Selective vs. Collective Outcomes of Collaborative Governance: The Impacts of Federal Stimulus Programs on Local and Regional Governance Outcomes

A number of studies have demonstrated that local government’s self-governing mechanisms can bring about positive collective outcomes for an entire region. However, less attention has been paid to different levels of collective outcomes (e.g., individual local governments vs. entire regions). Compari...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang-Gyu Kwak, Namhoon Ki, Suk-Joon Hwang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/57c7cb3f185b4d5b8d9eeb79b8c5d48b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:57c7cb3f185b4d5b8d9eeb79b8c5d48b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:57c7cb3f185b4d5b8d9eeb79b8c5d48b2021-11-11T19:37:17ZSelective vs. Collective Outcomes of Collaborative Governance: The Impacts of Federal Stimulus Programs on Local and Regional Governance Outcomes10.3390/su1321119412071-1050https://doaj.org/article/57c7cb3f185b4d5b8d9eeb79b8c5d48b2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11941https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050A number of studies have demonstrated that local government’s self-governing mechanisms can bring about positive collective outcomes for an entire region. However, less attention has been paid to different levels of collective outcomes (e.g., individual local governments vs. entire regions). Comparing such selective and collective outcomes in interlocal collaborations, this study attempts to explore which specific collaborative self-governing mechanisms can better work for which respective outcomes. Applying network approaches with time-series cross-sectional data, this study investigates how each local government’s network position and the network structure as a whole influence the impact of Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants on job creation in terms of the regional green economy. Empirical results demonstrate the need for separating selective and collective outcomes in developing theories of regional governance. Additionally, the results provide practitioners with advice on how to manage interlocal relationships in order to maximize collective outcomes at different levelsChang-Gyu KwakNamhoon KiSuk-Joon HwangMDPI AGarticleselective and collective outcomescollaborative governancenetwork analysisself-governing mechanismsEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 11941, p 11941 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic selective and collective outcomes
collaborative governance
network analysis
self-governing mechanisms
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle selective and collective outcomes
collaborative governance
network analysis
self-governing mechanisms
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Chang-Gyu Kwak
Namhoon Ki
Suk-Joon Hwang
Selective vs. Collective Outcomes of Collaborative Governance: The Impacts of Federal Stimulus Programs on Local and Regional Governance Outcomes
description A number of studies have demonstrated that local government’s self-governing mechanisms can bring about positive collective outcomes for an entire region. However, less attention has been paid to different levels of collective outcomes (e.g., individual local governments vs. entire regions). Comparing such selective and collective outcomes in interlocal collaborations, this study attempts to explore which specific collaborative self-governing mechanisms can better work for which respective outcomes. Applying network approaches with time-series cross-sectional data, this study investigates how each local government’s network position and the network structure as a whole influence the impact of Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants on job creation in terms of the regional green economy. Empirical results demonstrate the need for separating selective and collective outcomes in developing theories of regional governance. Additionally, the results provide practitioners with advice on how to manage interlocal relationships in order to maximize collective outcomes at different levels
format article
author Chang-Gyu Kwak
Namhoon Ki
Suk-Joon Hwang
author_facet Chang-Gyu Kwak
Namhoon Ki
Suk-Joon Hwang
author_sort Chang-Gyu Kwak
title Selective vs. Collective Outcomes of Collaborative Governance: The Impacts of Federal Stimulus Programs on Local and Regional Governance Outcomes
title_short Selective vs. Collective Outcomes of Collaborative Governance: The Impacts of Federal Stimulus Programs on Local and Regional Governance Outcomes
title_full Selective vs. Collective Outcomes of Collaborative Governance: The Impacts of Federal Stimulus Programs on Local and Regional Governance Outcomes
title_fullStr Selective vs. Collective Outcomes of Collaborative Governance: The Impacts of Federal Stimulus Programs on Local and Regional Governance Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Selective vs. Collective Outcomes of Collaborative Governance: The Impacts of Federal Stimulus Programs on Local and Regional Governance Outcomes
title_sort selective vs. collective outcomes of collaborative governance: the impacts of federal stimulus programs on local and regional governance outcomes
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/57c7cb3f185b4d5b8d9eeb79b8c5d48b
work_keys_str_mv AT changgyukwak selectivevscollectiveoutcomesofcollaborativegovernancetheimpactsoffederalstimulusprogramsonlocalandregionalgovernanceoutcomes
AT namhoonki selectivevscollectiveoutcomesofcollaborativegovernancetheimpactsoffederalstimulusprogramsonlocalandregionalgovernanceoutcomes
AT sukjoonhwang selectivevscollectiveoutcomesofcollaborativegovernancetheimpactsoffederalstimulusprogramsonlocalandregionalgovernanceoutcomes
_version_ 1718431466647453696