Exploring the Relationship Between L2 Listening and Metacognition after Controlling for Vocabulary Knowledge

Metacognition is known to be important for L2 listening comprehension. However, it is unclear how much variance in listening performance it can explain after controlling for vocabulary knowledge. To examine this, data from the listening section of the TOEFL Junior test, the Metacognitive Awareness L...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Matthew P. Wallace
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: National Research University Higher School of Economics 2021
Materias:
L
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.12685
https://doaj.org/article/5b897318213042fb96604ef159447660
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5b897318213042fb96604ef159447660
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5b897318213042fb96604ef1594476602021-11-21T16:04:19Z Exploring the Relationship Between L2 Listening and Metacognition after Controlling for Vocabulary Knowledgehttps://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.126852411-7390https://doaj.org/article/5b897318213042fb96604ef1594476602021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jle.hse.ru/article/view/12685/13156https://doaj.org/toc/2411-7390Metacognition is known to be important for L2 listening comprehension. However, it is unclear how much variance in listening performance it can explain after controlling for vocabulary knowledge. To examine this, data from the listening section of the TOEFL Junior test, the Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ), and the Listening Vocabulary Levels Test were collected from 76 high school EFL learners in Japan. The MALQ measured five subscales of metacognition representing metacognitive skills and metacognitive knowledge. Representing skills, the MALQ measured perceptions of the ability to (1) plan and evaluate performance, (2) direct attention, and (3) overcome listening problems. Representing knowledge, it measured strategic knowledge of (4) avoiding mentally translating speech and person knowledge of (5) maintaining positive attitudes about listening. The descriptive results showed that participants used their metacognition moderately. Of the subscales, they directed attention the most, planned and evaluated performance least, and perceived their ability to avoid mental translation, solve problems, and maintain optimism equivalently. The results from the hierarchical regression analysis further showed that vocabulary knowledge and metacognition overall predicted listening performance. Of the MALQ subscales, only person knowledge predicted comprehension. These findings indicate that, contrary to earlier findings, metacognition was important for listening comprehension after accounting for vocabulary knowledge.Matthew P. WallaceNational Research University Higher School of Economicsarticlesecond language listening comprehensionmetacognitionvocabulary knowledgeindividual differenceshierarchical regressionEducationLPhilology. LinguisticsP1-1091ENJournal of Language and Education, Vol 7, Iss 3, Pp 187-200 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic second language listening comprehension
metacognition
vocabulary knowledge
individual differences
hierarchical regression
Education
L
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
spellingShingle second language listening comprehension
metacognition
vocabulary knowledge
individual differences
hierarchical regression
Education
L
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Matthew P. Wallace
Exploring the Relationship Between L2 Listening and Metacognition after Controlling for Vocabulary Knowledge
description Metacognition is known to be important for L2 listening comprehension. However, it is unclear how much variance in listening performance it can explain after controlling for vocabulary knowledge. To examine this, data from the listening section of the TOEFL Junior test, the Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ), and the Listening Vocabulary Levels Test were collected from 76 high school EFL learners in Japan. The MALQ measured five subscales of metacognition representing metacognitive skills and metacognitive knowledge. Representing skills, the MALQ measured perceptions of the ability to (1) plan and evaluate performance, (2) direct attention, and (3) overcome listening problems. Representing knowledge, it measured strategic knowledge of (4) avoiding mentally translating speech and person knowledge of (5) maintaining positive attitudes about listening. The descriptive results showed that participants used their metacognition moderately. Of the subscales, they directed attention the most, planned and evaluated performance least, and perceived their ability to avoid mental translation, solve problems, and maintain optimism equivalently. The results from the hierarchical regression analysis further showed that vocabulary knowledge and metacognition overall predicted listening performance. Of the MALQ subscales, only person knowledge predicted comprehension. These findings indicate that, contrary to earlier findings, metacognition was important for listening comprehension after accounting for vocabulary knowledge.
format article
author Matthew P. Wallace
author_facet Matthew P. Wallace
author_sort Matthew P. Wallace
title Exploring the Relationship Between L2 Listening and Metacognition after Controlling for Vocabulary Knowledge
title_short Exploring the Relationship Between L2 Listening and Metacognition after Controlling for Vocabulary Knowledge
title_full Exploring the Relationship Between L2 Listening and Metacognition after Controlling for Vocabulary Knowledge
title_fullStr Exploring the Relationship Between L2 Listening and Metacognition after Controlling for Vocabulary Knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Relationship Between L2 Listening and Metacognition after Controlling for Vocabulary Knowledge
title_sort exploring the relationship between l2 listening and metacognition after controlling for vocabulary knowledge
publisher National Research University Higher School of Economics
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.12685
https://doaj.org/article/5b897318213042fb96604ef159447660
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewpwallace exploringtherelationshipbetweenl2listeningandmetacognitionaftercontrollingforvocabularyknowledge
_version_ 1718418703008137216