Transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Principles and technique

Objective: The present study is a review of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). Methods: The review presents the experience of the robotic center that developed the technique with regards to patient selection, surgical method, and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claudio Vicini, Filippo Montevecchi, Riccardo Gobbi, Andrea De Vito, Giuseppe Meccariello
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/575bc8a13ec74ac3be5c84237abce308
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:575bc8a13ec74ac3be5c84237abce308
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:575bc8a13ec74ac3be5c84237abce3082021-12-02T11:49:47ZTransoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Principles and technique2095-881110.1016/j.wjorl.2017.05.003https://doaj.org/article/575bc8a13ec74ac3be5c84237abce3082017-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095881117300501https://doaj.org/toc/2095-8811Objective: The present study is a review of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). Methods: The review presents the experience of the robotic center that developed the technique with regards to patient selection, surgical method, and post-operative care. In addition, the review provides results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the complications and clinical outcomes of TORS when applied in the management of OSAHS. Results: The rate of success, defined as 50% reduction of pre-operative AHI and an overall AHI <20 events/h, is achieved in up to 76.6% of patients with a range between 53.8% and 83.3%. The safety of this approach is reasonable as the main complication (bleeding) affected 4.2% of patients (range 4.2%â5.3%). However, transient dysphagia (7.2%; range 5%â14%) does compromise the quality of life and must be discussed with patients preoperatively. Conclusions: TORS for the treatment of OSAHS appears to be a promising and safe procedure for patients seeking an alternative to traditional therapy. Appropriate patient selection remains an important consideration for successful implementation of this novel surgical approach requiring further research. Keywords: Transoral robotic surgery, TORS, Partial glossectomy, Midline glossectomy, Posterior glossectomy, Obstructive sleep apnea, Sleep surgeryClaudio ViciniFilippo MontevecchiRiccardo GobbiAndrea De VitoGiuseppe MeccarielloKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.articleOtorhinolaryngologyRF1-547SurgeryRD1-811ENWorld Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 97-100 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Otorhinolaryngology
RF1-547
Surgery
RD1-811
spellingShingle Otorhinolaryngology
RF1-547
Surgery
RD1-811
Claudio Vicini
Filippo Montevecchi
Riccardo Gobbi
Andrea De Vito
Giuseppe Meccariello
Transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Principles and technique
description Objective: The present study is a review of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). Methods: The review presents the experience of the robotic center that developed the technique with regards to patient selection, surgical method, and post-operative care. In addition, the review provides results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the complications and clinical outcomes of TORS when applied in the management of OSAHS. Results: The rate of success, defined as 50% reduction of pre-operative AHI and an overall AHI <20 events/h, is achieved in up to 76.6% of patients with a range between 53.8% and 83.3%. The safety of this approach is reasonable as the main complication (bleeding) affected 4.2% of patients (range 4.2%â5.3%). However, transient dysphagia (7.2%; range 5%â14%) does compromise the quality of life and must be discussed with patients preoperatively. Conclusions: TORS for the treatment of OSAHS appears to be a promising and safe procedure for patients seeking an alternative to traditional therapy. Appropriate patient selection remains an important consideration for successful implementation of this novel surgical approach requiring further research. Keywords: Transoral robotic surgery, TORS, Partial glossectomy, Midline glossectomy, Posterior glossectomy, Obstructive sleep apnea, Sleep surgery
format article
author Claudio Vicini
Filippo Montevecchi
Riccardo Gobbi
Andrea De Vito
Giuseppe Meccariello
author_facet Claudio Vicini
Filippo Montevecchi
Riccardo Gobbi
Andrea De Vito
Giuseppe Meccariello
author_sort Claudio Vicini
title Transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Principles and technique
title_short Transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Principles and technique
title_full Transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Principles and technique
title_fullStr Transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Principles and technique
title_full_unstemmed Transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Principles and technique
title_sort transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: principles and technique
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/575bc8a13ec74ac3be5c84237abce308
work_keys_str_mv AT claudiovicini transoralroboticsurgeryforobstructivesleepapneasyndromeprinciplesandtechnique
AT filippomontevecchi transoralroboticsurgeryforobstructivesleepapneasyndromeprinciplesandtechnique
AT riccardogobbi transoralroboticsurgeryforobstructivesleepapneasyndromeprinciplesandtechnique
AT andreadevito transoralroboticsurgeryforobstructivesleepapneasyndromeprinciplesandtechnique
AT giuseppemeccariello transoralroboticsurgeryforobstructivesleepapneasyndromeprinciplesandtechnique
_version_ 1718395164142075904