A Department-of-Anesthesiology-based management protocol for perioperative corneal abrasions

Jessica R Lichter,1 Lawrence B Marr,2 Dennis E Schilling,3 Mark E Hudson,4 Robert H Boretsky,5 Roxana F Barad,6 Jacques E Chelly1–3 1Division of Clinical Research, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh, 2University of Pittsburgh Physicians, Department of Anesthesiology, U...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lichter JR, Marr LB, Schilling DE, Hudson ME, Boretsky RH, Barad RF, Chelly JE
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5bcb97f3552943efae0030f31ee31fea
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5bcb97f3552943efae0030f31ee31fea
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5bcb97f3552943efae0030f31ee31fea2021-12-02T06:57:54ZA Department-of-Anesthesiology-based management protocol for perioperative corneal abrasions1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/5bcb97f3552943efae0030f31ee31fea2015-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/a-department-of-anesthesiology-based-management-protocol-for-periopera-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Jessica R Lichter,1 Lawrence B Marr,2 Dennis E Schilling,3 Mark E Hudson,4 Robert H Boretsky,5 Roxana F Barad,6 Jacques E Chelly1–3 1Division of Clinical Research, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh, 2University of Pittsburgh Physicians, Department of Anesthesiology, UPMC Shadyside Hospital, 3UPMC Shadyside Hospital, 4University of Pittsburgh Physicians, Department of Anesthesiolgy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5Department of Anesthesiology, UPMC Shadyside, 6Department of Ophthalmology, UPMC Shadyside, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Introduction: Corneal abrasions (CAs) are the most prevalent ocular injuries in the perioperative period. Previously, patients at our community hospital would wait for an ophthalmologist to be available to manage these minor injuries. To decrease this waiting period – and thereby increase patient satisfaction – we developed an anesthesiology-based protocol to manage minor CAs arising in the recovery room. The current study sought to assess this protocol’s efficacy as well as further establish the incidence and some risk factors of CA. Methods: This was a hospital-based, observational study. As per protocol, anesthesiologists saw and diagnosed any patient exhibiting symptoms of CA, after which they initiated a preestablished treatment regimen. To examine the efficacy of this protocol between March 2007 and December 2011, the number of CAs anesthesiologists managed and time to treatment were recorded. Additionally, the frequency of CAs was established along with some of their risk factors. Results: Throughout the study period, there were 91,064 surgical cases, with 118 CAs (0.13% incidence). Anesthesiology alone managed 110 (93.22%) of these cases. The median time between the end of anesthesia to the time of prescribed ophthalmic medication was 156 minutes (first–third interquartile range: 108–219). All patients experienced resolution of symptoms by the morning following their complaint. Compared to the general surgical population, CA patients were older (P<0.01) and underwent longer surgeries (P<0.01). Conclusion: Minor CAs can be safely and effectively managed using an anesthesiology-based approach. Advanced age and longer surgery are confirmed as risk factors for these injuries. Keywords: corneal injuries, clinical protocols, patient care management, perioperative complicationsLichter JRMarr LBSchilling DEHudson MEBoretsky RHBarad RFChelly JEDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2015, Iss default, Pp 1689-1695 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Lichter JR
Marr LB
Schilling DE
Hudson ME
Boretsky RH
Barad RF
Chelly JE
A Department-of-Anesthesiology-based management protocol for perioperative corneal abrasions
