Clinical Outcomes of Toric Intraocular Lenses: Differences in Expected Outcomes When Using a Calculator That Considers Effective Lens Position and the Posterior Cornea vs One That Does Not

Elizabeth Yeu,1 Albert Y Cheung,1 Richard Potvin2 1Virginia Eye Consultants, Norfolk, VA, USA; 2Science in Vision, Akron, NY, USACorrespondence: Elizabeth YeuVirginia Eye Consultants, 241 Corporate Blvd., Norfolk, VA 23502, USATel +1 757-742-3902Email eyeulin@gmail.comPurpose: To compare toric intra...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yeu E, Cheung AY, Potvin R
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5a2ee5fdf59744148d61d0afe8f1e62d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5a2ee5fdf59744148d61d0afe8f1e62d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5a2ee5fdf59744148d61d0afe8f1e62d2021-12-02T08:31:21ZClinical Outcomes of Toric Intraocular Lenses: Differences in Expected Outcomes When Using a Calculator That Considers Effective Lens Position and the Posterior Cornea vs One That Does Not1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/5a2ee5fdf59744148d61d0afe8f1e62d2020-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/clinical-outcomes-of-toric-intraocular-lenses-differences-in-expected--peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Elizabeth Yeu,1 Albert Y Cheung,1 Richard Potvin2 1Virginia Eye Consultants, Norfolk, VA, USA; 2Science in Vision, Akron, NY, USACorrespondence: Elizabeth YeuVirginia Eye Consultants, 241 Corporate Blvd., Norfolk, VA 23502, USATel +1 757-742-3902Email eyeulin@gmail.comPurpose: To compare toric intraocular lens (IOL) outcome accuracy after using an online toric calculator that accounted for posterior corneal astigmatism versus a traditional calculator that only accounted for anterior corneal astigmatism.Patients and Methods: This was a single-arm, non-masked, non-randomized prospective study in a single private practice in Norfolk, Virginia, USA, evaluating clinical outcomes of toric IOL implantation based on a calculator that considered posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA) and effective lens position (ELP). Of interest was the distribution of the residual refraction (sphere and cylinder) at 40– 70 days postoperative. Residual refractive cylinder (RRC) was compared to the back-calculated theoretical results using a legacy calculator that did not consider PCA. Distance visual acuity (best-corrected and uncorrected) and the manifest refraction were also measured, along with preoperative and postoperative keratometry.Results: Forty-six eyes of 34 subjects were available for analysis. All eyes had a spherical equivalent refraction within 0.5D of intended. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/25 or better in 86% of eyes targeted for emmetropia. Residual cylinder was 0.50D or less in 96% of eyes, with a maximum of 0.75D measured. The difference between residual cylinder and the expected cylinder from calculations was significantly lower for the calculator that included consideration of PCA and ELP relative to the one that did not.Conclusion: Use of a toric IOL calculator that includes consideration of posterior corneal astigmatism is recommended to optimize clinical outcomes.Keywords: posterior corneal astigmatism, cylinder, residual refraction, toric calculatorYeu ECheung AYPotvin RDove Medical Pressarticleposterior corneal astigmatismcylinderresidual refractiontoric calculatorOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 14, Pp 815-822 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic posterior corneal astigmatism
cylinder
residual refraction
toric calculator
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle posterior corneal astigmatism
cylinder
residual refraction
toric calculator
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Yeu E
Cheung AY
Potvin R
Clinical Outcomes of Toric Intraocular Lenses: Differences in Expected Outcomes When Using a Calculator That Considers Effective Lens Position and the Posterior Cornea vs One That Does Not
description Elizabeth Yeu,1 Albert Y Cheung,1 Richard Potvin2 1Virginia Eye Consultants, Norfolk, VA, USA; 2Science in Vision, Akron, NY, USACorrespondence: Elizabeth YeuVirginia Eye Consultants, 241 Corporate Blvd., Norfolk, VA 23502, USATel +1 757-742-3902Email eyeulin@gmail.comPurpose: To compare toric intraocular lens (IOL) outcome accuracy after using an online toric calculator that accounted for posterior corneal astigmatism versus a traditional calculator that only accounted for anterior corneal astigmatism.Patients and Methods: This was a single-arm, non-masked, non-randomized prospective study in a single private practice in Norfolk, Virginia, USA, evaluating clinical outcomes of toric IOL implantation based on a calculator that considered posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA) and effective lens position (ELP). Of interest was the distribution of the residual refraction (sphere and cylinder) at 40– 70 days postoperative. Residual refractive cylinder (RRC) was compared to the back-calculated theoretical results using a legacy calculator that did not consider PCA. Distance visual acuity (best-corrected and uncorrected) and the manifest refraction were also measured, along with preoperative and postoperative keratometry.Results: Forty-six eyes of 34 subjects were available for analysis. All eyes had a spherical equivalent refraction within 0.5D of intended. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/25 or better in 86% of eyes targeted for emmetropia. Residual cylinder was 0.50D or less in 96% of eyes, with a maximum of 0.75D measured. The difference between residual cylinder and the expected cylinder from calculations was significantly lower for the calculator that included consideration of PCA and ELP relative to the one that did not.Conclusion: Use of a toric IOL calculator that includes consideration of posterior corneal astigmatism is recommended to optimize clinical outcomes.Keywords: posterior corneal astigmatism, cylinder, residual refraction, toric calculator
format article
author Yeu E
Cheung AY
Potvin R
author_facet Yeu E
Cheung AY
Potvin R
author_sort Yeu E
title Clinical Outcomes of Toric Intraocular Lenses: Differences in Expected Outcomes When Using a Calculator That Considers Effective Lens Position and the Posterior Cornea vs One That Does Not
title_short Clinical Outcomes of Toric Intraocular Lenses: Differences in Expected Outcomes When Using a Calculator That Considers Effective Lens Position and the Posterior Cornea vs One That Does Not
title_full Clinical Outcomes of Toric Intraocular Lenses: Differences in Expected Outcomes When Using a Calculator That Considers Effective Lens Position and the Posterior Cornea vs One That Does Not
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes of Toric Intraocular Lenses: Differences in Expected Outcomes When Using a Calculator That Considers Effective Lens Position and the Posterior Cornea vs One That Does Not
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes of Toric Intraocular Lenses: Differences in Expected Outcomes When Using a Calculator That Considers Effective Lens Position and the Posterior Cornea vs One That Does Not
title_sort clinical outcomes of toric intraocular lenses: differences in expected outcomes when using a calculator that considers effective lens position and the posterior cornea vs one that does not
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/5a2ee5fdf59744148d61d0afe8f1e62d
work_keys_str_mv AT yeue clinicaloutcomesoftoricintraocularlensesdifferencesinexpectedoutcomeswhenusingacalculatorthatconsiderseffectivelenspositionandtheposteriorcorneavsonethatdoesnot
AT cheungay clinicaloutcomesoftoricintraocularlensesdifferencesinexpectedoutcomeswhenusingacalculatorthatconsiderseffectivelenspositionandtheposteriorcorneavsonethatdoesnot
AT potvinr clinicaloutcomesoftoricintraocularlensesdifferencesinexpectedoutcomeswhenusingacalculatorthatconsiderseffectivelenspositionandtheposteriorcorneavsonethatdoesnot
_version_ 1718398485418475520