Estimating the cost of type 1 diabetes in the U.S.: a propensity score matching method.
<h4>Background</h4>Diabetes costs represent a large burden to both patients and the health care system. However, few studies that examine the economic consequences of diabetes have distinguished between the two major forms, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, despite differences in underlying pa...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/57aec89f168b48408ed6aeadd088181d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:57aec89f168b48408ed6aeadd088181d |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:57aec89f168b48408ed6aeadd088181d2021-12-02T20:20:11ZEstimating the cost of type 1 diabetes in the U.S.: a propensity score matching method.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0011501https://doaj.org/article/57aec89f168b48408ed6aeadd088181d2010-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20634976/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Diabetes costs represent a large burden to both patients and the health care system. However, few studies that examine the economic consequences of diabetes have distinguished between the two major forms, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, despite differences in underlying pathologies. Combining the two diseases implies that there is no difference between the costs of type 1 and type 2 diabetes to a patient. In this study, we examine the costs of type 1 diabetes, which is often overlooked due to the larger population of type 2 patients, and compare them to the estimated costs of diabetes reported in the literature.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Using a nationally representative dataset, we estimate yearly and lifetime medical and indirect costs of type 1 diabetes by implementing a matching method to compare a patient with type 1 diabetes to a similar individual without the disease. We find that each year type 1 diabetes costs this country $14.4 billion (11.5-17.3) in medical costs and lost income. In terms of lost income, type 1 patients incur a disproportionate share of type 1 and type 2 costs. Further, if the disease were eliminated by therapeutic intervention, an estimated $10.6 billion (7.2-14.0) incurred by a new cohort and $422.9 billion (327.2-519.4) incurred by the existing number of type 1 diabetic patients over their lifetime would be avoided.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>We find that the costs attributed to type 1 diabetes are disproportionately higher than the number of type 1 patients compared with type 2 patients, suggesting that combining the two diseases when estimating costs is not appropriate. This study and another recent contribution provides a necessary first step in estimating the substantial costs of type 1 diabetes on the U.S.Betty TaoMassimo PietropaoloMark AtkinsonDesmond SchatzDavid TaylorPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 5, Iss 7, p e11501 (2010) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Betty Tao Massimo Pietropaolo Mark Atkinson Desmond Schatz David Taylor Estimating the cost of type 1 diabetes in the U.S.: a propensity score matching method. |
description |
<h4>Background</h4>Diabetes costs represent a large burden to both patients and the health care system. However, few studies that examine the economic consequences of diabetes have distinguished between the two major forms, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, despite differences in underlying pathologies. Combining the two diseases implies that there is no difference between the costs of type 1 and type 2 diabetes to a patient. In this study, we examine the costs of type 1 diabetes, which is often overlooked due to the larger population of type 2 patients, and compare them to the estimated costs of diabetes reported in the literature.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Using a nationally representative dataset, we estimate yearly and lifetime medical and indirect costs of type 1 diabetes by implementing a matching method to compare a patient with type 1 diabetes to a similar individual without the disease. We find that each year type 1 diabetes costs this country $14.4 billion (11.5-17.3) in medical costs and lost income. In terms of lost income, type 1 patients incur a disproportionate share of type 1 and type 2 costs. Further, if the disease were eliminated by therapeutic intervention, an estimated $10.6 billion (7.2-14.0) incurred by a new cohort and $422.9 billion (327.2-519.4) incurred by the existing number of type 1 diabetic patients over their lifetime would be avoided.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>We find that the costs attributed to type 1 diabetes are disproportionately higher than the number of type 1 patients compared with type 2 patients, suggesting that combining the two diseases when estimating costs is not appropriate. This study and another recent contribution provides a necessary first step in estimating the substantial costs of type 1 diabetes on the U.S. |
format |
article |
author |
Betty Tao Massimo Pietropaolo Mark Atkinson Desmond Schatz David Taylor |
author_facet |
Betty Tao Massimo Pietropaolo Mark Atkinson Desmond Schatz David Taylor |
author_sort |
Betty Tao |
title |
Estimating the cost of type 1 diabetes in the U.S.: a propensity score matching method. |
title_short |
Estimating the cost of type 1 diabetes in the U.S.: a propensity score matching method. |
title_full |
Estimating the cost of type 1 diabetes in the U.S.: a propensity score matching method. |
title_fullStr |
Estimating the cost of type 1 diabetes in the U.S.: a propensity score matching method. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Estimating the cost of type 1 diabetes in the U.S.: a propensity score matching method. |
title_sort |
estimating the cost of type 1 diabetes in the u.s.: a propensity score matching method. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/57aec89f168b48408ed6aeadd088181d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bettytao estimatingthecostoftype1diabetesintheusapropensityscorematchingmethod AT massimopietropaolo estimatingthecostoftype1diabetesintheusapropensityscorematchingmethod AT markatkinson estimatingthecostoftype1diabetesintheusapropensityscorematchingmethod AT desmondschatz estimatingthecostoftype1diabetesintheusapropensityscorematchingmethod AT davidtaylor estimatingthecostoftype1diabetesintheusapropensityscorematchingmethod |
_version_ |
1718374165610758144 |