EDITORIAL: A complicated post-documentary era
SINCE early in the first decade of this century, the concept of documentary—never beyond contestation—has entered into a state of generic uncertainty. Reflecting on these developments, John Corner, in an influential article, dubbed the current context of production as ‘Post-documentary’ (Corner, 200...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Asia Pacific Network
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/58f73ff8db66489a969a7f3365056b5d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:58f73ff8db66489a969a7f3365056b5d |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:58f73ff8db66489a969a7f3365056b5d2021-12-02T08:57:09ZEDITORIAL: A complicated post-documentary era10.24135/pjr.v21i2.1091023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/58f73ff8db66489a969a7f3365056b5d2015-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/109https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035SINCE early in the first decade of this century, the concept of documentary—never beyond contestation—has entered into a state of generic uncertainty. Reflecting on these developments, John Corner, in an influential article, dubbed the current context of production as ‘Post-documentary’ (Corner, 2002). In his view, the documentary tradition has always encompassed a range of approaches: 1. Documentary as social commentary seeking to inform audiences as citizens rather than consumers. 2. Documentary as Investigative Reporting, once the most extensive use of documentary methods on television. 3. Documentary as Radical Interrogation and Agit-Prop as found in the practices of independent cinema. 4. Documentary as popular ‘factual’ entertainment driven by ratings and box office.Barry KingAsia Pacific NetworkarticleCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 21, Iss 2 (2015) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 |
spellingShingle |
Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 Barry King EDITORIAL: A complicated post-documentary era |
description |
SINCE early in the first decade of this century, the concept of documentary—never beyond contestation—has entered into a state of generic uncertainty. Reflecting on these developments, John Corner, in an influential article, dubbed the current context of production as ‘Post-documentary’ (Corner, 2002). In his view, the documentary tradition has always encompassed a range of approaches:
1. Documentary as social commentary seeking to inform audiences as citizens rather than consumers.
2. Documentary as Investigative Reporting, once the most extensive use of documentary methods on television.
3. Documentary as Radical Interrogation and Agit-Prop as found in the practices of independent cinema.
4. Documentary as popular ‘factual’ entertainment driven by ratings and box office. |
format |
article |
author |
Barry King |
author_facet |
Barry King |
author_sort |
Barry King |
title |
EDITORIAL: A complicated post-documentary era |
title_short |
EDITORIAL: A complicated post-documentary era |
title_full |
EDITORIAL: A complicated post-documentary era |
title_fullStr |
EDITORIAL: A complicated post-documentary era |
title_full_unstemmed |
EDITORIAL: A complicated post-documentary era |
title_sort |
editorial: a complicated post-documentary era |
publisher |
Asia Pacific Network |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/58f73ff8db66489a969a7f3365056b5d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT barryking editorialacomplicatedpostdocumentaryera |
_version_ |
1718398303459082240 |