A novel method for liquid-phase extraction of cell-free DNA for detection of circulating tumor DNA
Abstract Low yields of extracted cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma limit continued development of liquid biopsy in cancer, especially in early-stage cancer diagnostics and cancer screening applications. We investigate a novel liquid-phase-based DNA isolation method that utilizes aqueous two-phase sy...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/5b8e5b31d9594c7e8e04f5fa388234cc |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:5b8e5b31d9594c7e8e04f5fa388234cc |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:5b8e5b31d9594c7e8e04f5fa388234cc2021-12-02T18:07:52ZA novel method for liquid-phase extraction of cell-free DNA for detection of circulating tumor DNA10.1038/s41598-021-98815-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/5b8e5b31d9594c7e8e04f5fa388234cc2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98815-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Low yields of extracted cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma limit continued development of liquid biopsy in cancer, especially in early-stage cancer diagnostics and cancer screening applications. We investigate a novel liquid-phase-based DNA isolation method that utilizes aqueous two-phase systems to purify and concentrate circulating cfDNA. The PHASIFY MAX and PHASIFY ENRICH kits were compared to a commonly employed solid-phase extraction method on their ability to extract cfDNA from a set of 91 frozen plasma samples from cancer patients. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used as the downstream diagnostic to detect mutant copies. Compared to the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid (QCNA) kit, the PHASIFY MAX method demonstrated 60% increase in DNA yield and 171% increase in mutant copy recovery, and the PHASIFY ENRICH kit demonstrated a 35% decrease in DNA yield with a 153% increase in mutant copy recovery. A follow-up study with PHASIFY ENRICH resulted in the positive conversion of 9 out of 47 plasma samples previously determined negative with QCNA extraction (all with known positive tissue genotyping). Our results indicate that this novel extraction technique offers higher cfDNA recovery resulting in better sensitivity for detection of cfDNA mutations compared to a commonly used solid-phase extraction method.Filip JankuHelen J. HuangDavid Y. PereiraMasae KobayashiChung Hei ChiuS. Greg CallKristen T. WoodburyFelix ChaoDaniel R. MarshakRicky Y. T. ChiuNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Filip Janku Helen J. Huang David Y. Pereira Masae Kobayashi Chung Hei Chiu S. Greg Call Kristen T. Woodbury Felix Chao Daniel R. Marshak Ricky Y. T. Chiu A novel method for liquid-phase extraction of cell-free DNA for detection of circulating tumor DNA |
description |
Abstract Low yields of extracted cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma limit continued development of liquid biopsy in cancer, especially in early-stage cancer diagnostics and cancer screening applications. We investigate a novel liquid-phase-based DNA isolation method that utilizes aqueous two-phase systems to purify and concentrate circulating cfDNA. The PHASIFY MAX and PHASIFY ENRICH kits were compared to a commonly employed solid-phase extraction method on their ability to extract cfDNA from a set of 91 frozen plasma samples from cancer patients. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used as the downstream diagnostic to detect mutant copies. Compared to the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid (QCNA) kit, the PHASIFY MAX method demonstrated 60% increase in DNA yield and 171% increase in mutant copy recovery, and the PHASIFY ENRICH kit demonstrated a 35% decrease in DNA yield with a 153% increase in mutant copy recovery. A follow-up study with PHASIFY ENRICH resulted in the positive conversion of 9 out of 47 plasma samples previously determined negative with QCNA extraction (all with known positive tissue genotyping). Our results indicate that this novel extraction technique offers higher cfDNA recovery resulting in better sensitivity for detection of cfDNA mutations compared to a commonly used solid-phase extraction method. |
format |
article |
author |
Filip Janku Helen J. Huang David Y. Pereira Masae Kobayashi Chung Hei Chiu S. Greg Call Kristen T. Woodbury Felix Chao Daniel R. Marshak Ricky Y. T. Chiu |
author_facet |
Filip Janku Helen J. Huang David Y. Pereira Masae Kobayashi Chung Hei Chiu S. Greg Call Kristen T. Woodbury Felix Chao Daniel R. Marshak Ricky Y. T. Chiu |
author_sort |
Filip Janku |
title |
A novel method for liquid-phase extraction of cell-free DNA for detection of circulating tumor DNA |
title_short |
A novel method for liquid-phase extraction of cell-free DNA for detection of circulating tumor DNA |
title_full |
A novel method for liquid-phase extraction of cell-free DNA for detection of circulating tumor DNA |
title_fullStr |
A novel method for liquid-phase extraction of cell-free DNA for detection of circulating tumor DNA |
title_full_unstemmed |
A novel method for liquid-phase extraction of cell-free DNA for detection of circulating tumor DNA |
title_sort |
novel method for liquid-phase extraction of cell-free dna for detection of circulating tumor dna |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/5b8e5b31d9594c7e8e04f5fa388234cc |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT filipjanku anovelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT helenjhuang anovelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT davidypereira anovelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT masaekobayashi anovelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT chungheichiu anovelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT sgregcall anovelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT kristentwoodbury anovelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT felixchao anovelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT danielrmarshak anovelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT rickyytchiu anovelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT filipjanku novelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT helenjhuang novelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT davidypereira novelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT masaekobayashi novelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT chungheichiu novelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT sgregcall novelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT kristentwoodbury novelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT felixchao novelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT danielrmarshak novelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna AT rickyytchiu novelmethodforliquidphaseextractionofcellfreednafordetectionofcirculatingtumordna |
_version_ |
1718378629600116736 |