Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Method and Students' Critical Thinking Level in Editing Scientific Articles

<span lang="IN">The aim of this research is to explain the use of the DRTA method and the level of critical thinking in improving students' ability in editing scientific articles. The method used in this research is experimental research. The result shows that using the DRTA met...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Asep Supriyana, Emzir Emzir, Endry Boeriswati
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN ID
Publicado:	Universitas Ahmad Dahlan 2019
Materias:	drta method the level of critical thinking the ability to edit scientific articles Education (General) L7-991 Language and Literature P
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/57d0b6497e6b474d8519a6e5ecbeb9d7
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:57d0b6497e6b474d8519a6e5ecbeb9d7
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:57d0b6497e6b474d8519a6e5ecbeb9d72021-11-26T02:06:22ZDirected Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Method and Students' Critical Thinking Level in Editing Scientific Articles0215-49942548-458310.26555/bahastra.v39i2.14699https://doaj.org/article/57d0b6497e6b474d8519a6e5ecbeb9d72019-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/BAHASTRA/article/view/14699https://doaj.org/toc/0215-4994https://doaj.org/toc/2548-4583<span lang="IN">The aim of this research is to explain the use of the DRTA method and the level of critical thinking in improving students' ability in editing scientific articles. The method used in this research is experimental research. The result shows that using the DRTA method affected the ability to edit scientific articles if it is in accordance to the students’ level of critical thinking (high and low). Learning outcomes of editing scientific articles of students who have high critical thinking scales are different from learning outcomes of editing scientific articles of students who have low level of critical thinking. Students who were treated with the DRTA Method had higher level of critical thinking and had significant differences from those who had low levels of critical thinking. The acquisition of the average score showed the students who studied with the DRTA method and had a high critical thinking level are 90.1, while the score of the students who had a low critical thinking level are 79.3.</span>Asep SupriyanaEmzir EmzirEndry BoeriswatiUniversitas Ahmad Dahlanarticledrta method the level of critical thinking the ability to edit scientific articlesEducation (General)L7-991Language and LiteraturePENIDBahastra, Vol 39, Iss 2, Pp 102-109 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN ID
topic	drta method the level of critical thinking the ability to edit scientific articles Education (General) L7-991 Language and Literature P
spellingShingle	drta method the level of critical thinking the ability to edit scientific articles Education (General) L7-991 Language and Literature P Asep Supriyana Emzir Emzir Endry Boeriswati Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Method and Students' Critical Thinking Level in Editing Scientific Articles
description	<span lang="IN">The aim of this research is to explain the use of the DRTA method and the level of critical thinking in improving students' ability in editing scientific articles. The method used in this research is experimental research. The result shows that using the DRTA method affected the ability to edit scientific articles if it is in accordance to the students’ level of critical thinking (high and low). Learning outcomes of editing scientific articles of students who have high critical thinking scales are different from learning outcomes of editing scientific articles of students who have low level of critical thinking. Students who were treated with the DRTA Method had higher level of critical thinking and had significant differences from those who had low levels of critical thinking. The acquisition of the average score showed the students who studied with the DRTA method and had a high critical thinking level are 90.1, while the score of the students who had a low critical thinking level are 79.3.</span>
format	article
author	Asep Supriyana Emzir Emzir Endry Boeriswati
author_facet	Asep Supriyana Emzir Emzir Endry Boeriswati
author_sort	Asep Supriyana
title	Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Method and Students' Critical Thinking Level in Editing Scientific Articles
title_short	Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Method and Students' Critical Thinking Level in Editing Scientific Articles
title_full	Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Method and Students' Critical Thinking Level in Editing Scientific Articles
title_fullStr	Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Method and Students' Critical Thinking Level in Editing Scientific Articles
title_full_unstemmed	Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Method and Students' Critical Thinking Level in Editing Scientific Articles
title_sort	directed reading thinking activity (drta) method and students' critical thinking level in editing scientific articles
publisher	Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/57d0b6497e6b474d8519a6e5ecbeb9d7
work_keys_str_mv	AT asepsupriyana directedreadingthinkingactivitydrtamethodandstudentscriticalthinkinglevelineditingscientificarticles AT emziremzir directedreadingthinkingactivitydrtamethodandstudentscriticalthinkinglevelineditingscientificarticles AT endryboeriswati directedreadingthinkingactivitydrtamethodandstudentscriticalthinkinglevelineditingscientificarticles
_version_	1718409968399417344

Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Method and Students' Critical Thinking Level in Editing Scientific Articles

Ejemplares similares