Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test

The purpose of this study was to classify ULTT videos through transfer learning with pre-trained deep learning models and compare the performance of the models. We conducted transfer learning by combining a pre-trained convolution neural network (CNN) model into a Python-produced deep learning proce...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wansuk Choi, Seoyoon Heo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/57e00cfad483443f915587d71e3a9398
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:57e00cfad483443f915587d71e3a9398
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:57e00cfad483443f915587d71e3a93982021-11-25T17:46:35ZDeep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test10.3390/healthcare91115792227-9032https://doaj.org/article/57e00cfad483443f915587d71e3a93982021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/11/1579https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9032The purpose of this study was to classify ULTT videos through transfer learning with pre-trained deep learning models and compare the performance of the models. We conducted transfer learning by combining a pre-trained convolution neural network (CNN) model into a Python-produced deep learning process. Videos were processed on YouTube and 103,116 frames converted from video clips were analyzed. In the modeling implementation, the process of importing the required modules, performing the necessary data preprocessing for training, defining the model, compiling, model creation, and model fit were applied in sequence. Comparative models were Xception, InceptionV3, DenseNet201, NASNetMobile, DenseNet121, VGG16, VGG19, and ResNet101, and fine tuning was performed. They were trained in a high-performance computing environment, and validation and loss were measured as comparative indicators of performance. Relatively low validation loss and high validation accuracy were obtained from Xception, InceptionV3, and DenseNet201 models, which is evaluated as an excellent model compared with other models. On the other hand, from VGG16, VGG19, and ResNet101, relatively high validation loss and low validation accuracy were obtained compared with other models. There was a narrow range of difference between the validation accuracy and the validation loss of the Xception, InceptionV3, and DensNet201 models. This study suggests that training applied with transfer learning can classify ULTT videos, and that there is a difference in performance between models.Wansuk ChoiSeoyoon HeoMDPI AGarticledeep structured learningsupervised machine learningautomated feature extractionBrachial Plexus Tension Testsrehabilitation medicinehuman action recognitionMedicineRENHealthcare, Vol 9, Iss 1579, p 1579 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic deep structured learning
supervised machine learning
automated feature extraction
Brachial Plexus Tension Tests
rehabilitation medicine
human action recognition
Medicine
R
spellingShingle deep structured learning
supervised machine learning
automated feature extraction
Brachial Plexus Tension Tests
rehabilitation medicine
human action recognition
Medicine
R
Wansuk Choi
Seoyoon Heo
Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test
description The purpose of this study was to classify ULTT videos through transfer learning with pre-trained deep learning models and compare the performance of the models. We conducted transfer learning by combining a pre-trained convolution neural network (CNN) model into a Python-produced deep learning process. Videos were processed on YouTube and 103,116 frames converted from video clips were analyzed. In the modeling implementation, the process of importing the required modules, performing the necessary data preprocessing for training, defining the model, compiling, model creation, and model fit were applied in sequence. Comparative models were Xception, InceptionV3, DenseNet201, NASNetMobile, DenseNet121, VGG16, VGG19, and ResNet101, and fine tuning was performed. They were trained in a high-performance computing environment, and validation and loss were measured as comparative indicators of performance. Relatively low validation loss and high validation accuracy were obtained from Xception, InceptionV3, and DenseNet201 models, which is evaluated as an excellent model compared with other models. On the other hand, from VGG16, VGG19, and ResNet101, relatively high validation loss and low validation accuracy were obtained compared with other models. There was a narrow range of difference between the validation accuracy and the validation loss of the Xception, InceptionV3, and DensNet201 models. This study suggests that training applied with transfer learning can classify ULTT videos, and that there is a difference in performance between models.
format article
author Wansuk Choi
Seoyoon Heo
author_facet Wansuk Choi
Seoyoon Heo
author_sort Wansuk Choi
title Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test
title_short Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test
title_full Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test
title_fullStr Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test
title_full_unstemmed Deep Learning Approaches to Automated Video Classification of Upper Limb Tension Test
title_sort deep learning approaches to automated video classification of upper limb tension test
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/57e00cfad483443f915587d71e3a9398
work_keys_str_mv AT wansukchoi deeplearningapproachestoautomatedvideoclassificationofupperlimbtensiontest
AT seoyoonheo deeplearningapproachestoautomatedvideoclassificationofupperlimbtensiontest
_version_ 1718412043190534144