The Effects of Soft Tissue Flossing on Hamstring Range of Motion and Lower Extremity Power

# Background Flossing includes wrapping a specialized latex band around a muscle group providing compression, partially occluding blood flow, followed by performing exercises. This is hypothesized to improve flexibility by dissipating myofascial adhesions; however, research is lacking. # Objectiv...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zachary Maust, Debbie Bradney, Sean M Collins, Caroline Wesley, Thomas G Bowman
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: North American Sports Medicine Institute 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5be92557712d4b0c81404912f7d7c66c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5be92557712d4b0c81404912f7d7c66c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5be92557712d4b0c81404912f7d7c66c2021-12-02T16:01:45ZThe Effects of Soft Tissue Flossing on Hamstring Range of Motion and Lower Extremity Power10.26603/001c.241442159-2896https://doaj.org/article/5be92557712d4b0c81404912f7d7c66c2021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ijspt.scholasticahq.com/article/24144-the-effects-of-soft-tissue-flossing-on-hamstring-range-of-motion-and-lower-extremity-power.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2159-2896# Background Flossing includes wrapping a specialized latex band around a muscle group providing compression, partially occluding blood flow, followed by performing exercises. This is hypothesized to improve flexibility by dissipating myofascial adhesions; however, research is lacking. # Objective To determine the effect of the application of a floss band to the thigh on hamstring flexibility and lower extremity power. # Design Crossover Study # Setting Exercise Physiology Laboratory. # Participants Twenty-one recreationally active individuals (8 male, 13 female; age = 22.62±2.99 years; height = 171.52±9.08 cm; mass = 73.57±11.37 kg). # Methods Three counterbalanced interventions were studied during body weight squats, lunges, and hamstring curls (without resistance): floss, sham, and control. The floss treatment included wrapping the Rogue Wide Voodoo Floss Band™ from the proximal knee to the gluteal fold at a pressure of 140 to 200 mmHg. The sham treatment included wrapping the same band in the same location with less pressure (10 to 40 mmHg) while the control treatment did not include floss band application. Hip flexion range of motion, via the straight leg raise, and power (single-leg vertical jump) were compared from pre-test to post-test using a 3x2 repeated measures ANOVA. # Results There was a significant interaction between time and session for hamstring flexibility (F~(2,40)~=17.54, *p*<0.001, η^2^=0.47). Post hoc tests showed significant differences between pre- (86.14±8.06 degrees) and post-test (90.81±7.69 degrees) for the floss session (*p*<0.001, Mean Difference=4.67, CI~95~=3.35-5.98) and between pre- (87.67±7.51 degrees) and post-test (89.86±7.88 degrees) for the sham session (*p*=0.001, Mean Difference=2.19, CI~95~=0.98-3.40). There were no significant interactions for jump power (F~(2,40)~=1.82, *P*=0.18, η^2^=0.08, 1-β=0.36). # Conclusions Flossing treatment increased hamstring flexibility more than the sham session without affecting lower body power. Flossing could be beneficial when treatment or performance preparation goals are increased flexibility without decreased power. Future studies should continue to examine the clinical effectiveness of flossing on an injured population.Zachary MaustDebbie BradneySean M CollinsCaroline WesleyThomas G BowmanNorth American Sports Medicine InstitutearticleSports medicineRC1200-1245ENInternational Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, Vol 16, Iss 3 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Sports medicine
RC1200-1245
spellingShingle Sports medicine
RC1200-1245
Zachary Maust
Debbie Bradney
Sean M Collins
Caroline Wesley
Thomas G Bowman
The Effects of Soft Tissue Flossing on Hamstring Range of Motion and Lower Extremity Power
