Recognising sentience in the Portuguese Civil Code

The philosophical currents arguing for the recognition that non-human animals are not mere things, as Descartes had sustained, has only just in recent years had an impact on the legal qualification of animals, with countries such as France, Germany, Austria and Switzerland recognizing that non-human...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Helena Correia Mendonça
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN ES
Publicado:	Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona. Facultat de Dret 2017
Materias:	Animal culture SF1-1100 Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/5a795ec12db44b188735a11dfcfb13a7
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:5a795ec12db44b188735a11dfcfb13a7
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:5a795ec12db44b188735a11dfcfb13a72021-11-27T08:46:19ZRecognising sentience in the Portuguese Civil Code10.5565/rev/da.122462-7518https://doaj.org/article/5a795ec12db44b188735a11dfcfb13a72017-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistes.uab.cat/da/article/view/12https://doaj.org/toc/2462-7518The philosophical currents arguing for the recognition that non-human animals are not mere things, as Descartes had sustained, has only just in recent years had an impact on the legal qualification of animals, with countries such as France, Germany, Austria and Switzerland recognizing that non-human animals are sentient beings in their national laws. The most recent country to have adopted such an amendment is Portugal, under Law n. 8/2017 of 3rd March which amended the Portuguese Civil Code. This amendment was unanimously approved by the National Parliament on 22nd of December 2016 and it has inserted a number of new provisions that intend to achieve better protection for non-human animals in the country, including a set of limitations upon the owners of animals. The present report briefly analyses the Portuguese amendment and questions whether it will bring effective improvements for the animals themselves, especially the ones subject to institutionalised use and exploitation, such as farm and laboratory animals. It is the author’s opinion that the amendment is an extremely relevant step forward not simply because it brings new provisions that can in fact represent, or at least lead to, more protection for animals, but especially because it represents a clear departure from the Cartesian philosophy that has for so long dominated the Western world and has had abhorrent impacts on the lives and well-being of non-human animals. However, when it comes to the institutionalised use of animals, the change of the legal qualification of animals has little to no impact in light of the existence of specific regimes that allow animals to be treated and slaughtered in manners that would otherwise be considered incompatible with the new status of animals. This conclusion is further confirmed by the fact that, on the same day that the amendment to the Portuguese Civil Code was approved, proposals for amending the Portuguese Criminal Code with a view to extending the criminalisation of cruelty to all animals (given that currently only acts of cruelty against companion animals are a crime in Portugal) were rejected. Hence, the symbolism represented by the new animal status cannot be seen as a full-spectrum victory for the animals themselves: it is, at the very best, a new door through which more substantial changes need to be brought, fought for and won.Helena Correia MendonçaUniversitat Autonoma de Barcelona. Facultat de DretarticleAnimal cultureSF1-1100Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. JurisprudenceK1-7720ENESDerecho Animal, Vol 8, Iss 2 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN ES
topic	Animal culture SF1-1100 Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720
spellingShingle	Animal culture SF1-1100 Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720 Helena Correia Mendonça Recognising sentience in the Portuguese Civil Code
description	The philosophical currents arguing for the recognition that non-human animals are not mere things, as Descartes had sustained, has only just in recent years had an impact on the legal qualification of animals, with countries such as France, Germany, Austria and Switzerland recognizing that non-human animals are sentient beings in their national laws. The most recent country to have adopted such an amendment is Portugal, under Law n. 8/2017 of 3rd March which amended the Portuguese Civil Code. This amendment was unanimously approved by the National Parliament on 22nd of December 2016 and it has inserted a number of new provisions that intend to achieve better protection for non-human animals in the country, including a set of limitations upon the owners of animals. The present report briefly analyses the Portuguese amendment and questions whether it will bring effective improvements for the animals themselves, especially the ones subject to institutionalised use and exploitation, such as farm and laboratory animals. It is the author’s opinion that the amendment is an extremely relevant step forward not simply because it brings new provisions that can in fact represent, or at least lead to, more protection for animals, but especially because it represents a clear departure from the Cartesian philosophy that has for so long dominated the Western world and has had abhorrent impacts on the lives and well-being of non-human animals. However, when it comes to the institutionalised use of animals, the change of the legal qualification of animals has little to no impact in light of the existence of specific regimes that allow animals to be treated and slaughtered in manners that would otherwise be considered incompatible with the new status of animals. This conclusion is further confirmed by the fact that, on the same day that the amendment to the Portuguese Civil Code was approved, proposals for amending the Portuguese Criminal Code with a view to extending the criminalisation of cruelty to all animals (given that currently only acts of cruelty against companion animals are a crime in Portugal) were rejected. Hence, the symbolism represented by the new animal status cannot be seen as a full-spectrum victory for the animals themselves: it is, at the very best, a new door through which more substantial changes need to be brought, fought for and won.
format	article
author	Helena Correia Mendonça
author_facet	Helena Correia Mendonça
author_sort	Helena Correia Mendonça
title	Recognising sentience in the Portuguese Civil Code
title_short	Recognising sentience in the Portuguese Civil Code
title_full	Recognising sentience in the Portuguese Civil Code
title_fullStr	Recognising sentience in the Portuguese Civil Code
title_full_unstemmed	Recognising sentience in the Portuguese Civil Code
title_sort	recognising sentience in the portuguese civil code
publisher	Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona. Facultat de Dret
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/5a795ec12db44b188735a11dfcfb13a7
work_keys_str_mv	AT helenacorreiamendonca recognisingsentienceintheportuguesecivilcode
_version_	1718409105577607168

Recognising sentience in the Portuguese Civil Code

Ejemplares similares