Validation of a modified version of the adult developmental eye movement test

Abstract This study evaluates in terms of reliability, internal consistency, and validity a modification of the Adult Developmental Eye Movement (ADEM) test, ADEM with distractors (ADEMd), designed to analyse oculomotor system, visual processing and visual attentional behaviour. 302 healthy subjects...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Andrés Gené-Sampedro, Pedro Miguel Lourenço Monteiro, Inmaculada Bueno-Gimeno, Javier Gene-Morales, David P. Piñero
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/5a9fcb62a403473dbfb9d2b64897c678
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:5a9fcb62a403473dbfb9d2b64897c678
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:5a9fcb62a403473dbfb9d2b64897c6782021-12-02T17:13:17ZValidation of a modified version of the adult developmental eye movement test10.1038/s41598-021-99245-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/5a9fcb62a403473dbfb9d2b64897c6782021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99245-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract This study evaluates in terms of reliability, internal consistency, and validity a modification of the Adult Developmental Eye Movement (ADEM) test, ADEM with distractors (ADEMd), designed to analyse oculomotor system, visual processing and visual attentional behaviour. 302 healthy subjects participated in the study (20–86 years old). Intrasession repeatability was evaluated by analysing the correlation between the time needed to read different parts of the test. Inter-session analyses were carried in 40 subjects by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients and using the Bland–Altman method. Validity was assessed in the outcomes obtained according to age as well as investigating the correlation between ADEMd and attentional useful field of vision (UFOV) test. Correlation coefficients between times need to read each sheet were ≥ 0.95 (p < 0.001). The inter-session intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.81 in the horizontal distractor sheet to 0.97 in the vertical sheet. Bland–Altman analysis showed clinically acceptable limits of agreement. Statistically significant correlations were found between age and ADEMd outcomes (r ≥ 0.55, p < 0.001). Processing velocity, divided attention and selective attention measured with the UFOV were correlated with the horizontal distractor times (r ≥ 0.32, p < 0.001). ADEMd test may be a useful clinical tool to evaluate the combined interaction of ocular movements and visual attentional behaviour.Andrés Gené-SampedroPedro Miguel Lourenço MonteiroInmaculada Bueno-GimenoJavier Gene-MoralesDavid P. PiñeroNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Andrés Gené-Sampedro Pedro Miguel Lourenço Monteiro Inmaculada Bueno-Gimeno Javier Gene-Morales David P. Piñero Validation of a modified version of the adult developmental eye movement test
description	Abstract This study evaluates in terms of reliability, internal consistency, and validity a modification of the Adult Developmental Eye Movement (ADEM) test, ADEM with distractors (ADEMd), designed to analyse oculomotor system, visual processing and visual attentional behaviour. 302 healthy subjects participated in the study (20–86 years old). Intrasession repeatability was evaluated by analysing the correlation between the time needed to read different parts of the test. Inter-session analyses were carried in 40 subjects by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients and using the Bland–Altman method. Validity was assessed in the outcomes obtained according to age as well as investigating the correlation between ADEMd and attentional useful field of vision (UFOV) test. Correlation coefficients between times need to read each sheet were ≥ 0.95 (p < 0.001). The inter-session intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.81 in the horizontal distractor sheet to 0.97 in the vertical sheet. Bland–Altman analysis showed clinically acceptable limits of agreement. Statistically significant correlations were found between age and ADEMd outcomes (r ≥ 0.55, p < 0.001). Processing velocity, divided attention and selective attention measured with the UFOV were correlated with the horizontal distractor times (r ≥ 0.32, p < 0.001). ADEMd test may be a useful clinical tool to evaluate the combined interaction of ocular movements and visual attentional behaviour.
format	article
author	Andrés Gené-Sampedro Pedro Miguel Lourenço Monteiro Inmaculada Bueno-Gimeno Javier Gene-Morales David P. Piñero
author_facet	Andrés Gené-Sampedro Pedro Miguel Lourenço Monteiro Inmaculada Bueno-Gimeno Javier Gene-Morales David P. Piñero
author_sort	Andrés Gené-Sampedro
title	Validation of a modified version of the adult developmental eye movement test
title_short	Validation of a modified version of the adult developmental eye movement test
title_full	Validation of a modified version of the adult developmental eye movement test
title_fullStr	Validation of a modified version of the adult developmental eye movement test
title_full_unstemmed	Validation of a modified version of the adult developmental eye movement test
title_sort	validation of a modified version of the adult developmental eye movement test
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/5a9fcb62a403473dbfb9d2b64897c678
work_keys_str_mv	AT andresgenesampedro validationofamodifiedversionoftheadultdevelopmentaleyemovementtest AT pedromiguellourencomonteiro validationofamodifiedversionoftheadultdevelopmentaleyemovementtest AT inmaculadabuenogimeno validationofamodifiedversionoftheadultdevelopmentaleyemovementtest AT javiergenemorales validationofamodifiedversionoftheadultdevelopmentaleyemovementtest AT davidppinero validationofamodifiedversionoftheadultdevelopmentaleyemovementtest
_version_	1718381379830415360

Validation of a modified version of the adult developmental eye movement test

Ejemplares similares