Assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial
Abstract Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are an important global issue, leading to poor patient outcomes. A potential route of transmission of HAIs is through contact with hospital privacy curtains. The aim of this study is to evaluate cleaning on reduction of curtain bacterial burden. In th...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/57bc9586614c4b3fba7b9e8ba0430f3b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:57bc9586614c4b3fba7b9e8ba0430f3b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:57bc9586614c4b3fba7b9e8ba0430f3b2021-11-14T12:17:23ZAssessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial10.1038/s41598-021-01198-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/57bc9586614c4b3fba7b9e8ba0430f3b2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01198-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are an important global issue, leading to poor patient outcomes. A potential route of transmission of HAIs is through contact with hospital privacy curtains. The aim of this study is to evaluate cleaning on reduction of curtain bacterial burden. In this pilot cluster randomized controlled trial we compared the bacterial burden between three groups of 24 curtains on a regional burn/plastic surgery ward. A control group was not cleaned. Two groups were cleaned at 3–4 day intervals with either disinfectant spray or wipe. The primary outcome was the difference in mean CFU/cm2 between day 0 to day 21. The secondary outcome was the proportion of curtains contaminated with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). By day 21, the control group was statistically higher (2.2 CFU/cm2) than spray (1.3 CFU/cm2) or wipe (1.5 CFU/cm2) (p < 0.05). After each cleaning at 3–4 day intervals, the bacterial burden on the curtains reduced to near day 0 levels; however, the level increased again over the intervening 3–4 days. By day 21, 64% of control curtains were contaminated with MRSA compared to 10% (spray) and 5% (wipe) (p < 0.05). This study show that curtains start clean and progressively become contaminated with bacteria. Regularly cleaning curtains with disinfectant spray or wipes reduces bacterial burden and MRSA contamination.Kianna CadoganSabrin BasharSaul MagnussonRakesh PatidarJohn EmbilJustin P. GawaziukMonika GawthropSong LiuAyush KumarSarvesh LogsettyNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Kianna Cadogan Sabrin Bashar Saul Magnusson Rakesh Patidar John Embil Justin P. Gawaziuk Monika Gawthrop Song Liu Ayush Kumar Sarvesh Logsetty Assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial |
description |
Abstract Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are an important global issue, leading to poor patient outcomes. A potential route of transmission of HAIs is through contact with hospital privacy curtains. The aim of this study is to evaluate cleaning on reduction of curtain bacterial burden. In this pilot cluster randomized controlled trial we compared the bacterial burden between three groups of 24 curtains on a regional burn/plastic surgery ward. A control group was not cleaned. Two groups were cleaned at 3–4 day intervals with either disinfectant spray or wipe. The primary outcome was the difference in mean CFU/cm2 between day 0 to day 21. The secondary outcome was the proportion of curtains contaminated with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). By day 21, the control group was statistically higher (2.2 CFU/cm2) than spray (1.3 CFU/cm2) or wipe (1.5 CFU/cm2) (p < 0.05). After each cleaning at 3–4 day intervals, the bacterial burden on the curtains reduced to near day 0 levels; however, the level increased again over the intervening 3–4 days. By day 21, 64% of control curtains were contaminated with MRSA compared to 10% (spray) and 5% (wipe) (p < 0.05). This study show that curtains start clean and progressively become contaminated with bacteria. Regularly cleaning curtains with disinfectant spray or wipes reduces bacterial burden and MRSA contamination. |
format |
article |
author |
Kianna Cadogan Sabrin Bashar Saul Magnusson Rakesh Patidar John Embil Justin P. Gawaziuk Monika Gawthrop Song Liu Ayush Kumar Sarvesh Logsetty |
author_facet |
Kianna Cadogan Sabrin Bashar Saul Magnusson Rakesh Patidar John Embil Justin P. Gawaziuk Monika Gawthrop Song Liu Ayush Kumar Sarvesh Logsetty |
author_sort |
Kianna Cadogan |
title |
Assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title_short |
Assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title_full |
Assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title_sort |
assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/57bc9586614c4b3fba7b9e8ba0430f3b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kiannacadogan assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sabrinbashar assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT saulmagnusson assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rakeshpatidar assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT johnembil assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT justinpgawaziuk assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT monikagawthrop assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT songliu assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ayushkumar assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sarveshlogsetty assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1718429288079818752 |