description Jessica R Lichter,1 Lawrence B Marr,2 Dennis E Schilling,3 Mark E Hudson,4 Robert H Boretsky,5 Roxana F Barad,6 Jacques E Chelly1–3 1Division of Clinical Research, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh, 2University of Pittsburgh Physicians, Department of Anesthesiology, UPMC Shadyside Hospital, 3UPMC Shadyside Hospital, 4University of Pittsburgh Physicians, Department of Anesthesiolgy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5Department of Anesthesiology, UPMC Shadyside, 6Department of Ophthalmology, UPMC Shadyside, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Introduction: Corneal abrasions (CAs) are the most prevalent ocular injuries in the perioperative period. Previously, patients at our community hospital would wait for an ophthalmologist to be available to manage these minor injuries. To decrease this waiting period – and thereby increase patient satisfaction – we developed an anesthesiology-based protocol to manage minor CAs arising in the recovery room. The current study sought to assess this protocol’s efficacy as well as further establish the incidence and some risk factors of CA. Methods: This was a hospital-based, observational study. As per protocol, anesthesiologists saw and diagnosed any patient exhibiting symptoms of CA, after which they initiated a preestablished treatment regimen. To examine the efficacy of this protocol between March 2007 and December 2011, the number of CAs anesthesiologists managed and time to treatment were recorded. Additionally, the frequency of CAs was established along with some of their risk factors. Results: Throughout the study period, there were 91,064 surgical cases, with 118 CAs (0.13% incidence). Anesthesiology alone managed 110 (93.22%) of these cases. The median time between the end of anesthesia to the time of prescribed ophthalmic medication was 156 minutes (first–third interquartile range: 108–219). All patients experienced resolution of symptoms by the morning following their complaint. Compared to the general surgical population, CA patients were older (P<0.01) and underwent longer surgeries (P<0.01). Conclusion: Minor CAs can be safely and effectively managed using an anesthesiology-based approach. Advanced age and longer surgery are confirmed as risk factors for these injuries. Keywords: corneal injuries, clinical protocols, patient care management, perioperative complications
format article
author Lichter JR
Marr LB
Schilling DE
Hudson ME
Boretsky RH
Barad RF
Chelly JE
author_facet Lichter JR
Marr LB
Schilling DE
Hudson ME
Boretsky RH
Barad RF
Chelly JE
author_sort Lichter JR
title A Department-of-Anesthesiology-based management protocol for perioperative corneal abrasions
title_short A Department-of-Anesthesiology-based management protocol for perioperative corneal abrasions
title_full A Department-of-Anesthesiology-based management protocol for perioperative corneal abrasions
title_fullStr A Department-of-Anesthesiology-based management protocol for perioperative corneal abrasions
title_full_unstemmed A Department-of-Anesthesiology-based management protocol for perioperative corneal abrasions
title_sort department-of-anesthesiology-based management protocol for perioperative corneal abrasions
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/5bcb97f3552943efae0030f31ee31fea
work_keys_str_mv AT lichterjr adepartmentofanesthesiologybasedmanagementprotocolforperioperativecornealnbspabrasions
AT marrlb adepartmentofanesthesiologybasedmanagementprotocolforperioperativecornealnbspabrasions
AT schillingde adepartmentofanesthesiologybasedmanagementprotocolforperioperativecornealnbspabrasions
AT hudsonme adepartmentofanesthesiologybasedmanagementprotocolforperioperativecornealnbspabrasions
AT boretskyrh adepartmentofanesthesiologybasedmanagementprotocolforperioperativecornealnbspabrasions
AT baradrf adepartmentofanesthesiologybasedmanagementprotocolforperioperativecornealnbspabrasions
AT chellyje adepartmentofanesthesiologybasedmanagementprotocolforperioperativecornealnbspabrasions
AT lichterjr departmentofanesthesiologybasedmanagementprotocolforperioperativecornealnbspabrasions
AT marrlb departmentofanesthesiologybasedmanagementprotocolforperioperativecornealnbspabrasions
AT schillingde departmentofanesthesiologybasedmanagementprotocolforperioperativecornealnbspabrasions
AT hudsonme departmentofanesthesiologybasedmanagementprotocolforperioperativecornealnbspabrasions
AT boretskyrh departmentofanesthesiologybasedmanagementprotocolforperioperativecornealnbspabrasions
AT baradrf departmentofanesthesiologybasedmanagementprotocolforperioperativecornealnbspabrasions
AT chellyje departmentofanesthesiologybasedmanagementprotocolforperioperativecornealnbspabrasions
_version_ 1718399633684692992