Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test
The purpose of this study was to classify ULTT videos through transfer learning with pre-trained deep learning models and compare the performance of the models. We conducted transfer learning by combining a pre-trained convolution neural network (CNN) model into a Python-produced deep learning proce...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/57e00cfad483443f915587d71e3a9398 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:57e00cfad483443f915587d71e3a9398 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:57e00cfad483443f915587d71e3a93982021-11-25T17:46:35ZDeep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test10.3390/healthcare91115792227-9032https://doaj.org/article/57e00cfad483443f915587d71e3a93982021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/11/1579https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9032The purpose of this study was to classify ULTT videos through transfer learning with pre-trained deep learning models and compare the performance of the models. We conducted transfer learning by combining a pre-trained convolution neural network (CNN) model into a Python-produced deep learning process. Videos were processed on YouTube and 103,116 frames converted from video clips were analyzed. In the modeling implementation, the process of importing the required modules, performing the necessary data preprocessing for training, defining the model, compiling, model creation, and model fit were applied in sequence. Comparative models were Xception, InceptionV3, DenseNet201, NASNetMobile, DenseNet121, VGG16, VGG19, and ResNet101, and fine tuning was performed. They were trained in a high-performance computing environment, and validation and loss were measured as comparative indicators of performance. Relatively low validation loss and high validation accuracy were obtained from Xception, InceptionV3, and DenseNet201 models, which is evaluated as an excellent model compared with other models. On the other hand, from VGG16, VGG19, and ResNet101, relatively high validation loss and low validation accuracy were obtained compared with other models. There was a narrow range of difference between the validation accuracy and the validation loss of the Xception, InceptionV3, and DensNet201 models. This study suggests that training applied with transfer learning can classify ULTT videos, and that there is a difference in performance between models.Wansuk ChoiSeoyoon HeoMDPI AGarticledeep structured learningsupervised machine learningautomated feature extractionBrachial Plexus Tension Testsrehabilitation medicinehuman action recognitionMedicineRENHealthcare, Vol 9, Iss 1579, p 1579 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
deep structured learning supervised machine learning automated feature extraction Brachial Plexus Tension Tests rehabilitation medicine human action recognition Medicine R |
spellingShingle |
deep structured learning supervised machine learning automated feature extraction Brachial Plexus Tension Tests rehabilitation medicine human action recognition Medicine R Wansuk Choi Seoyoon Heo Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test |
description |
The purpose of this study was to classify ULTT videos through transfer learning with pre-trained deep learning models and compare the performance of the models. We conducted transfer learning by combining a pre-trained convolution neural network (CNN) model into a Python-produced deep learning process. Videos were processed on YouTube and 103,116 frames converted from video clips were analyzed. In the modeling implementation, the process of importing the required modules, performing the necessary data preprocessing for training, defining the model, compiling, model creation, and model fit were applied in sequence. Comparative models were Xception, InceptionV3, DenseNet201, NASNetMobile, DenseNet121, VGG16, VGG19, and ResNet101, and fine tuning was performed. They were trained in a high-performance computing environment, and validation and loss were measured as comparative indicators of performance. Relatively low validation loss and high validation accuracy were obtained from Xception, InceptionV3, and DenseNet201 models, which is evaluated as an excellent model compared with other models. On the other hand, from VGG16, VGG19, and ResNet101, relatively high validation loss and low validation accuracy were obtained compared with other models. There was a narrow range of difference between the validation accuracy and the validation loss of the Xception, InceptionV3, and DensNet201 models. This study suggests that training applied with transfer learning can classify ULTT videos, and that there is a difference in performance between models. |
format |
article |
author |
Wansuk Choi Seoyoon Heo |
author_facet |
Wansuk Choi Seoyoon Heo |
author_sort |
Wansuk Choi |
title |
Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test |
title_short |
Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test |
title_full |
Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test |
title_fullStr |
Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test |
title_sort |
deep learning approaches to automated video classification of upper limb tension test |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/57e00cfad483443f915587d71e3a9398 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wansukchoi deeplearningapproachestoautomatedvideoclassificationofupperlimbtensiontest AT seoyoonheo deeplearningapproachestoautomatedvideoclassificationofupperlimbtensiontest |
_version_ |
1718412043190534144 |