How are we actually doing? Comparing water and sanitation in Kenya with MDG and SDG criteria

This cross-sectional study assesses the extent to which water and sanitation access differs among respondents in three counties in Western and Rift Valley Kenya. By using both Millennium Development Goal (MDG) and Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) criteria, we utilize important geographical nuances...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Lauren Trepanier, Josephine Orare, John Nyagwencha, Caitlin Grady
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	IWA Publishing 2021
Materias:	kenya monitoring and evaluation sanitation sustainable development goals (sdgs) water water quality Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/58bd016deaf942d1a72e28a8956735bf
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:58bd016deaf942d1a72e28a8956735bf
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:58bd016deaf942d1a72e28a8956735bf2021-11-05T19:34:33ZHow are we actually doing? Comparing water and sanitation in Kenya with MDG and SDG criteria2043-90832408-936210.2166/washdev.2021.023https://doaj.org/article/58bd016deaf942d1a72e28a8956735bf2021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://washdev.iwaponline.com/content/11/4/638https://doaj.org/toc/2043-9083https://doaj.org/toc/2408-9362This cross-sectional study assesses the extent to which water and sanitation access differs among respondents in three counties in Western and Rift Valley Kenya. By using both Millennium Development Goal (MDG) and Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) criteria, we utilize important geographical nuances of SDG water and sanitation provisioning across rural and urban settings to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the MDGs and SDGs in each context. Purposive heterogenous sampling using local knowledge was employed to select households who represent varying rural and urban contexts with differing land use practices. Differences in water and sanitation access based on varying MDG/SDG water criteria showcase how the shift from technology-based criteria to service provisioning criteria affects understanding of progress and remaining challenges toward water and sanitation provisioning. Results indicate that although 72% of respondents have Improved Water per MDG criteria, only 34% have Safely Managed Water and 36% have Basic Water as per the SDGs. Component analyses show SDG criteria with the lowest percentages of achievement were: microbial and fluoride water quality and that sanitation facilities were not shared with other households. These results pinpoint areas where there is a need for increased research and investment surrounding how to achieve specific SDG criteria and increase access to safe water and sanitation. Highlights SDG water service provisioning is lower than MDG Improved Water access.; Safely Managed Water and Sanitation criteria with lowest percentages of achievement are fluoride and microbial water quality and sanitation facilities, which are not shared.; Component analyses show which SDG criteria may limit realization of water and sanitation provisioning.; SDG criteria have stronger linkages between WASH provisioning and rural and urban settings.;Lauren TrepanierJosephine OrareJohn NyagwenchaCaitlin GradyIWA Publishingarticlekenyamonitoring and evaluationsanitationsustainable development goals (sdgs)waterwater qualityEnvironmental technology. Sanitary engineeringTD1-1066ENJournal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, Vol 11, Iss 4, Pp 638-656 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	kenya monitoring and evaluation sanitation sustainable development goals (sdgs) water water quality Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066
spellingShingle	kenya monitoring and evaluation sanitation sustainable development goals (sdgs) water water quality Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 Lauren Trepanier Josephine Orare John Nyagwencha Caitlin Grady How are we actually doing? Comparing water and sanitation in Kenya with MDG and SDG criteria
description	This cross-sectional study assesses the extent to which water and sanitation access differs among respondents in three counties in Western and Rift Valley Kenya. By using both Millennium Development Goal (MDG) and Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) criteria, we utilize important geographical nuances of SDG water and sanitation provisioning across rural and urban settings to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the MDGs and SDGs in each context. Purposive heterogenous sampling using local knowledge was employed to select households who represent varying rural and urban contexts with differing land use practices. Differences in water and sanitation access based on varying MDG/SDG water criteria showcase how the shift from technology-based criteria to service provisioning criteria affects understanding of progress and remaining challenges toward water and sanitation provisioning. Results indicate that although 72% of respondents have Improved Water per MDG criteria, only 34% have Safely Managed Water and 36% have Basic Water as per the SDGs. Component analyses show SDG criteria with the lowest percentages of achievement were: microbial and fluoride water quality and that sanitation facilities were not shared with other households. These results pinpoint areas where there is a need for increased research and investment surrounding how to achieve specific SDG criteria and increase access to safe water and sanitation. Highlights SDG water service provisioning is lower than MDG Improved Water access.; Safely Managed Water and Sanitation criteria with lowest percentages of achievement are fluoride and microbial water quality and sanitation facilities, which are not shared.; Component analyses show which SDG criteria may limit realization of water and sanitation provisioning.; SDG criteria have stronger linkages between WASH provisioning and rural and urban settings.;
format	article
author	Lauren Trepanier Josephine Orare John Nyagwencha Caitlin Grady
author_facet	Lauren Trepanier Josephine Orare John Nyagwencha Caitlin Grady
author_sort	Lauren Trepanier
title	How are we actually doing? Comparing water and sanitation in Kenya with MDG and SDG criteria
title_short	How are we actually doing? Comparing water and sanitation in Kenya with MDG and SDG criteria
title_full	How are we actually doing? Comparing water and sanitation in Kenya with MDG and SDG criteria
title_fullStr	How are we actually doing? Comparing water and sanitation in Kenya with MDG and SDG criteria
title_full_unstemmed	How are we actually doing? Comparing water and sanitation in Kenya with MDG and SDG criteria
title_sort	how are we actually doing? comparing water and sanitation in kenya with mdg and sdg criteria
publisher	IWA Publishing
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/58bd016deaf942d1a72e28a8956735bf
work_keys_str_mv	AT laurentrepanier howareweactuallydoingcomparingwaterandsanitationinkenyawithmdgandsdgcriteria AT josephineorare howareweactuallydoingcomparingwaterandsanitationinkenyawithmdgandsdgcriteria AT johnnyagwencha howareweactuallydoingcomparingwaterandsanitationinkenyawithmdgandsdgcriteria AT caitlingrady howareweactuallydoingcomparingwaterandsanitationinkenyawithmdgandsdgcriteria
_version_	1718444038857687040

How are we actually doing? Comparing water and sanitation in Kenya with MDG and SDG criteria

Ejemplares similares