Molecular and paleontological evidence for a post-Cretaceous origin of rodents.

The timing of the origin and diversification of rodents remains controversial, due to conflicting results from molecular clocks and paleontological data. The fossil record tends to support an early Cenozoic origin of crown-group rodents. In contrast, most molecular studies place the origin and initi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaoyuan Wu, Wenyu Wu, Fuchun Zhang, Jie Ye, Xijun Ni, Jimin Sun, Scott V Edwards, Jin Meng, Chris L Organ
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5ac753a31f73499b9adb7cec31a1f377
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5ac753a31f73499b9adb7cec31a1f377
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5ac753a31f73499b9adb7cec31a1f3772021-11-18T08:13:06ZMolecular and paleontological evidence for a post-Cretaceous origin of rodents.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0046445https://doaj.org/article/5ac753a31f73499b9adb7cec31a1f3772012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23071573/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203The timing of the origin and diversification of rodents remains controversial, due to conflicting results from molecular clocks and paleontological data. The fossil record tends to support an early Cenozoic origin of crown-group rodents. In contrast, most molecular studies place the origin and initial diversification of crown-Rodentia deep in the Cretaceous, although some molecular analyses have recovered estimated divergence times that are more compatible with the fossil record. Here we attempt to resolve this conflict by carrying out a molecular clock investigation based on a nine-gene sequence dataset and a novel set of seven fossil constraints, including two new rodent records (the earliest known representatives of Cardiocraniinae and Dipodinae). Our results indicate that rodents originated around 61.7-62.4 Ma, shortly after the Cretaceous/Paleogene (K/Pg) boundary, and diversified at the intraordinal level around 57.7-58.9 Ma. These estimates are broadly consistent with the paleontological record, but challenge previous molecular studies that place the origin and early diversification of rodents in the Cretaceous. This study demonstrates that, with reliable fossil constraints, the incompatibility between paleontological and molecular estimates of rodent divergence times can be eliminated using currently available tools and genetic markers. Similar conflicts between molecular and paleontological evidence bedevil attempts to establish the origination times of other placental groups. The example of the present study suggests that more reliable fossil calibration points may represent the key to resolving these controversies.Shaoyuan WuWenyu WuFuchun ZhangJie YeXijun NiJimin SunScott V EdwardsJin MengChris L OrganPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 10, p e46445 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Shaoyuan Wu
Wenyu Wu
Fuchun Zhang
Jie Ye
Xijun Ni
Jimin Sun
Scott V Edwards
Jin Meng
Chris L Organ
Molecular and paleontological evidence for a post-Cretaceous origin of rodents.
description The timing of the origin and diversification of rodents remains controversial, due to conflicting results from molecular clocks and paleontological data. The fossil record tends to support an early Cenozoic origin of crown-group rodents. In contrast, most molecular studies place the origin and initial diversification of crown-Rodentia deep in the Cretaceous, although some molecular analyses have recovered estimated divergence times that are more compatible with the fossil record. Here we attempt to resolve this conflict by carrying out a molecular clock investigation based on a nine-gene sequence dataset and a novel set of seven fossil constraints, including two new rodent records (the earliest known representatives of Cardiocraniinae and Dipodinae). Our results indicate that rodents originated around 61.7-62.4 Ma, shortly after the Cretaceous/Paleogene (K/Pg) boundary, and diversified at the intraordinal level around 57.7-58.9 Ma. These estimates are broadly consistent with the paleontological record, but challenge previous molecular studies that place the origin and early diversification of rodents in the Cretaceous. This study demonstrates that, with reliable fossil constraints, the incompatibility between paleontological and molecular estimates of rodent divergence times can be eliminated using currently available tools and genetic markers. Similar conflicts between molecular and paleontological evidence bedevil attempts to establish the origination times of other placental groups. The example of the present study suggests that more reliable fossil calibration points may represent the key to resolving these controversies.
format article
author Shaoyuan Wu
Wenyu Wu
Fuchun Zhang
Jie Ye
Xijun Ni
Jimin Sun
Scott V Edwards
Jin Meng
Chris L Organ
author_facet Shaoyuan Wu
Wenyu Wu
Fuchun Zhang
Jie Ye
Xijun Ni
Jimin Sun
Scott V Edwards
Jin Meng
Chris L Organ
author_sort Shaoyuan Wu
title Molecular and paleontological evidence for a post-Cretaceous origin of rodents.
title_short Molecular and paleontological evidence for a post-Cretaceous origin of rodents.
title_full Molecular and paleontological evidence for a post-Cretaceous origin of rodents.
title_fullStr Molecular and paleontological evidence for a post-Cretaceous origin of rodents.
title_full_unstemmed Molecular and paleontological evidence for a post-Cretaceous origin of rodents.
title_sort molecular and paleontological evidence for a post-cretaceous origin of rodents.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/5ac753a31f73499b9adb7cec31a1f377
work_keys_str_mv AT shaoyuanwu molecularandpaleontologicalevidenceforapostcretaceousoriginofrodents
AT wenyuwu molecularandpaleontologicalevidenceforapostcretaceousoriginofrodents
AT fuchunzhang molecularandpaleontologicalevidenceforapostcretaceousoriginofrodents
AT jieye molecularandpaleontologicalevidenceforapostcretaceousoriginofrodents
AT xijunni molecularandpaleontologicalevidenceforapostcretaceousoriginofrodents
AT jiminsun molecularandpaleontologicalevidenceforapostcretaceousoriginofrodents
AT scottvedwards molecularandpaleontologicalevidenceforapostcretaceousoriginofrodents
AT jinmeng molecularandpaleontologicalevidenceforapostcretaceousoriginofrodents
AT chrislorgan molecularandpaleontologicalevidenceforapostcretaceousoriginofrodents
_version_ 1718422044098428928