Regulatory Resistance? Narratives and Uses of Evidence around “Black Market” Provision of Gambling during the British Gambling Act Review
Commercial gambling is increasingly viewed as being part of the unhealthy commodities industries, in which products contribute to preventable ill-health globally. Britain has one of the world’s most liberal gambling markets, meaning that the regulatory changes there have implications for development...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/5b3a941abaed41eeba5953612bfe4c64 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:5b3a941abaed41eeba5953612bfe4c64 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:5b3a941abaed41eeba5953612bfe4c642021-11-11T16:40:38ZRegulatory Resistance? Narratives and Uses of Evidence around “Black Market” Provision of Gambling during the British Gambling Act Review10.3390/ijerph1821115661660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/5b3a941abaed41eeba5953612bfe4c642021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11566https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601Commercial gambling is increasingly viewed as being part of the unhealthy commodities industries, in which products contribute to preventable ill-health globally. Britain has one of the world’s most liberal gambling markets, meaning that the regulatory changes there have implications for developments elsewhere. A review of the British Gambling Act 2005 is underway. This has generated a range of actions by the industry, including mobilising arguments around the threat of the “black market”. We critically explore industry’s framing of these issues as part of their strategy to resist regulatory change during the Gambling Act review. We used a predefined review protocol to explore industry narratives about the “black market” in media reports published between 8 December 2020 and 26 May 2021. Fifty-five articles were identified and reviewed, and themes were narratively synthesised to examine industry framing of the “black market”. The black market was framed in terms of economic threat and loss, and a direct connection was made between its growth and increased regulation. The articles mainly presented gambling industry perspectives uncritically, citing industry-generated evidence (<i>n</i> = 40). Industry narratives around the “black market” speak to economically and emotionally salient concerns: fear, safety, consumer freedom and economic growth. This dominant framing in political, mainstream and industry media may influence political and public opinion to support the current status quo: “protecting” the existing regulated market rather than “protecting” people. Debates should be reframed to consider all policy options, especially those designed to protect public health.Heather WardleGerda ReithFiona DobbieAngela RintoulJeremy ShiffmanMDPI AGarticlegamblingGreat BritainGambling Act reviewblack marketunhealthy commoditiesregulationMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11566, p 11566 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
gambling Great Britain Gambling Act review black market unhealthy commodities regulation Medicine R |
spellingShingle |
gambling Great Britain Gambling Act review black market unhealthy commodities regulation Medicine R Heather Wardle Gerda Reith Fiona Dobbie Angela Rintoul Jeremy Shiffman Regulatory Resistance? Narratives and Uses of Evidence around “Black Market” Provision of Gambling during the British Gambling Act Review |
description |
Commercial gambling is increasingly viewed as being part of the unhealthy commodities industries, in which products contribute to preventable ill-health globally. Britain has one of the world’s most liberal gambling markets, meaning that the regulatory changes there have implications for developments elsewhere. A review of the British Gambling Act 2005 is underway. This has generated a range of actions by the industry, including mobilising arguments around the threat of the “black market”. We critically explore industry’s framing of these issues as part of their strategy to resist regulatory change during the Gambling Act review. We used a predefined review protocol to explore industry narratives about the “black market” in media reports published between 8 December 2020 and 26 May 2021. Fifty-five articles were identified and reviewed, and themes were narratively synthesised to examine industry framing of the “black market”. The black market was framed in terms of economic threat and loss, and a direct connection was made between its growth and increased regulation. The articles mainly presented gambling industry perspectives uncritically, citing industry-generated evidence (<i>n</i> = 40). Industry narratives around the “black market” speak to economically and emotionally salient concerns: fear, safety, consumer freedom and economic growth. This dominant framing in political, mainstream and industry media may influence political and public opinion to support the current status quo: “protecting” the existing regulated market rather than “protecting” people. Debates should be reframed to consider all policy options, especially those designed to protect public health. |
format |
article |
author |
Heather Wardle Gerda Reith Fiona Dobbie Angela Rintoul Jeremy Shiffman |
author_facet |
Heather Wardle Gerda Reith Fiona Dobbie Angela Rintoul Jeremy Shiffman |
author_sort |
Heather Wardle |
title |
Regulatory Resistance? Narratives and Uses of Evidence around “Black Market” Provision of Gambling during the British Gambling Act Review |
title_short |
Regulatory Resistance? Narratives and Uses of Evidence around “Black Market” Provision of Gambling during the British Gambling Act Review |
title_full |
Regulatory Resistance? Narratives and Uses of Evidence around “Black Market” Provision of Gambling during the British Gambling Act Review |
title_fullStr |
Regulatory Resistance? Narratives and Uses of Evidence around “Black Market” Provision of Gambling during the British Gambling Act Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Regulatory Resistance? Narratives and Uses of Evidence around “Black Market” Provision of Gambling during the British Gambling Act Review |
title_sort |
regulatory resistance? narratives and uses of evidence around “black market” provision of gambling during the british gambling act review |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/5b3a941abaed41eeba5953612bfe4c64 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT heatherwardle regulatoryresistancenarrativesandusesofevidencearoundblackmarketprovisionofgamblingduringthebritishgamblingactreview AT gerdareith regulatoryresistancenarrativesandusesofevidencearoundblackmarketprovisionofgamblingduringthebritishgamblingactreview AT fionadobbie regulatoryresistancenarrativesandusesofevidencearoundblackmarketprovisionofgamblingduringthebritishgamblingactreview AT angelarintoul regulatoryresistancenarrativesandusesofevidencearoundblackmarketprovisionofgamblingduringthebritishgamblingactreview AT jeremyshiffman regulatoryresistancenarrativesandusesofevidencearoundblackmarketprovisionofgamblingduringthebritishgamblingactreview |
_version_ |
1718432239929262080 |