Assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Abstract Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are an important global issue, leading to poor patient outcomes. A potential route of transmission of HAIs is through contact with hospital privacy curtains. The aim of this study is to evaluate cleaning on reduction of curtain bacterial burden. In th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kianna Cadogan, Sabrin Bashar, Saul Magnusson, Rakesh Patidar, John Embil, Justin P. Gawaziuk, Monika Gawthrop, Song Liu, Ayush Kumar, Sarvesh Logsetty
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/57bc9586614c4b3fba7b9e8ba0430f3b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:57bc9586614c4b3fba7b9e8ba0430f3b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:57bc9586614c4b3fba7b9e8ba0430f3b2021-11-14T12:17:23ZAssessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial10.1038/s41598-021-01198-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/57bc9586614c4b3fba7b9e8ba0430f3b2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01198-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are an important global issue, leading to poor patient outcomes. A potential route of transmission of HAIs is through contact with hospital privacy curtains. The aim of this study is to evaluate cleaning on reduction of curtain bacterial burden. In this pilot cluster randomized controlled trial we compared the bacterial burden between three groups of 24 curtains on a regional burn/plastic surgery ward. A control group was not cleaned. Two groups were cleaned at 3–4 day intervals with either disinfectant spray or wipe. The primary outcome was the difference in mean CFU/cm2 between day 0 to day 21. The secondary outcome was the proportion of curtains contaminated with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). By day 21, the control group was statistically higher (2.2 CFU/cm2) than spray (1.3 CFU/cm2) or wipe (1.5 CFU/cm2) (p < 0.05). After each cleaning at 3–4 day intervals, the bacterial burden on the curtains reduced to near day 0 levels; however, the level increased again over the intervening 3–4 days. By day 21, 64% of control curtains were contaminated with MRSA compared to 10% (spray) and 5% (wipe) (p < 0.05). This study show that curtains start clean and progressively become contaminated with bacteria. Regularly cleaning curtains with disinfectant spray or wipes reduces bacterial burden and MRSA contamination.Kianna CadoganSabrin BasharSaul MagnussonRakesh PatidarJohn EmbilJustin P. GawaziukMonika GawthropSong LiuAyush KumarSarvesh LogsettyNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Kianna Cadogan
Sabrin Bashar
Saul Magnusson
Rakesh Patidar
John Embil
Justin P. Gawaziuk
Monika Gawthrop
Song Liu
Ayush Kumar
Sarvesh Logsetty
Assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial
description Abstract Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are an important global issue, leading to poor patient outcomes. A potential route of transmission of HAIs is through contact with hospital privacy curtains. The aim of this study is to evaluate cleaning on reduction of curtain bacterial burden. In this pilot cluster randomized controlled trial we compared the bacterial burden between three groups of 24 curtains on a regional burn/plastic surgery ward. A control group was not cleaned. Two groups were cleaned at 3–4 day intervals with either disinfectant spray or wipe. The primary outcome was the difference in mean CFU/cm2 between day 0 to day 21. The secondary outcome was the proportion of curtains contaminated with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). By day 21, the control group was statistically higher (2.2 CFU/cm2) than spray (1.3 CFU/cm2) or wipe (1.5 CFU/cm2) (p < 0.05). After each cleaning at 3–4 day intervals, the bacterial burden on the curtains reduced to near day 0 levels; however, the level increased again over the intervening 3–4 days. By day 21, 64% of control curtains were contaminated with MRSA compared to 10% (spray) and 5% (wipe) (p < 0.05). This study show that curtains start clean and progressively become contaminated with bacteria. Regularly cleaning curtains with disinfectant spray or wipes reduces bacterial burden and MRSA contamination.
format article
author Kianna Cadogan
Sabrin Bashar
Saul Magnusson
Rakesh Patidar
John Embil
Justin P. Gawaziuk
Monika Gawthrop
Song Liu
Ayush Kumar
Sarvesh Logsetty
author_facet Kianna Cadogan
Sabrin Bashar
Saul Magnusson
Rakesh Patidar
John Embil
Justin P. Gawaziuk
Monika Gawthrop
Song Liu
Ayush Kumar
Sarvesh Logsetty
author_sort Kianna Cadogan
title Assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_short Assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_full Assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_sort assessment of cleaning methods on bacterial burden of hospital privacy curtains: a pilot randomized controlled trial
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/57bc9586614c4b3fba7b9e8ba0430f3b
work_keys_str_mv AT kiannacadogan assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sabrinbashar assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT saulmagnusson assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rakeshpatidar assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT johnembil assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT justinpgawaziuk assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT monikagawthrop assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT songliu assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ayushkumar assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sarveshlogsetty assessmentofcleaningmethodsonbacterialburdenofhospitalprivacycurtainsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1718429288079818752