No difference of survival between cruciate retaining and substitution designs in high flexion total knee arthroplasty

Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the long-term implant survival and outcomes in patients with high-flexion cruciate-retaining (CR) or high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting (PS) knee implants. A total of 253 knees (CR group: 159 vs. PS group: 94) were available for examination ove...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gun-Woo Kim, Quan He Jin, Jun-Hyuk Lim, Eun-Kyoo Song, Jong-Keun Seon
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5bf665eb2b424115985474f5936e6f67
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5bf665eb2b424115985474f5936e6f67
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5bf665eb2b424115985474f5936e6f672021-12-02T11:45:03ZNo difference of survival between cruciate retaining and substitution designs in high flexion total knee arthroplasty10.1038/s41598-021-85892-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/5bf665eb2b424115985474f5936e6f672021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85892-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the long-term implant survival and outcomes in patients with high-flexion cruciate-retaining (CR) or high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting (PS) knee implants. A total of 253 knees (CR group: 159 vs. PS group: 94) were available for examination over a mean follow-up of 10 years. Clinical outcomes were assessed including the Hospital for Special Surgery score, Knee Society score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score at the final follow-up. Radiologic measurements were also assessed including the hip-knee-ankle angle and radiolucent lines according to the KSS system at the final follow-up. The survival rate was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. At the final follow-up, the mean total HSS scores were similar between the two groups (p = 0.970). The mean hip-knee-ankle angle at the final follow-up was similar between groups (p = 0.601). The 10- and 15-year survival rates were 95.4% and 93.3% in the CR group and 92.7% and 90.9% in the PS group, respectively, with no significant difference. Similar clinical and radiographic outcomes could be achieved with both the high-flexion CR and high-flexion PS total knee designs without a difference in survival rate after a 10-year follow-up.Gun-Woo KimQuan He JinJun-Hyuk LimEun-Kyoo SongJong-Keun SeonNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Gun-Woo Kim
Quan He Jin
Jun-Hyuk Lim
Eun-Kyoo Song
Jong-Keun Seon
No difference of survival between cruciate retaining and substitution designs in high flexion total knee arthroplasty
description Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the long-term implant survival and outcomes in patients with high-flexion cruciate-retaining (CR) or high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting (PS) knee implants. A total of 253 knees (CR group: 159 vs. PS group: 94) were available for examination over a mean follow-up of 10 years. Clinical outcomes were assessed including the Hospital for Special Surgery score, Knee Society score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score at the final follow-up. Radiologic measurements were also assessed including the hip-knee-ankle angle and radiolucent lines according to the KSS system at the final follow-up. The survival rate was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. At the final follow-up, the mean total HSS scores were similar between the two groups (p = 0.970). The mean hip-knee-ankle angle at the final follow-up was similar between groups (p = 0.601). The 10- and 15-year survival rates were 95.4% and 93.3% in the CR group and 92.7% and 90.9% in the PS group, respectively, with no significant difference. Similar clinical and radiographic outcomes could be achieved with both the high-flexion CR and high-flexion PS total knee designs without a difference in survival rate after a 10-year follow-up.
format article
author Gun-Woo Kim
Quan He Jin
Jun-Hyuk Lim
Eun-Kyoo Song
Jong-Keun Seon
author_facet Gun-Woo Kim
Quan He Jin
Jun-Hyuk Lim
Eun-Kyoo Song
Jong-Keun Seon
author_sort Gun-Woo Kim
title No difference of survival between cruciate retaining and substitution designs in high flexion total knee arthroplasty
title_short No difference of survival between cruciate retaining and substitution designs in high flexion total knee arthroplasty
title_full No difference of survival between cruciate retaining and substitution designs in high flexion total knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr No difference of survival between cruciate retaining and substitution designs in high flexion total knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed No difference of survival between cruciate retaining and substitution designs in high flexion total knee arthroplasty
title_sort no difference of survival between cruciate retaining and substitution designs in high flexion total knee arthroplasty
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5bf665eb2b424115985474f5936e6f67
work_keys_str_mv AT gunwookim nodifferenceofsurvivalbetweencruciateretainingandsubstitutiondesignsinhighflexiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT quanhejin nodifferenceofsurvivalbetweencruciateretainingandsubstitutiondesignsinhighflexiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT junhyuklim nodifferenceofsurvivalbetweencruciateretainingandsubstitutiondesignsinhighflexiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT eunkyoosong nodifferenceofsurvivalbetweencruciateretainingandsubstitutiondesignsinhighflexiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT jongkeunseon nodifferenceofsurvivalbetweencruciateretainingandsubstitutiondesignsinhighflexiontotalkneearthroplasty
_version_ 1718395282734972928