Paradigmatic Discord in US Arctic Policy

The United States, as one of the five Arctic states, plays what seems at first glance a typical role in the Arctic through their regional policy that uses standard tactical maneuvers, which have proven themselves worthy in other areas of the globe. However, this role is played with unusual passivene...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	L. A. Matiyak
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	MGIMO University Press 2015
Materias:	the arctic foreign policy of the usa arctic council international legal status united nations convention on the law of the sea northwest passage canada greenland icebreaker fleet the north arctic identity International relations JZ2-6530
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/57734956dce041409c86f8bd850c4ae8
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:57734956dce041409c86f8bd850c4ae8
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:57734956dce041409c86f8bd850c4ae82021-11-23T14:50:59ZParadigmatic Discord in US Arctic Policy2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2015-2-41-108-119https://doaj.org/article/57734956dce041409c86f8bd850c4ae82015-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/317https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099The United States, as one of the five Arctic states, plays what seems at first glance a typical role in the Arctic through their regional policy that uses standard tactical maneuvers, which have proven themselves worthy in other areas of the globe. However, this role is played with unusual passiveness that can be attributed primarily to a lack of an Arctic identity. This is most evident upon comparison with other states of the Arctic "five", which are completely different from each other, and nevertheless are bound by a sense of belonging to the North. The Unites States is the only Arctic state that has not signed the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, that has taken a firm stance on the sovereignty of the Northwest Passage, that risks increasing tensions with Canada, and that is not developing its icebreaker fleet, which is crucial to operations in the Arctic. This circumpolar strategic ambivalence of a powerful state, that is experienced in conducting foreign affairs, in itself presents significant room for research. Meanwhile, the region's importance is increasing in the changing international environment; it can become a "battlefield" due its strategic geopolitical position and at the same time the "main trophy"due to its abundant hydrocarbon potential. During the recent years, the Arctic has been gradually transforming into a "metaregion" for foreign affairs; its geographically limited borders have spread globally due to an increasing international presence in the Polar Region that has significant energy resources and transportation potential. This is confirmed by the emergence of new actors (including traditionally non-Arctic players), the change in agenda of multilateral discussions (traditional topics, such as protection of the fragile Arctic environment, indigenous peoples of the North, have been complemented with the new "challenges" of energy security, global warming, and militarization), and the strengthening of the institutional framework (the Arctic Council has been more and more influential). In light of the recent tension in Russian-US relations and the rising significance of the Polar Region, US Arctic policy should be the subject of an in-depth analysis of foreign-affairs experts and the government.L. A. MatiyakMGIMO University Pressarticlethe arcticforeign policy of the usaarctic councilinternational legal statusunited nations convention on the law of the seanorthwest passagecanadagreenlandicebreaker fleetthe northarctic identityInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 2(41), Pp 108-119 (2015)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	the arctic foreign policy of the usa arctic council international legal status united nations convention on the law of the sea northwest passage canada greenland icebreaker fleet the north arctic identity International relations JZ2-6530
spellingShingle	the arctic foreign policy of the usa arctic council international legal status united nations convention on the law of the sea northwest passage canada greenland icebreaker fleet the north arctic identity International relations JZ2-6530 L. A. Matiyak Paradigmatic Discord in US Arctic Policy
description	The United States, as one of the five Arctic states, plays what seems at first glance a typical role in the Arctic through their regional policy that uses standard tactical maneuvers, which have proven themselves worthy in other areas of the globe. However, this role is played with unusual passiveness that can be attributed primarily to a lack of an Arctic identity. This is most evident upon comparison with other states of the Arctic "five", which are completely different from each other, and nevertheless are bound by a sense of belonging to the North. The Unites States is the only Arctic state that has not signed the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, that has taken a firm stance on the sovereignty of the Northwest Passage, that risks increasing tensions with Canada, and that is not developing its icebreaker fleet, which is crucial to operations in the Arctic. This circumpolar strategic ambivalence of a powerful state, that is experienced in conducting foreign affairs, in itself presents significant room for research. Meanwhile, the region's importance is increasing in the changing international environment; it can become a "battlefield" due its strategic geopolitical position and at the same time the "main trophy"due to its abundant hydrocarbon potential. During the recent years, the Arctic has been gradually transforming into a "metaregion" for foreign affairs; its geographically limited borders have spread globally due to an increasing international presence in the Polar Region that has significant energy resources and transportation potential. This is confirmed by the emergence of new actors (including traditionally non-Arctic players), the change in agenda of multilateral discussions (traditional topics, such as protection of the fragile Arctic environment, indigenous peoples of the North, have been complemented with the new "challenges" of energy security, global warming, and militarization), and the strengthening of the institutional framework (the Arctic Council has been more and more influential). In light of the recent tension in Russian-US relations and the rising significance of the Polar Region, US Arctic policy should be the subject of an in-depth analysis of foreign-affairs experts and the government.
format	article
author	L. A. Matiyak
author_facet	L. A. Matiyak
author_sort	L. A. Matiyak
title	Paradigmatic Discord in US Arctic Policy
title_short	Paradigmatic Discord in US Arctic Policy
title_full	Paradigmatic Discord in US Arctic Policy
title_fullStr	Paradigmatic Discord in US Arctic Policy
title_full_unstemmed	Paradigmatic Discord in US Arctic Policy
title_sort	paradigmatic discord in us arctic policy
publisher	MGIMO University Press
publishDate	2015
url	https://doaj.org/article/57734956dce041409c86f8bd850c4ae8
work_keys_str_mv	AT lamatiyak paradigmaticdiscordinusarcticpolicy
_version_	1718416279422894080

Paradigmatic Discord in US Arctic Policy

Ejemplares similares