Automated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions

This article critically examines the opportunities and challenges that automated decision-making (ADM) poses for environmental impact assessments (EIAs) as a crucial aspect of environmental law. It argues that while fully or partially automating discretionary EIA decisions is legally and technically...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zoe Nay, Anna Huggins, Felicity Deane
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Queensland University of Technology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/56cd44c6afe34491be12e55303375b8a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:56cd44c6afe34491be12e55303375b8a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:56cd44c6afe34491be12e55303375b8a2021-11-08T01:48:43ZAutomated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions2652-407410.5204/lthj.1846https://doaj.org/article/56cd44c6afe34491be12e55303375b8a2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://lthj.qut.edu.au/article/view/1846https://doaj.org/toc/2652-4074This article critically examines the opportunities and challenges that automated decision-making (ADM) poses for environmental impact assessments (EIAs) as a crucial aspect of environmental law. It argues that while fully or partially automating discretionary EIA decisions is legally and technically problematic, there is significant potential for data-driven decision-making tools to provide superior analysis and predictions to better inform EIA processes. Discretionary decision-making is desirable for EIA decisions given the inherent complexity associated with environmental regulation and the prediction of future impacts. This article demonstrates that current ADM tools cannot adequately replicate human discretionary processes for EIAs—even if there is human oversight and review of automated outputs. Instead of fully or partially automating EIA decisions, data-driven decision-making can be more appropriately deployed to enhance data analysis and predictions to optimise EIA decision-making processes. This latter type of ADM can augment decision-making processes without displacing the critical role of human discretion in weighing the complex environmental, social and economic considerations inherent in EIA determinations.Zoe NayAnna HugginsFelicity DeaneQueensland University of Technologyarticleenvironmental impact assessmentsautomated decision-makingdiscretionary decisionsdata-driven decision-makingLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. JurisprudenceK1-7720ENLaw, Technology and Humans, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 76-90 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic environmental impact assessments
automated decision-making
discretionary decisions
data-driven decision-making
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
spellingShingle environmental impact assessments
automated decision-making
discretionary decisions
data-driven decision-making
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Zoe Nay
Anna Huggins
Felicity Deane
Automated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions
description This article critically examines the opportunities and challenges that automated decision-making (ADM) poses for environmental impact assessments (EIAs) as a crucial aspect of environmental law. It argues that while fully or partially automating discretionary EIA decisions is legally and technically problematic, there is significant potential for data-driven decision-making tools to provide superior analysis and predictions to better inform EIA processes. Discretionary decision-making is desirable for EIA decisions given the inherent complexity associated with environmental regulation and the prediction of future impacts. This article demonstrates that current ADM tools cannot adequately replicate human discretionary processes for EIAs—even if there is human oversight and review of automated outputs. Instead of fully or partially automating EIA decisions, data-driven decision-making can be more appropriately deployed to enhance data analysis and predictions to optimise EIA decision-making processes. This latter type of ADM can augment decision-making processes without displacing the critical role of human discretion in weighing the complex environmental, social and economic considerations inherent in EIA determinations.
format article
author Zoe Nay
Anna Huggins
Felicity Deane
author_facet Zoe Nay
Anna Huggins
Felicity Deane
author_sort Zoe Nay
title Automated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions
title_short Automated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions
title_full Automated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions
title_fullStr Automated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions
title_full_unstemmed Automated Decision-Making and Environmental Impact Assessments: Decisions, Data Analysis and Predictions
title_sort automated decision-making and environmental impact assessments: decisions, data analysis and predictions
publisher Queensland University of Technology
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/56cd44c6afe34491be12e55303375b8a
work_keys_str_mv AT zoenay automateddecisionmakingandenvironmentalimpactassessmentsdecisionsdataanalysisandpredictions
AT annahuggins automateddecisionmakingandenvironmentalimpactassessmentsdecisionsdataanalysisandpredictions
AT felicitydeane automateddecisionmakingandenvironmentalimpactassessmentsdecisionsdataanalysisandpredictions
_version_ 1718443284136722432