Coinage of the Cilician Cities as a Mirror of Historical and Cultural Changes (V c. BCE – III c. CE)

In antiquity Cilicia was a small but important area. The geographical setting, between the Taurus Mountains, the Mediterranean Sea and Anatolia, and the fact that territory of Cilicia was crossed by several routes connecting Anatolia with the Mediterranean sea shore and Syria determined its strateg...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Edward Dąbrowa
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
Publicado: Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5a8c9f657bc743688fec967fb4844220
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5a8c9f657bc743688fec967fb4844220
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5a8c9f657bc743688fec967fb48442202021-11-27T13:18:53ZCoinage of the Cilician Cities as a Mirror of Historical and Cultural Changes (V c. BCE – III c. CE)10.12797/SAAC.23.2019.23.061899-15482449-867Xhttps://doaj.org/article/5a8c9f657bc743688fec967fb48442202019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/saac/article/view/1111https://doaj.org/toc/1899-1548https://doaj.org/toc/2449-867X In antiquity Cilicia was a small but important area. The geographical setting, between the Taurus Mountains, the Mediterranean Sea and Anatolia, and the fact that territory of Cilicia was crossed by several routes connecting Anatolia with the Mediterranean sea shore and Syria determined its strategic significance. The geography of the area held importance for its cultural development as well. The northern part of Cilicia, Cilicia Aspera, was mountainous, sparsely populated and poorly urbanized; cities were few and located mainly on the seashore. The southern part, Cilicia Pedias, was much more prosperous and intensively urbanized. Its location made it a bridge for various cultural and religious influences coming from neighboring countries, but also an object of their expansion. Both parts of Cilicia experienced governance of many powers: Achaemenid Persia, local rulers, Hellenistic kings, and the Romans. Each of them left own political and cultural imprint on the area. Effects of this cultural mixture are clearly visible in archaeological excavations and in many types of artefacts. Another type of evidence which reflects the complicated past of Cilicia is also available: numismatic evidence. There are a few Cilician cities in which coins were minted from the Achaemenid times to the Roman Empire. This paper attempts to look into the iconography of their coinage and analyze political and religious symbols and their subjects of depiction. The aim is to find out how specific powers ruling over cities influenced local traditions, what were the remnants of those, and how they eventually evolved over time. Edward DąbrowaKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingarticleCilicianumismaticsmintsancient coinageAncient historyD51-90History of the artsNX440-632ENFRStudies in Ancient Art and Civilization, Vol 23 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
topic Cilicia
numismatics
mints
ancient coinage
Ancient history
D51-90
History of the arts
NX440-632
spellingShingle Cilicia
numismatics
mints
ancient coinage
Ancient history
D51-90
History of the arts
NX440-632
Edward Dąbrowa
Coinage of the Cilician Cities as a Mirror of Historical and Cultural Changes (V c. BCE – III c. CE)
description In antiquity Cilicia was a small but important area. The geographical setting, between the Taurus Mountains, the Mediterranean Sea and Anatolia, and the fact that territory of Cilicia was crossed by several routes connecting Anatolia with the Mediterranean sea shore and Syria determined its strategic significance. The geography of the area held importance for its cultural development as well. The northern part of Cilicia, Cilicia Aspera, was mountainous, sparsely populated and poorly urbanized; cities were few and located mainly on the seashore. The southern part, Cilicia Pedias, was much more prosperous and intensively urbanized. Its location made it a bridge for various cultural and religious influences coming from neighboring countries, but also an object of their expansion. Both parts of Cilicia experienced governance of many powers: Achaemenid Persia, local rulers, Hellenistic kings, and the Romans. Each of them left own political and cultural imprint on the area. Effects of this cultural mixture are clearly visible in archaeological excavations and in many types of artefacts. Another type of evidence which reflects the complicated past of Cilicia is also available: numismatic evidence. There are a few Cilician cities in which coins were minted from the Achaemenid times to the Roman Empire. This paper attempts to look into the iconography of their coinage and analyze political and religious symbols and their subjects of depiction. The aim is to find out how specific powers ruling over cities influenced local traditions, what were the remnants of those, and how they eventually evolved over time.
format article
author Edward Dąbrowa
author_facet Edward Dąbrowa
author_sort Edward Dąbrowa
title Coinage of the Cilician Cities as a Mirror of Historical and Cultural Changes (V c. BCE – III c. CE)
title_short Coinage of the Cilician Cities as a Mirror of Historical and Cultural Changes (V c. BCE – III c. CE)
title_full Coinage of the Cilician Cities as a Mirror of Historical and Cultural Changes (V c. BCE – III c. CE)
title_fullStr Coinage of the Cilician Cities as a Mirror of Historical and Cultural Changes (V c. BCE – III c. CE)
title_full_unstemmed Coinage of the Cilician Cities as a Mirror of Historical and Cultural Changes (V c. BCE – III c. CE)
title_sort coinage of the cilician cities as a mirror of historical and cultural changes (v c. bce – iii c. ce)
publisher Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/5a8c9f657bc743688fec967fb4844220
work_keys_str_mv AT edwarddabrowa coinageoftheciliciancitiesasamirrorofhistoricalandculturalchangesvcbceiiicce
_version_ 1718408501541208064