Development of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) neurophysiology has been widely applied worldwide, but it is often contaminated by confounders other than cortical stimulus-evoked activities. Although advanced sham coils that elaborately mimic active stimulation have recently been developed, their performanc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayuko Takano, Jiri Havlicek, Dan Phillips, Shinichiro Nakajima, Masaru Mimura, Yoshihiro Noda
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5a2cc0489b914bea841dd5f1ee33eb30
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5a2cc0489b914bea841dd5f1ee33eb30
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5a2cc0489b914bea841dd5f1ee33eb302021-11-25T18:06:47ZDevelopment of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications10.3390/jpm111110582075-4426https://doaj.org/article/5a2cc0489b914bea841dd5f1ee33eb302021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/11/1058https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) neurophysiology has been widely applied worldwide, but it is often contaminated by confounders other than cortical stimulus-evoked activities. Although advanced sham coils that elaborately mimic active stimulation have recently been developed, their performance is not examined in detail. Developing such sham coils is crucial to improve the accuracy of TMS neurophysiology. Herein, we examined the specifications of the sham coil by comparison with the active coil. The magnetic flux and click sound pressure changes were measured when the stimulus intensity was varied from 10% to 100% maximum stimulator output (MSO), and the changes in coil surface temperature over time with continuous stimulation at 50% MSO for each coil. The magnetic flux change at the center of the coil showed a peak of 12.51 (kT/s) for the active coil, whereas it was 0.41 (kT/s) for the sham coil. Although both coils showed a linear change in magnetic flux as the stimulus intensity increased, due to the difference in coil winding structure, the sham coil took less than half the time to overheat and had 5 dB louder coil click sounds than the active coil. The sham coil showed a sufficiently small flux change at the center of the coil, but the flux change from the periphery of the coil was comparable to that of the active coil. Future use of high-quality sham coil will extend our understanding of the TMS neurophysiology of the cortex at the stimulation site.Mayuko TakanoJiri HavlicekDan PhillipsShinichiro NakajimaMasaru MimuraYoshihiro NodaMDPI AGarticlesham coiltranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)magnetic fluxmonophasic stimulationfigure-of-eight coilMedicineRENJournal of Personalized Medicine, Vol 11, Iss 1058, p 1058 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic sham coil
transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
magnetic flux
monophasic stimulation
figure-of-eight coil
Medicine
R
spellingShingle sham coil
transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
magnetic flux
monophasic stimulation
figure-of-eight coil
Medicine
R
Mayuko Takano
Jiri Havlicek
Dan Phillips
Shinichiro Nakajima
Masaru Mimura
Yoshihiro Noda
Development of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications
description Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) neurophysiology has been widely applied worldwide, but it is often contaminated by confounders other than cortical stimulus-evoked activities. Although advanced sham coils that elaborately mimic active stimulation have recently been developed, their performance is not examined in detail. Developing such sham coils is crucial to improve the accuracy of TMS neurophysiology. Herein, we examined the specifications of the sham coil by comparison with the active coil. The magnetic flux and click sound pressure changes were measured when the stimulus intensity was varied from 10% to 100% maximum stimulator output (MSO), and the changes in coil surface temperature over time with continuous stimulation at 50% MSO for each coil. The magnetic flux change at the center of the coil showed a peak of 12.51 (kT/s) for the active coil, whereas it was 0.41 (kT/s) for the sham coil. Although both coils showed a linear change in magnetic flux as the stimulus intensity increased, due to the difference in coil winding structure, the sham coil took less than half the time to overheat and had 5 dB louder coil click sounds than the active coil. The sham coil showed a sufficiently small flux change at the center of the coil, but the flux change from the periphery of the coil was comparable to that of the active coil. Future use of high-quality sham coil will extend our understanding of the TMS neurophysiology of the cortex at the stimulation site.
format article
author Mayuko Takano
Jiri Havlicek
Dan Phillips
Shinichiro Nakajima
Masaru Mimura
Yoshihiro Noda
author_facet Mayuko Takano
Jiri Havlicek
Dan Phillips
Shinichiro Nakajima
Masaru Mimura
Yoshihiro Noda
author_sort Mayuko Takano
title Development of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications
title_short Development of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications
title_full Development of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications
title_fullStr Development of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications
title_full_unstemmed Development of an Advanced Sham Coil for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Examination of Its Specifications
title_sort development of an advanced sham coil for transcranial magnetic stimulation and examination of its specifications
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5a2cc0489b914bea841dd5f1ee33eb30
work_keys_str_mv AT mayukotakano developmentofanadvancedshamcoilfortranscranialmagneticstimulationandexaminationofitsspecifications
AT jirihavlicek developmentofanadvancedshamcoilfortranscranialmagneticstimulationandexaminationofitsspecifications
AT danphillips developmentofanadvancedshamcoilfortranscranialmagneticstimulationandexaminationofitsspecifications
AT shinichironakajima developmentofanadvancedshamcoilfortranscranialmagneticstimulationandexaminationofitsspecifications
AT masarumimura developmentofanadvancedshamcoilfortranscranialmagneticstimulationandexaminationofitsspecifications
AT yoshihironoda developmentofanadvancedshamcoilfortranscranialmagneticstimulationandexaminationofitsspecifications
_version_ 1718411617106919424