Communication strategies in the prevention of type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes in vulnerable groups: a scoping review

Abstract Background The global prevalence of diabetes is nearly 9%, with an upward trend in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and gestational diabetes (GDM). Although evidence shows that vulnerable groups are affected disproportionally, these groups are difficult to reach in terms of preventive measur...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jessica Breuing, Christine Joisten, Annika Lena Neuhaus, Simone Heß, Lena Kusche, Fabiola Haas, Mark Spiller, Dawid Pieper
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/592b6a97264b4e3ca3398b62ebfb16e8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:592b6a97264b4e3ca3398b62ebfb16e8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:592b6a97264b4e3ca3398b62ebfb16e82021-11-28T12:06:34ZCommunication strategies in the prevention of type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes in vulnerable groups: a scoping review10.1186/s13643-021-01846-82046-4053https://doaj.org/article/592b6a97264b4e3ca3398b62ebfb16e82021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01846-8https://doaj.org/toc/2046-4053Abstract Background The global prevalence of diabetes is nearly 9%, with an upward trend in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and gestational diabetes (GDM). Although evidence shows that vulnerable groups are affected disproportionally, these groups are difficult to reach in terms of preventive measures. Currently, there is no gold standard regarding communication strategies and/or public awareness campaigns. Methods We conducted a scoping review in September 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the results of the electronic literature search in several databases, including Medline, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. Extracted data were charted, categorized, and summarized. Results All of the included articles (n=24) targeted T2DM; none targeted GDM. We identified the following five different vulnerable groups within the identified studies: migrants (n=9), ethnic groups such as African Americans (n=8), people with low socioeconomic status (n=3), older people (n=1), and people in need of care (n=1). Three categories of communication strategies were identified as follows: adapted diabetes prevention programs (n=21), community health workers (n=5), and technical approaches (n=9). Conclusion We found different approaches for preventive interventions for T2DM. Some of these approaches were already adapted to known barriers. Communication strategies should be adapted to barriers and facilitating factors to increase participation and motivation.Jessica BreuingChristine JoistenAnnika Lena NeuhausSimone HeßLena KuscheFabiola HaasMark SpillerDawid PieperBMCarticleType 2 diabetes mellitusPreventionVulnerable groupsCommunication strategiesMedicineRENSystematic Reviews, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Prevention
Vulnerable groups
Communication strategies
Medicine
R
spellingShingle Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Prevention
Vulnerable groups
Communication strategies
Medicine
R
Jessica Breuing
Christine Joisten
Annika Lena Neuhaus
Simone Heß
Lena Kusche
Fabiola Haas
Mark Spiller
Dawid Pieper
Communication strategies in the prevention of type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes in vulnerable groups: a scoping review
description Abstract Background The global prevalence of diabetes is nearly 9%, with an upward trend in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and gestational diabetes (GDM). Although evidence shows that vulnerable groups are affected disproportionally, these groups are difficult to reach in terms of preventive measures. Currently, there is no gold standard regarding communication strategies and/or public awareness campaigns. Methods We conducted a scoping review in September 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the results of the electronic literature search in several databases, including Medline, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. Extracted data were charted, categorized, and summarized. Results All of the included articles (n=24) targeted T2DM; none targeted GDM. We identified the following five different vulnerable groups within the identified studies: migrants (n=9), ethnic groups such as African Americans (n=8), people with low socioeconomic status (n=3), older people (n=1), and people in need of care (n=1). Three categories of communication strategies were identified as follows: adapted diabetes prevention programs (n=21), community health workers (n=5), and technical approaches (n=9). Conclusion We found different approaches for preventive interventions for T2DM. Some of these approaches were already adapted to known barriers. Communication strategies should be adapted to barriers and facilitating factors to increase participation and motivation.
format article
author Jessica Breuing
Christine Joisten
Annika Lena Neuhaus
Simone Heß
Lena Kusche
Fabiola Haas
Mark Spiller
Dawid Pieper
author_facet Jessica Breuing
Christine Joisten
Annika Lena Neuhaus
Simone Heß
Lena Kusche
Fabiola Haas
Mark Spiller
Dawid Pieper
author_sort Jessica Breuing
title Communication strategies in the prevention of type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes in vulnerable groups: a scoping review
title_short Communication strategies in the prevention of type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes in vulnerable groups: a scoping review
title_full Communication strategies in the prevention of type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes in vulnerable groups: a scoping review
title_fullStr Communication strategies in the prevention of type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes in vulnerable groups: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Communication strategies in the prevention of type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes in vulnerable groups: a scoping review
title_sort communication strategies in the prevention of type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes in vulnerable groups: a scoping review
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/592b6a97264b4e3ca3398b62ebfb16e8
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicabreuing communicationstrategiesinthepreventionoftype2diabetesandgestationaldiabetesinvulnerablegroupsascopingreview
AT christinejoisten communicationstrategiesinthepreventionoftype2diabetesandgestationaldiabetesinvulnerablegroupsascopingreview
AT annikalenaneuhaus communicationstrategiesinthepreventionoftype2diabetesandgestationaldiabetesinvulnerablegroupsascopingreview
AT simoneheß communicationstrategiesinthepreventionoftype2diabetesandgestationaldiabetesinvulnerablegroupsascopingreview
AT lenakusche communicationstrategiesinthepreventionoftype2diabetesandgestationaldiabetesinvulnerablegroupsascopingreview
AT fabiolahaas communicationstrategiesinthepreventionoftype2diabetesandgestationaldiabetesinvulnerablegroupsascopingreview
AT markspiller communicationstrategiesinthepreventionoftype2diabetesandgestationaldiabetesinvulnerablegroupsascopingreview
AT dawidpieper communicationstrategiesinthepreventionoftype2diabetesandgestationaldiabetesinvulnerablegroupsascopingreview
_version_ 1718408198692536320