description # Background Flossing includes wrapping a specialized latex band around a muscle group providing compression, partially occluding blood flow, followed by performing exercises. This is hypothesized to improve flexibility by dissipating myofascial adhesions; however, research is lacking. # Objective To determine the effect of the application of a floss band to the thigh on hamstring flexibility and lower extremity power. # Design Crossover Study # Setting Exercise Physiology Laboratory. # Participants Twenty-one recreationally active individuals (8 male, 13 female; age = 22.62±2.99 years; height = 171.52±9.08 cm; mass = 73.57±11.37 kg). # Methods Three counterbalanced interventions were studied during body weight squats, lunges, and hamstring curls (without resistance): floss, sham, and control. The floss treatment included wrapping the Rogue Wide Voodoo Floss Band™ from the proximal knee to the gluteal fold at a pressure of 140 to 200 mmHg. The sham treatment included wrapping the same band in the same location with less pressure (10 to 40 mmHg) while the control treatment did not include floss band application. Hip flexion range of motion, via the straight leg raise, and power (single-leg vertical jump) were compared from pre-test to post-test using a 3x2 repeated measures ANOVA. # Results There was a significant interaction between time and session for hamstring flexibility (F~(2,40)~=17.54, *p*<0.001, η^2^=0.47). Post hoc tests showed significant differences between pre- (86.14±8.06 degrees) and post-test (90.81±7.69 degrees) for the floss session (*p*<0.001, Mean Difference=4.67, CI~95~=3.35-5.98) and between pre- (87.67±7.51 degrees) and post-test (89.86±7.88 degrees) for the sham session (*p*=0.001, Mean Difference=2.19, CI~95~=0.98-3.40). There were no significant interactions for jump power (F~(2,40)~=1.82, *P*=0.18, η^2^=0.08, 1-β=0.36). # Conclusions Flossing treatment increased hamstring flexibility more than the sham session without affecting lower body power. Flossing could be beneficial when treatment or performance preparation goals are increased flexibility without decreased power. Future studies should continue to examine the clinical effectiveness of flossing on an injured population.
format article
author Zachary Maust
Debbie Bradney
Sean M Collins
Caroline Wesley
Thomas G Bowman
author_facet Zachary Maust
Debbie Bradney
Sean M Collins
Caroline Wesley
Thomas G Bowman
author_sort Zachary Maust
title The Effects of Soft Tissue Flossing on Hamstring Range of Motion and Lower Extremity Power
title_short The Effects of Soft Tissue Flossing on Hamstring Range of Motion and Lower Extremity Power
title_full The Effects of Soft Tissue Flossing on Hamstring Range of Motion and Lower Extremity Power
title_fullStr The Effects of Soft Tissue Flossing on Hamstring Range of Motion and Lower Extremity Power
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Soft Tissue Flossing on Hamstring Range of Motion and Lower Extremity Power
title_sort effects of soft tissue flossing on hamstring range of motion and lower extremity power
publisher North American Sports Medicine Institute
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5be92557712d4b0c81404912f7d7c66c
work_keys_str_mv AT zacharymaust theeffectsofsofttissueflossingonhamstringrangeofmotionandlowerextremitypower
AT debbiebradney theeffectsofsofttissueflossingonhamstringrangeofmotionandlowerextremitypower
AT seanmcollins theeffectsofsofttissueflossingonhamstringrangeofmotionandlowerextremitypower
AT carolinewesley theeffectsofsofttissueflossingonhamstringrangeofmotionandlowerextremitypower
AT thomasgbowman theeffectsofsofttissueflossingonhamstringrangeofmotionandlowerextremitypower
AT zacharymaust effectsofsofttissueflossingonhamstringrangeofmotionandlowerextremitypower
AT debbiebradney effectsofsofttissueflossingonhamstringrangeofmotionandlowerextremitypower
AT seanmcollins effectsofsofttissueflossingonhamstringrangeofmotionandlowerextremitypower
AT carolinewesley effectsofsofttissueflossingonhamstringrangeofmotionandlowerextremitypower
AT thomasgbowman effectsofsofttissueflossingonhamstringrangeofmotionandlowerextremitypower
_version_ 1718385274137870336