The Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf

Verbs in Bondei, a Bantu language spoken in East Africa, have crossreferencing pronouns which agree in noun class with the subject and object of the clause. This paper will examine the distribution of the syntactic category object pronoun in four grammatical constructions: (a) basic affirmative decl...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Elizabeth G. Weber
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
Publicado: LibraryPress@UF 1988
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/570e0c31bd874852948575a3d1b95d36
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:570e0c31bd874852948575a3d1b95d36
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:570e0c31bd874852948575a3d1b95d362021-11-19T03:54:48ZThe Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf10.32473/sal.v19i2.1074640039-35332154-428Xhttps://doaj.org/article/570e0c31bd874852948575a3d1b95d361988-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.flvc.org/sal/article/view/107464https://doaj.org/toc/0039-3533https://doaj.org/toc/2154-428XVerbs in Bondei, a Bantu language spoken in East Africa, have crossreferencing pronouns which agree in noun class with the subject and object of the clause. This paper will examine the distribution of the syntactic category object pronoun in four grammatical constructions: (a) basic affirmative declarative clauses; (b) relative clauses; (c) clefts; and (d) pseudo-clefts. In declarative and relative clauses, the presence of the object pronoun does not require a definite interpretation of the object noun; the absence of the object pronoun does not preclude a definite interpretation of the object noun. In both cleft and pseudo-cleft constructions, however, the object pronoun obligatorily functions to grammatically mark clef ted and pseudo-clef ted objects as definite. In the cleft constructions, the definiteness of the clef ted NP forces a contrastive interpretation. Thus, a judgement concerning the function of this grammatical construction with regard to contrastive function will be made on the basis of the distribution of the syntactic category object pronoun. possible to make the same judgment. Contrastive function is unambiguously signaled by the relative morphology on the verb of the pseudo-cleft. In this constuction, the object pronoun serves only to force a definite interpretation of the NP. In the pseudo-cleft constructions, it is not possible to make the same judgment. Contrastive function is unambiguously signaled by the relative morphology on the verb of the pseudo-cleft. In this constuction, the object pronoun serves only to force a definite interpretation of the NP.Elizabeth G. WeberLibraryPress@UFarticleBondeiBantupronounsnoun classrelative clausescleftPhilology. LinguisticsP1-1091ENFRStudies in African Linguistics, Vol 19, Iss 2 (1988)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
topic Bondei
Bantu
pronouns
noun class
relative clauses
cleft
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
spellingShingle Bondei
Bantu
pronouns
noun class
relative clauses
cleft
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Elizabeth G. Weber
The Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf
description Verbs in Bondei, a Bantu language spoken in East Africa, have crossreferencing pronouns which agree in noun class with the subject and object of the clause. This paper will examine the distribution of the syntactic category object pronoun in four grammatical constructions: (a) basic affirmative declarative clauses; (b) relative clauses; (c) clefts; and (d) pseudo-clefts. In declarative and relative clauses, the presence of the object pronoun does not require a definite interpretation of the object noun; the absence of the object pronoun does not preclude a definite interpretation of the object noun. In both cleft and pseudo-cleft constructions, however, the object pronoun obligatorily functions to grammatically mark clef ted and pseudo-clef ted objects as definite. In the cleft constructions, the definiteness of the clef ted NP forces a contrastive interpretation. Thus, a judgement concerning the function of this grammatical construction with regard to contrastive function will be made on the basis of the distribution of the syntactic category object pronoun. possible to make the same judgment. Contrastive function is unambiguously signaled by the relative morphology on the verb of the pseudo-cleft. In this constuction, the object pronoun serves only to force a definite interpretation of the NP. In the pseudo-cleft constructions, it is not possible to make the same judgment. Contrastive function is unambiguously signaled by the relative morphology on the verb of the pseudo-cleft. In this constuction, the object pronoun serves only to force a definite interpretation of the NP.
format article
author Elizabeth G. Weber
author_facet Elizabeth G. Weber
author_sort Elizabeth G. Weber
title The Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf
title_short The Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf
title_full The Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf
title_fullStr The Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf
title_full_unstemmed The Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf
title_sort bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf
publisher LibraryPress@UF
publishDate 1988
url https://doaj.org/article/570e0c31bd874852948575a3d1b95d36
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethgweber thebondeiobjectpronounincleftsandpseudocleftspdf
AT elizabethgweber bondeiobjectpronounincleftsandpseudocleftspdf
_version_ 1718420552785330176