No effect of intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation on inflammation and quality of life: a randomized and parallel design clinical trial

Abstract Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) elicits muscle contraction and has been shown to improvement of quality of life. However, if NMES improvement the quality of life and attenuate the inflammation is not fully understood. Therefore, our aim sought to assess the effects of short-term...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ana C. B. Marini, Reika D. Motobu, Patrícia C. B. Lobo, Paula A. Monteiro, Gustavo D. Pimentel
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5838a69ef98a413db93e3d1adccecd5f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5838a69ef98a413db93e3d1adccecd5f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5838a69ef98a413db93e3d1adccecd5f2021-11-14T12:22:49ZNo effect of intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation on inflammation and quality of life: a randomized and parallel design clinical trial10.1038/s41598-021-01498-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/5838a69ef98a413db93e3d1adccecd5f2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01498-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) elicits muscle contraction and has been shown to improvement of quality of life. However, if NMES improvement the quality of life and attenuate the inflammation is not fully understood. Therefore, our aim sought to assess the effects of short-term of intradialytic NMES on inflammation and quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis. A randomized clinical trial conducted with parallel design enrolled adult hemodialysis patients three times a week during 1 month. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups (control group, n = 11; 4F/7 M) or (NMES group, n = 10; 4F/6 M). Pre-and post-intervention, was measured the high-sensitivity C reactive protein, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, and TNFα by the ELISA, and quality of life was applied using the SF-36. During each hemodialysis session, NMES was applied bilaterally at thigh and calves for 40 min. There was not change in cytokines (hs-CRP, IL-6, IL-10, and TNFα) concentrations time × group interaction. In addition, no difference was found in eight domains of quality of life. In addition, the groups did not differ for muscle strength and muscle mass. In conclusion, we found that intradialytic NMES did not change inflammation neither quality of life.Ana C. B. MariniReika D. MotobuPatrícia C. B. LoboPaula A. MonteiroGustavo D. PimentelNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Ana C. B. Marini
Reika D. Motobu
Patrícia C. B. Lobo
Paula A. Monteiro
Gustavo D. Pimentel
No effect of intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation on inflammation and quality of life: a randomized and parallel design clinical trial
description Abstract Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) elicits muscle contraction and has been shown to improvement of quality of life. However, if NMES improvement the quality of life and attenuate the inflammation is not fully understood. Therefore, our aim sought to assess the effects of short-term of intradialytic NMES on inflammation and quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis. A randomized clinical trial conducted with parallel design enrolled adult hemodialysis patients three times a week during 1 month. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups (control group, n = 11; 4F/7 M) or (NMES group, n = 10; 4F/6 M). Pre-and post-intervention, was measured the high-sensitivity C reactive protein, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, and TNFα by the ELISA, and quality of life was applied using the SF-36. During each hemodialysis session, NMES was applied bilaterally at thigh and calves for 40 min. There was not change in cytokines (hs-CRP, IL-6, IL-10, and TNFα) concentrations time × group interaction. In addition, no difference was found in eight domains of quality of life. In addition, the groups did not differ for muscle strength and muscle mass. In conclusion, we found that intradialytic NMES did not change inflammation neither quality of life.
format article
author Ana C. B. Marini
Reika D. Motobu
Patrícia C. B. Lobo
Paula A. Monteiro
Gustavo D. Pimentel
author_facet Ana C. B. Marini
Reika D. Motobu
Patrícia C. B. Lobo
Paula A. Monteiro
Gustavo D. Pimentel
author_sort Ana C. B. Marini
title No effect of intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation on inflammation and quality of life: a randomized and parallel design clinical trial
title_short No effect of intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation on inflammation and quality of life: a randomized and parallel design clinical trial
title_full No effect of intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation on inflammation and quality of life: a randomized and parallel design clinical trial
title_fullStr No effect of intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation on inflammation and quality of life: a randomized and parallel design clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed No effect of intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation on inflammation and quality of life: a randomized and parallel design clinical trial
title_sort no effect of intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation on inflammation and quality of life: a randomized and parallel design clinical trial
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5838a69ef98a413db93e3d1adccecd5f
work_keys_str_mv AT anacbmarini noeffectofintradialyticneuromuscularelectricalstimulationoninflammationandqualityoflifearandomizedandparalleldesignclinicaltrial
AT reikadmotobu noeffectofintradialyticneuromuscularelectricalstimulationoninflammationandqualityoflifearandomizedandparalleldesignclinicaltrial
AT patriciacblobo noeffectofintradialyticneuromuscularelectricalstimulationoninflammationandqualityoflifearandomizedandparalleldesignclinicaltrial
AT paulaamonteiro noeffectofintradialyticneuromuscularelectricalstimulationoninflammationandqualityoflifearandomizedandparalleldesignclinicaltrial
AT gustavodpimentel noeffectofintradialyticneuromuscularelectricalstimulationoninflammationandqualityoflifearandomizedandparalleldesignclinicaltrial
_version_ 1718429226780065792