Soil quality index for assessing phosphate mining restoration in a hyper-arid environment

Mining contributes significantly to economic development, but it also entails extensive environmental damage, such as soil degradation and water and air pollution. Mining activity impacts the soil quality, often making it unable to support ecosystem function and structure. The current study aims to...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nathan Levi, Noa Hillel, Eli Zaady, Guy Rotem, Yaron Ziv, Arnon Karnieli, Tarin Paz-Kagan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5afa1ea3d4f540028bbfece9e91bbee3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5afa1ea3d4f540028bbfece9e91bbee3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5afa1ea3d4f540028bbfece9e91bbee32021-12-01T04:48:18ZSoil quality index for assessing phosphate mining restoration in a hyper-arid environment1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107571https://doaj.org/article/5afa1ea3d4f540028bbfece9e91bbee32021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21002363https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XMining contributes significantly to economic development, but it also entails extensive environmental damage, such as soil degradation and water and air pollution. Mining activity impacts the soil quality, often making it unable to support ecosystem function and structure. The current study aims to apply the soil quality index (SQI) as a methodology for quantifying soil restoration status in an open-pit phosphate mine in Israel’s hyper-arid environment. In this regard, we evaluated an ecological restoration practice that includes topsoil refilling compared to the adjacent undisturbed natural system, using transformed and standardized scorings of 11 physical, biological, and chemical soil properties that were further statistically integrated into overall SQI values. Our results revealed significant differences between the restoration practice areas and the nearby natural areas, with a higher soil quality value in the latter. It is proposed that the topsoil restoration method is mainly affected by soil biological indicators, such as soil organic matter, soil proteins, and polysaccharides related to micro-organic growth, and in a lesser extent, by physical properties (primarily infiltration rate, followed by AWC). The former properties encourage the biocrust establishment, which is essential for soil surface stabilization and affects the water infiltration rate and nutrient availability. The chemical indicators showed no significant differences between most of the sites for the overall soil quality. In conclusion, soil properties, primarily physio-biological ones, should be selected to quantify and evaluate restoration practices in hyper-arid ecosystems.Nathan LeviNoa HillelEli ZaadyGuy RotemYaron ZivArnon KarnieliTarin Paz-KaganElsevierarticleEcological restorationSoil indicatorsHyper-arid ecosystemsBiocrustsEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 125, Iss , Pp 107571- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ecological restoration
Soil indicators
Hyper-arid ecosystems
Biocrusts
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Ecological restoration
Soil indicators
Hyper-arid ecosystems
Biocrusts
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Nathan Levi
Noa Hillel
Eli Zaady
Guy Rotem
Yaron Ziv
Arnon Karnieli
Tarin Paz-Kagan
Soil quality index for assessing phosphate mining restoration in a hyper-arid environment
description Mining contributes significantly to economic development, but it also entails extensive environmental damage, such as soil degradation and water and air pollution. Mining activity impacts the soil quality, often making it unable to support ecosystem function and structure. The current study aims to apply the soil quality index (SQI) as a methodology for quantifying soil restoration status in an open-pit phosphate mine in Israel’s hyper-arid environment. In this regard, we evaluated an ecological restoration practice that includes topsoil refilling compared to the adjacent undisturbed natural system, using transformed and standardized scorings of 11 physical, biological, and chemical soil properties that were further statistically integrated into overall SQI values. Our results revealed significant differences between the restoration practice areas and the nearby natural areas, with a higher soil quality value in the latter. It is proposed that the topsoil restoration method is mainly affected by soil biological indicators, such as soil organic matter, soil proteins, and polysaccharides related to micro-organic growth, and in a lesser extent, by physical properties (primarily infiltration rate, followed by AWC). The former properties encourage the biocrust establishment, which is essential for soil surface stabilization and affects the water infiltration rate and nutrient availability. The chemical indicators showed no significant differences between most of the sites for the overall soil quality. In conclusion, soil properties, primarily physio-biological ones, should be selected to quantify and evaluate restoration practices in hyper-arid ecosystems.
format article
author Nathan Levi
Noa Hillel
Eli Zaady
Guy Rotem
Yaron Ziv
Arnon Karnieli
Tarin Paz-Kagan
author_facet Nathan Levi
Noa Hillel
Eli Zaady
Guy Rotem
Yaron Ziv
Arnon Karnieli
Tarin Paz-Kagan
author_sort Nathan Levi
title Soil quality index for assessing phosphate mining restoration in a hyper-arid environment
title_short Soil quality index for assessing phosphate mining restoration in a hyper-arid environment
title_full Soil quality index for assessing phosphate mining restoration in a hyper-arid environment
title_fullStr Soil quality index for assessing phosphate mining restoration in a hyper-arid environment
title_full_unstemmed Soil quality index for assessing phosphate mining restoration in a hyper-arid environment
title_sort soil quality index for assessing phosphate mining restoration in a hyper-arid environment
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5afa1ea3d4f540028bbfece9e91bbee3
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanlevi soilqualityindexforassessingphosphateminingrestorationinahyperaridenvironment
AT noahillel soilqualityindexforassessingphosphateminingrestorationinahyperaridenvironment
AT elizaady soilqualityindexforassessingphosphateminingrestorationinahyperaridenvironment
AT guyrotem soilqualityindexforassessingphosphateminingrestorationinahyperaridenvironment
AT yaronziv soilqualityindexforassessingphosphateminingrestorationinahyperaridenvironment
AT arnonkarnieli soilqualityindexforassessingphosphateminingrestorationinahyperaridenvironment
AT tarinpazkagan soilqualityindexforassessingphosphateminingrestorationinahyperaridenvironment
_version_ 1718405724341534720