Computerized assessment of pain drawing area: A pilot study

Anna Wenngren, Britt-Marie StålnackeDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, SwedenAim: To investigate if pain area in patients with chronic pain could be measured by a computerized assessment on previously marked pain drawings on paper figure...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anna Wenngren, Britt-Marie Stålnacke
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5b809606ca3749ad8045da416716f77c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5b809606ca3749ad8045da416716f77c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5b809606ca3749ad8045da416716f77c2021-12-02T05:17:02ZComputerized assessment of pain drawing area: A pilot study1176-63281178-2021https://doaj.org/article/5b809606ca3749ad8045da416716f77c2009-08-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/computerized-assessment-of-pain-drawing-area-a-pilot-study-a3469https://doaj.org/toc/1176-6328https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2021Anna Wenngren, Britt-Marie StålnackeDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, SwedenAim: To investigate if pain area in patients with chronic pain could be measured by a computerized assessment on previously marked pain drawings on paper figures and to analyze the further application of the method.Methods: Seventy-two patients (54 women and 18 men) who were admitted to Umeå University Hospital during 2003 for assessment of chronic pain answered a set of questionnaires (pain intensity on the visual analog scale [VAS], disability on the Disability Rating Index [DRI], life satisfaction on the LiSat-11) and filled in pain drawings on paper figures of the human body. The pain drawings were later analyzed by using computerized assessment.Results: Women marked a greater pain area than men, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.433). No significant difference was shown for the previous seven days between men and women on the VAS (p = 0.914), DRI (p = 0.493), or LiSat-11 (p = 0.124). A statistically significant correlation was found between pain area and VAS for the previous seven days (r = 0.250; p = 0.046). Pain area was statistically significantly correlated to the DRI (r = 0.336; p = 0.014) and close to negatively correlated to the LiSat-11 (r = -0.687; p = 0.057).Conclusion: This pilot study shows that pain drawing area could be measured by a computerized assessment of pain drawings. The method points to the possibility of relating pain area with other instruments. In the present study, an association between the patients’ pain drawing area and pain intensity and between pain area and level of activity was shown.Keywords: musculoskeletal pain, screening, pain drawing, computerized assessment Anna WenngrenBritt-Marie StålnackeDove Medical PressarticleNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571Neurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Vol 2009, Iss default, Pp 451-456 (2009)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Anna Wenngren
Britt-Marie Stålnacke
Computerized assessment of pain drawing area: A pilot study
description Anna Wenngren, Britt-Marie StålnackeDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, SwedenAim: To investigate if pain area in patients with chronic pain could be measured by a computerized assessment on previously marked pain drawings on paper figures and to analyze the further application of the method.Methods: Seventy-two patients (54 women and 18 men) who were admitted to Umeå University Hospital during 2003 for assessment of chronic pain answered a set of questionnaires (pain intensity on the visual analog scale [VAS], disability on the Disability Rating Index [DRI], life satisfaction on the LiSat-11) and filled in pain drawings on paper figures of the human body. The pain drawings were later analyzed by using computerized assessment.Results: Women marked a greater pain area than men, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.433). No significant difference was shown for the previous seven days between men and women on the VAS (p = 0.914), DRI (p = 0.493), or LiSat-11 (p = 0.124). A statistically significant correlation was found between pain area and VAS for the previous seven days (r = 0.250; p = 0.046). Pain area was statistically significantly correlated to the DRI (r = 0.336; p = 0.014) and close to negatively correlated to the LiSat-11 (r = -0.687; p = 0.057).Conclusion: This pilot study shows that pain drawing area could be measured by a computerized assessment of pain drawings. The method points to the possibility of relating pain area with other instruments. In the present study, an association between the patients’ pain drawing area and pain intensity and between pain area and level of activity was shown.Keywords: musculoskeletal pain, screening, pain drawing, computerized assessment
format article
author Anna Wenngren
Britt-Marie Stålnacke
author_facet Anna Wenngren
Britt-Marie Stålnacke
author_sort Anna Wenngren
title Computerized assessment of pain drawing area: A pilot study
title_short Computerized assessment of pain drawing area: A pilot study
title_full Computerized assessment of pain drawing area: A pilot study
title_fullStr Computerized assessment of pain drawing area: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Computerized assessment of pain drawing area: A pilot study
title_sort computerized assessment of pain drawing area: a pilot study
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2009
url https://doaj.org/article/5b809606ca3749ad8045da416716f77c
work_keys_str_mv AT annawenngren computerizedassessmentofpaindrawingareaapilotstudy
AT brittmariestamparinglnacke computerizedassessmentofpaindrawingareaapilotstudy
_version_ 1718400470879305728