The bifidobacterial distribution in the microbiome of captive primates reflects parvorder and feed specialization of the host

Abstract Bifidobacteria, which commonly inhabit the primate gut, are beneficial contributors to host wellbeing. Anatomical differences and natural habitat allow an arrangement of primates into two main parvorders; New World monkeys (NWM) and Old World monkeys (OWM). The number of newly described bif...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Nikol Modrackova, Adam Stovicek, Johanna Burtscher, Petra Bolechova, Jiri Killer, Konrad J. Domig, Vera Neuzil-Bunesova
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/592520a262c74eaca64bf74cacaec176
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:592520a262c74eaca64bf74cacaec176
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:592520a262c74eaca64bf74cacaec1762021-12-02T16:30:09ZThe bifidobacterial distribution in the microbiome of captive primates reflects parvorder and feed specialization of the host10.1038/s41598-021-94824-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/592520a262c74eaca64bf74cacaec1762021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94824-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Bifidobacteria, which commonly inhabit the primate gut, are beneficial contributors to host wellbeing. Anatomical differences and natural habitat allow an arrangement of primates into two main parvorders; New World monkeys (NWM) and Old World monkeys (OWM). The number of newly described bifidobacterial species is clearly elevated in NWM. This corresponds to our finding that bifidobacteria were the dominant group of cultivated gut anaerobes in NWM, while their numbers halved in OWM and were often replaced by Clostridiaceae with sarcina morphology. We examined an extended MALDI-TOF MS database as a potential identification tool for rapid screening of bifidobacterial distribution in captive primates. Bifidobacterial isolates of NWM were assigned mainly to species of primate origin, while OWM possessed typically multi-host bifidobacteria. Moreover, bifidobacterial counts reflected the feed specialization of captive primates decreasing from frugivore-insectivores, gummivore-insectivores, frugivore-folivores to frugivore-omnivores. Amplicon sequencing analysis supported this trend with regards to the inverse ratio of Actinobacteria and Firmicutes. In addition, a significantly higher diversity of the bacterial population in OWM was found. The evolution specialization of primates seems to be responsible for Bifidobacterium abundance and species occurrence. Balanced microbiota of captive primates could be supported by optimized prebiotic and probiotic stimulation based on the primate host.Nikol ModrackovaAdam StovicekJohanna BurtscherPetra BolechovaJiri KillerKonrad J. DomigVera Neuzil-BunesovaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Nikol Modrackova Adam Stovicek Johanna Burtscher Petra Bolechova Jiri Killer Konrad J. Domig Vera Neuzil-Bunesova The bifidobacterial distribution in the microbiome of captive primates reflects parvorder and feed specialization of the host
description	Abstract Bifidobacteria, which commonly inhabit the primate gut, are beneficial contributors to host wellbeing. Anatomical differences and natural habitat allow an arrangement of primates into two main parvorders; New World monkeys (NWM) and Old World monkeys (OWM). The number of newly described bifidobacterial species is clearly elevated in NWM. This corresponds to our finding that bifidobacteria were the dominant group of cultivated gut anaerobes in NWM, while their numbers halved in OWM and were often replaced by Clostridiaceae with sarcina morphology. We examined an extended MALDI-TOF MS database as a potential identification tool for rapid screening of bifidobacterial distribution in captive primates. Bifidobacterial isolates of NWM were assigned mainly to species of primate origin, while OWM possessed typically multi-host bifidobacteria. Moreover, bifidobacterial counts reflected the feed specialization of captive primates decreasing from frugivore-insectivores, gummivore-insectivores, frugivore-folivores to frugivore-omnivores. Amplicon sequencing analysis supported this trend with regards to the inverse ratio of Actinobacteria and Firmicutes. In addition, a significantly higher diversity of the bacterial population in OWM was found. The evolution specialization of primates seems to be responsible for Bifidobacterium abundance and species occurrence. Balanced microbiota of captive primates could be supported by optimized prebiotic and probiotic stimulation based on the primate host.
format	article
author	Nikol Modrackova Adam Stovicek Johanna Burtscher Petra Bolechova Jiri Killer Konrad J. Domig Vera Neuzil-Bunesova
author_facet	Nikol Modrackova Adam Stovicek Johanna Burtscher Petra Bolechova Jiri Killer Konrad J. Domig Vera Neuzil-Bunesova
author_sort	Nikol Modrackova
title	The bifidobacterial distribution in the microbiome of captive primates reflects parvorder and feed specialization of the host
title_short	The bifidobacterial distribution in the microbiome of captive primates reflects parvorder and feed specialization of the host
title_full	The bifidobacterial distribution in the microbiome of captive primates reflects parvorder and feed specialization of the host
title_fullStr	The bifidobacterial distribution in the microbiome of captive primates reflects parvorder and feed specialization of the host
title_full_unstemmed	The bifidobacterial distribution in the microbiome of captive primates reflects parvorder and feed specialization of the host
title_sort	bifidobacterial distribution in the microbiome of captive primates reflects parvorder and feed specialization of the host
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/592520a262c74eaca64bf74cacaec176
work_keys_str_mv	AT nikolmodrackova thebifidobacterialdistributioninthemicrobiomeofcaptiveprimatesreflectsparvorderandfeedspecializationofthehost AT adamstovicek thebifidobacterialdistributioninthemicrobiomeofcaptiveprimatesreflectsparvorderandfeedspecializationofthehost AT johannaburtscher thebifidobacterialdistributioninthemicrobiomeofcaptiveprimatesreflectsparvorderandfeedspecializationofthehost AT petrabolechova thebifidobacterialdistributioninthemicrobiomeofcaptiveprimatesreflectsparvorderandfeedspecializationofthehost AT jirikiller thebifidobacterialdistributioninthemicrobiomeofcaptiveprimatesreflectsparvorderandfeedspecializationofthehost AT konradjdomig thebifidobacterialdistributioninthemicrobiomeofcaptiveprimatesreflectsparvorderandfeedspecializationofthehost AT veraneuzilbunesova thebifidobacterialdistributioninthemicrobiomeofcaptiveprimatesreflectsparvorderandfeedspecializationofthehost AT nikolmodrackova bifidobacterialdistributioninthemicrobiomeofcaptiveprimatesreflectsparvorderandfeedspecializationofthehost AT adamstovicek bifidobacterialdistributioninthemicrobiomeofcaptiveprimatesreflectsparvorderandfeedspecializationofthehost AT johannaburtscher bifidobacterialdistributioninthemicrobiomeofcaptiveprimatesreflectsparvorderandfeedspecializationofthehost AT petrabolechova bifidobacterialdistributioninthemicrobiomeofcaptiveprimatesreflectsparvorderandfeedspecializationofthehost AT jirikiller bifidobacterialdistributioninthemicrobiomeofcaptiveprimatesreflectsparvorderandfeedspecializationofthehost AT konradjdomig bifidobacterialdistributioninthemicrobiomeofcaptiveprimatesreflectsparvorderandfeedspecializationofthehost AT veraneuzilbunesova bifidobacterialdistributioninthemicrobiomeofcaptiveprimatesreflectsparvorderandfeedspecializationofthehost
_version_	1718383930812399616

The bifidobacterial distribution in the microbiome of captive primates reflects parvorder and feed specialization of the host

Ejemplares similares