Do We Need a (New) Theory of Lexicography?

In the current transition from printed to electronic dictionaries the question has been raised whether we need a new theory of lexicography that may guide the conception and production of lexicographical e-tools or if we can use the theories already developed in the era of printed works. In order to...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sven Tarp
Formato: article
Lenguaje:AF
DE
EN
FR
NL
Publicado: Woordeboek van die Afrikaanse Taal-WAT 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/587f1b58cce9453c864823512d2246d4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:587f1b58cce9453c864823512d2246d4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:587f1b58cce9453c864823512d2246d42021-12-03T07:13:07ZDo We Need a (New) Theory of Lexicography?10.5788/22-1-10101684-49042224-0039https://doaj.org/article/587f1b58cce9453c864823512d2246d42012-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://lexikos.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/1010https://doaj.org/toc/1684-4904https://doaj.org/toc/2224-0039In the current transition from printed to electronic dictionaries the question has been raised whether we need a new theory of lexicography that may guide the conception and production of lexicographical e-tools or if we can use the theories already developed in the era of printed works. In order to answer this question the article first of all discusses the question whether a lexicographical theory exists, is possible at all or even wanted. It shows that the various approaches to this question are mainly due to the fact that the very concept of theory is widely disputed within lexicographical circles. In this respect, it briefly discusses the Anglo-Saxon academic tradition according to which science is only related to natural phenomena and where all other phenomena are referred to the spheres of art and craft, and it shows that this tradition is widely opposed by the traditions in other parts of the world. Upon this basis, the article shows that a lexicographical theory is not only possible but that various highly useful theories already exist. Finally, it claims that these theories, especially the ones that are not only focusing on the printed dictionary form, should not be rejected but should be further enhanced and improved in close interaction between lexicography and other consultation disciplines within the broad area of information science.Sven TarpWoordeboek van die Afrikaanse Taal-WATarticlelexicographylexicographical theoryconcept of lexicographical theoryfunction theoryacademic status of lexicographyinterdisciplinary vocation of lexicographydictionariesconsultation toolsinformation sciencePhilology. LinguisticsP1-1091Languages and literature of Eastern Asia, Africa, OceaniaPL1-8844Germanic languages. Scandinavian languagesPD1-7159AFDEENFRNLLexikos, Vol 22, Pp 321-332 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language AF
DE
EN
FR
NL
topic lexicography
lexicographical theory
concept of lexicographical theory
function theory
academic status of lexicography
interdisciplinary vocation of lexicography
dictionaries
consultation tools
information science
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Languages and literature of Eastern Asia, Africa, Oceania
PL1-8844
Germanic languages. Scandinavian languages
PD1-7159
spellingShingle lexicography
lexicographical theory
concept of lexicographical theory
function theory
academic status of lexicography
interdisciplinary vocation of lexicography
dictionaries
consultation tools
information science
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Languages and literature of Eastern Asia, Africa, Oceania
PL1-8844
Germanic languages. Scandinavian languages
PD1-7159
Sven Tarp
Do We Need a (New) Theory of Lexicography?
description In the current transition from printed to electronic dictionaries the question has been raised whether we need a new theory of lexicography that may guide the conception and production of lexicographical e-tools or if we can use the theories already developed in the era of printed works. In order to answer this question the article first of all discusses the question whether a lexicographical theory exists, is possible at all or even wanted. It shows that the various approaches to this question are mainly due to the fact that the very concept of theory is widely disputed within lexicographical circles. In this respect, it briefly discusses the Anglo-Saxon academic tradition according to which science is only related to natural phenomena and where all other phenomena are referred to the spheres of art and craft, and it shows that this tradition is widely opposed by the traditions in other parts of the world. Upon this basis, the article shows that a lexicographical theory is not only possible but that various highly useful theories already exist. Finally, it claims that these theories, especially the ones that are not only focusing on the printed dictionary form, should not be rejected but should be further enhanced and improved in close interaction between lexicography and other consultation disciplines within the broad area of information science.
format article
author Sven Tarp
author_facet Sven Tarp
author_sort Sven Tarp
title Do We Need a (New) Theory of Lexicography?
title_short Do We Need a (New) Theory of Lexicography?
title_full Do We Need a (New) Theory of Lexicography?
title_fullStr Do We Need a (New) Theory of Lexicography?
title_full_unstemmed Do We Need a (New) Theory of Lexicography?
title_sort do we need a (new) theory of lexicography?
publisher Woordeboek van die Afrikaanse Taal-WAT
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/587f1b58cce9453c864823512d2246d4
work_keys_str_mv AT sventarp doweneedanewtheoryoflexicography
_version_ 1718373872706781184