Distinct Effects of Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib on Mouse Atrial and Sinoatrial Node Electrophysiology and Arrhythmogenesis

Background Ibrutinib and acalabrutinib are Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in the treatment of B‐cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Ibrutinib is associated with new‐onset atrial fibrillation. Cases of sinus bradycardia and sinus arrest have also been reported following ibrutinib treatment. C...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jari M. Tuomi, Loryn J. Bohne, Tristan W. Dorey, Hailey J. Jansen, Yingjie Liu, Douglas L. Jones, Robert A. Rose
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5b8c21de6e6247fe86ccf4e7765fb41d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5b8c21de6e6247fe86ccf4e7765fb41d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5b8c21de6e6247fe86ccf4e7765fb41d2021-11-16T10:22:43ZDistinct Effects of Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib on Mouse Atrial and Sinoatrial Node Electrophysiology and Arrhythmogenesis10.1161/JAHA.121.0223692047-9980https://doaj.org/article/5b8c21de6e6247fe86ccf4e7765fb41d2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.022369https://doaj.org/toc/2047-9980Background Ibrutinib and acalabrutinib are Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in the treatment of B‐cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Ibrutinib is associated with new‐onset atrial fibrillation. Cases of sinus bradycardia and sinus arrest have also been reported following ibrutinib treatment. Conversely, acalabrutinib is less arrhythmogenic. The basis for these different effects is unclear. Methods and Results The effects of ibrutinib and acalabrutinib on atrial electrophysiology were investigated in anesthetized mice using intracardiac electrophysiology, in isolated atrial preparations using high‐resolution optical mapping, and in isolated atrial and sinoatrial node (SAN) myocytes using patch‐clamping. Acute delivery of acalabrutinib did not affect atrial fibrillation susceptibility or other measures of atrial electrophysiology in mice in vivo. Optical mapping demonstrates that ibrutinib dose‐dependently impaired atrial and SAN conduction and slowed beating rate. Acalabrutinib had no effect on atrial and SAN conduction or beating rate. In isolated atrial myocytes, ibrutinib reduced action potential upstroke velocity and Na+ current. In contrast, acalabrutinib had no effects on atrial myocyte upstroke velocity or Na+ current. Both drugs increased action potential duration, but these effects were smaller for acalabrutinib compared with ibrutinib and occurred by different mechanisms. In SAN myocytes, ibrutinib impaired spontaneous action potential firing by inhibiting the delayed rectifier K+ current, while acalabrutinib had no effects on SAN myocyte action potential firing. Conclusions Ibrutinib and acalabrutinib have distinct effects on atrial electrophysiology and ion channel function that provide insight into the basis for increased atrial fibrillation susceptibility and SAN dysfunction with ibrutinib, but not with acalabrutinib.Jari M. TuomiLoryn J. BohneTristan W. DoreyHailey J. JansenYingjie LiuDouglas L. JonesRobert A. RoseWileyarticleacalabrutinibatrial fibrillationibrutinibion channelssinoatrial nodeDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemRC666-701ENJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, Vol 10, Iss 22 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic acalabrutinib
atrial fibrillation
ibrutinib
ion channels
sinoatrial node
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
spellingShingle acalabrutinib
atrial fibrillation
ibrutinib
ion channels
sinoatrial node
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
Jari M. Tuomi
Loryn J. Bohne
Tristan W. Dorey
Hailey J. Jansen
Yingjie Liu
Douglas L. Jones
Robert A. Rose
Distinct Effects of Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib on Mouse Atrial and Sinoatrial Node Electrophysiology and Arrhythmogenesis
description Background Ibrutinib and acalabrutinib are Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in the treatment of B‐cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Ibrutinib is associated with new‐onset atrial fibrillation. Cases of sinus bradycardia and sinus arrest have also been reported following ibrutinib treatment. Conversely, acalabrutinib is less arrhythmogenic. The basis for these different effects is unclear. Methods and Results The effects of ibrutinib and acalabrutinib on atrial electrophysiology were investigated in anesthetized mice using intracardiac electrophysiology, in isolated atrial preparations using high‐resolution optical mapping, and in isolated atrial and sinoatrial node (SAN) myocytes using patch‐clamping. Acute delivery of acalabrutinib did not affect atrial fibrillation susceptibility or other measures of atrial electrophysiology in mice in vivo. Optical mapping demonstrates that ibrutinib dose‐dependently impaired atrial and SAN conduction and slowed beating rate. Acalabrutinib had no effect on atrial and SAN conduction or beating rate. In isolated atrial myocytes, ibrutinib reduced action potential upstroke velocity and Na+ current. In contrast, acalabrutinib had no effects on atrial myocyte upstroke velocity or Na+ current. Both drugs increased action potential duration, but these effects were smaller for acalabrutinib compared with ibrutinib and occurred by different mechanisms. In SAN myocytes, ibrutinib impaired spontaneous action potential firing by inhibiting the delayed rectifier K+ current, while acalabrutinib had no effects on SAN myocyte action potential firing. Conclusions Ibrutinib and acalabrutinib have distinct effects on atrial electrophysiology and ion channel function that provide insight into the basis for increased atrial fibrillation susceptibility and SAN dysfunction with ibrutinib, but not with acalabrutinib.
format article
author Jari M. Tuomi
Loryn J. Bohne
Tristan W. Dorey
Hailey J. Jansen
Yingjie Liu
Douglas L. Jones
Robert A. Rose
author_facet Jari M. Tuomi
Loryn J. Bohne
Tristan W. Dorey
Hailey J. Jansen
Yingjie Liu
Douglas L. Jones
Robert A. Rose
author_sort Jari M. Tuomi
title Distinct Effects of Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib on Mouse Atrial and Sinoatrial Node Electrophysiology and Arrhythmogenesis
title_short Distinct Effects of Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib on Mouse Atrial and Sinoatrial Node Electrophysiology and Arrhythmogenesis
title_full Distinct Effects of Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib on Mouse Atrial and Sinoatrial Node Electrophysiology and Arrhythmogenesis
title_fullStr Distinct Effects of Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib on Mouse Atrial and Sinoatrial Node Electrophysiology and Arrhythmogenesis
title_full_unstemmed Distinct Effects of Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib on Mouse Atrial and Sinoatrial Node Electrophysiology and Arrhythmogenesis
title_sort distinct effects of ibrutinib and acalabrutinib on mouse atrial and sinoatrial node electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5b8c21de6e6247fe86ccf4e7765fb41d
work_keys_str_mv AT jarimtuomi distincteffectsofibrutinibandacalabrutinibonmouseatrialandsinoatrialnodeelectrophysiologyandarrhythmogenesis
AT lorynjbohne distincteffectsofibrutinibandacalabrutinibonmouseatrialandsinoatrialnodeelectrophysiologyandarrhythmogenesis
AT tristanwdorey distincteffectsofibrutinibandacalabrutinibonmouseatrialandsinoatrialnodeelectrophysiologyandarrhythmogenesis
AT haileyjjansen distincteffectsofibrutinibandacalabrutinibonmouseatrialandsinoatrialnodeelectrophysiologyandarrhythmogenesis
AT yingjieliu distincteffectsofibrutinibandacalabrutinibonmouseatrialandsinoatrialnodeelectrophysiologyandarrhythmogenesis
AT douglasljones distincteffectsofibrutinibandacalabrutinibonmouseatrialandsinoatrialnodeelectrophysiologyandarrhythmogenesis
AT robertarose distincteffectsofibrutinibandacalabrutinibonmouseatrialandsinoatrialnodeelectrophysiologyandarrhythmogenesis
_version_ 1718426548591132672