Comparison of Curative Complications between Mammotome-Assisted Minimally Invasive Resection and Conventional Open Resection for Breast Neoplasm: A Retrospective Clinical Study
Background. To know the clinical value of mammotome-assisted minimally invasive resection (MAMIR) in the treatment of patients with breast neoplasm, we performed a retrospective clinical study for the patients treated with the MAMIR and conventional open resection (COR). Methods. Postoperative compl...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Language: | EN |
| Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/56d3433b8e8b4f5ba93269dabccdf50e |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background. To know the clinical value of mammotome-assisted minimally invasive resection (MAMIR) in the treatment of patients with breast neoplasm, we performed a retrospective clinical study for the patients treated with the MAMIR and conventional open resection (COR). Methods. Postoperative complications were compared between 40 patients treated with the MAMIR and 40 patients treated with the COR. The postoperative complications mainly included intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization days, operative time, surgical scar, and incidence of postoperative complications. Results. We found that the amount of intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization days, operative time, surgical scar, and incidence of postoperative complications in the MAMIR group were significantly lower than those of patients in the COR group. Conclusion. Our results indicated that patients with breast neoplasm treated with the MAMIR had better outcomes, which reinforced the advantage of this approach. |
|---|