmentsdecisionsdataanalysisandpredictions AT annahuggins automateddecisionmakingandenvironmentalimpactassessmentsdecisionsdataanalysisandpredictions AT felicitydeane automateddecisionmakingandenvironmentalimpactassessmentsdecisionsdataanalysisandpredictions |
_version_ |
1718443284136722432 |